|
Replies: 16
| visibility 104
|
TigerNet Elite [69939]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 41651
Joined: 2001
|
May have been discussed, but did anyone get the
Oct 24, 2022, 10:14 AM
|
|
impression that the refereeing crew on Saturday got a call at halftime from the head office that told them to make the calls or get fired? The lack of no holding calls in the first half was unbearable.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [33710]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 36093
Joined: 2003
|
hitting a WR in the face is the very definition of pass
Oct 24, 2022, 10:16 AM
|
|
interference .. or at least i thought it was before this game
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69939]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 41651
Joined: 2001
|
That no-call was inexcusable!***
Oct 24, 2022, 10:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17002]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21903
Joined: 2007
|
Re: That no-call was inexcusable!***
Oct 24, 2022, 10:22 AM
|
|
This!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17002]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21903
Joined: 2007
|
Re: hitting a WR in the face is the very definition of pass
Oct 24, 2022, 10:22 AM
[ in reply to hitting a WR in the face is the very definition of pass ] |
|
The defender never even looked for the ball, and I though that was a requirement in order to avoid an interference call. We got hosed on many calls last week, especially in the 1st half.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [33710]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 36093
Joined: 2003
|
"defenders" plural***
Oct 24, 2022, 10:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55400]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44245
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [45979]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 11425
Joined: 2017
|
Re: But the only reason Clemson won was becasue of the refs.
Oct 24, 2022, 11:35 AM
|
|
They were literally complaining about the “southern” refs at the game. Of course we never heard a peep about all the holds, PIs and apparently we can add hand stomping to the list they were getting away with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69791]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90831
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101579]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29894
Joined: 2005
|
We were definitely the beneficiary of a few iffy calls
Oct 24, 2022, 10:25 AM
|
|
in the second half
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69939]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 41651
Joined: 2001
|
Re: We were definitely the beneficiary of a few iffy calls
Oct 24, 2022, 10:38 AM
|
|
If you are talking about one of them being the difference between the out-of-bounds forcible contact fouls, I still believe Schrader was still in bounds when he was pushed out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3159]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
No iffyness about it…Cuse earned those penalties….
Oct 24, 2022, 11:27 AM
[ in reply to We were definitely the beneficiary of a few iffy calls ] |
|
I do have a slight bit of sympathy that it was like a basketball game where the whistles got tighter in the 2nd half.
Refs let them get away with much in first half.
But their holds were legit…and plenty of those continued uncalled.
The personal fouls were legit too…clearly they wanted to intimidate Cade….didn’t work.
No iffiness to it.
The media can kiss Dabo’s rings and find something else to whine about on our bye week
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69791]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90831
Joined: 2001
|
What is even more amusing...
Oct 24, 2022, 10:26 AM
|
|
is all the Cuse fans clamoring about how the refs pretty much handed the game to Clemson.
Whatever helps you sleep at night princess.
The next time the refs do anything that benefits Clemson will be the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34043]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 14319
Joined: 2014
|
Re: May have been discussed, but did anyone get the
Oct 24, 2022, 10:33 AM
|
|
Seemed like a halftime adjustment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8712]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Shrader sack that resulted in a personal foul for Murphy
Oct 24, 2022, 10:45 AM
|
|
Murphy was being held by 2 players while trying to get to the QB.
Am I wrong about that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3332]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
No ma'am!
Oct 24, 2022, 11:29 AM
|
|
You are correct!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3439]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 104
|
|
|
50
