|
Replies: 22
| visibility 4209
|
Mascot [22]
TigerPulse: 87%
3
|
Are we losing our home game against USC?
Jan 25, 2021, 7:43 PM
|
|
We wanted to play USC. The ACC gave permission for 10 ACC games plus one.
Are we not resetting so we have USC at home for 2021?
I haven’t heard officially.
Is no one else mad about this?
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [87181]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 39365
Joined: 2003
|
Wow, talk about a little used scok! Two whole posts
Jan 25, 2021, 7:48 PM
|
|
since 2008? Who could you be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105933]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
+1 for that astute observation!!!***
Jan 25, 2021, 7:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [86202]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 17971
Joined: 2017
|
I bet he's short, stoopid and annoying.
Jan 26, 2021, 8:45 AM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5713]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: Are we losing our home game against USC?
Jan 25, 2021, 7:55 PM
|
|
No, not mad. Schedules are made 15 to 20 years out these days. If you start switching games around you would have to redo all the already set schedules. If not, you would have 6 home games one year and 8 the next. Easier just to play the games as already scheduled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11432]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13375
Joined: 2014
|
Well, since we were ready to play the coots, but they bailed
Jan 25, 2021, 8:06 PM
|
|
They should be penalized in some way. I think the 2021 game should be at Clemson, but then keep the
regularly scheduled rotation, so we would get the home game in 2021 and 2022!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31249]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 22746
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Well, since we were ready to play the coots, but they bailed
Jan 25, 2021, 8:08 PM
|
|
I'm with you longtall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2992]
TigerPulse: 91%
33
|
Re: Well, since we were ready to play the coots, but they bailed
Jan 26, 2021, 2:14 AM
[ in reply to Well, since we were ready to play the coots, but they bailed ] |
|
Yes, I am with you Long. We lose the home game but we also lose the much needed income after such a sucky 2020. Ppl say no big deal but monetarily that is Millions we have lost for our athletic program. We should make them pay extra if we lose our home game that we were open to play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55413]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44253
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [971]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
“They actually didn’t bail.” Don’t be so gullible, McFly!
Jan 26, 2021, 1:01 PM
|
|
It’s like when you have a Democrat elected in a majority Republican district. When a strongly Democrat bill is is going to pass by a large majority, that representative can vote AGAINST the bill because his vote doesn’t matter- the bill is passing without his vote. He can then tell his district constituents “see, I voted against the bill” and be viewed by the gullible as a moderate or even a closet Republican.
So, when the coots say, “see, we voted for out of conference games” DON’T buy it - they knew the SEC vote against OOC games was already in the bag. If the SEC vote was tied and coots had the deciding vote, does ANYONE actually believe they would have voted to “let’s go play Clemson AT Death Valley and get our azzes kicked 56-7 for the 7th time in a row!” Right. If you buy that, I have the clear title to a bridge over the Cooper River that I can sell to you at a great price. You can make your money back in two years just by charging tolls!
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [81818]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 44566
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5713]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: Well, since we were ready to play the coots, but they bailed
Jan 26, 2021, 7:42 AM
[ in reply to Well, since we were ready to play the coots, but they bailed ] |
|
USuK did not bail on the game. They voted to play the OOC games. It was the SEC conference big wigs that decided only conference games could be played.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16918]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: Well, since we were ready to play the coots, but they bailed
Jan 26, 2021, 10:05 AM
|
|
That's what she said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [519]
TigerPulse: 86%
19
|
Re: Are we losing our home game against USC?
Jan 25, 2021, 8:01 PM
|
|
I didn’t know we ever had the Trojans on our schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [75225]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 13559
Joined: 2019
|
Re: Are we losing our home game against USC?
Jan 25, 2021, 8:30 PM
|
|
Yes, we are losing our home game against the Lamecocks. Too bad we missed out on a sure blowout, but it will make a win in Columbia next year even sweeter.
Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9805]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Are we losing our home game against USC?
Jan 25, 2021, 9:17 PM
|
|
We don't have any home games agains Southern Cal. We lost to them in '66.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4324]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Are we losing our home game against USC?
Jan 25, 2021, 9:36 PM
|
|
Don't much matter where we beat them at, could honestly care less if we even play them. Screw the coots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55413]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44253
Joined: 2004
|
Who calls them USC?***
Jan 26, 2021, 5:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24845]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 14569
Joined: 2013
|
He’ll figure it out when he poasts again...
Jan 26, 2021, 5:12 AM
|
|
In 2034.
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [4040]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
USC is in california...
Jan 26, 2021, 5:44 AM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [971]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: USC is in california... and Carolina is in Chapel Hill!***
Jan 26, 2021, 6:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [51179]
TigerPulse: 79%
58
Posts: 37225
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31114]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 11315
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Are we losing our home game against USC?
Jan 26, 2021, 12:35 PM
|
|
Doesn’t matter we’re going to whoop them for many many years to come
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 4209
|
|
|
50
