Replies: 5
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [3311]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Here is my reason why Deshaun DESERVES the Heisman this year
Dec 6, 2016, 9:48 AM
|
|
Clemson FBS WINS: Auburn: 8-4 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 20 Troy: 9-3 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 32 GT: 8-4 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 63 Louisville: 9-3 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 11 Boston College: 6-6 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 8 NCst.: 6-6 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 28 Syracuse: 4-8 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 122 Wake: 6-6 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 39 USuCk: 6-6 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 62 VT: 9-4 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 19 FLst.: 9-3 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 29
In Total, Clemson has 11 wins over teams that have a 60.15% win rate (80-53) and have a Total Defense at an average of 39th in the nation.
Louiville FBS WINS: Syracuse: 4-8 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 122 FLst.: 9-3 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 29 Marshall: 3-9 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 105 Duke: 4-8 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 67 NCst.: 6-6 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 28 Virginia: 2-10 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 94 Boston College: 6-6 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 8 Wake: 6-6 with TOTAL DEFENSE ranking: 39
In Total, Louisville has 8 wins over FBS teams that have a 41.67% win rate (40-56) and have a Total Defense at an average of 62nd in the nation.
I mean...if this isn't the DEFINITION of padding stats against inferior opponents, then I don't understand what is football. Deshaun was held to IMPOSSIBLE standards because of last season, and he is exceeding everyone in college football except Mr. cartoon stats vs crap defenses.
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1130]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: Here is my reason why Deshaun DESERVES the Heisman this year
Dec 6, 2016, 9:51 AM
|
|
Plus who stayed in games longer? I know dw4 hasn't played nearly as many minutes as he could have.
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1130]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: Here is my reason why Deshaun DESERVES the Heisman this year
Dec 6, 2016, 9:53 AM
|
|
And dw4 would throw for 600+ yards and 8 TD vs Unc charlotte. Good grief.
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1130]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3311]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Didn't even count UNC Charlotte or SC State***
Dec 6, 2016, 9:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1816]
TigerPulse: 96%
31
|
That's funny, I did the same thing but with
Dec 6, 2016, 10:18 AM
|
|
defensive efficiency instead of total defense, which I think is a more relevant stat:
Defensive Efficiency (DE) is the value generated by a team's defense per non-garbage possession relative to national average scoring rates by starting field position.
Louisville (9-3, 7-1 ACC) Date Opponent Result DE Rnk 9/1/2016 vs Charlotte (4-8, 3-5 C-USA) W 70-14 106 9/9/2016 @ Syracuse (4-8, 2-6 ACC) W 62-28 99 9/17/2016 vs 10 Florida State (9-3, 5-3 ACC) W 63-20 17 9/24/2016 @ Marshall (3-9, 2-6 C-USA) W 59-28 123 10/1/2016 @ 3 Clemson (12-1, 8-1 ACC) L 36-42 9 10/14/2016 vs Duke (4-8, 1-7 ACC) W 24-14 58 10/22/2016 vs NCSU e (6-6, 3-5 ACC) W 54-13 22 10/29/2016 @ Virginia (2-10, 1-7 ACC) W 32-25 69 11/5/2016 @ Boston College (6-6, 2-6 ACC) W 52-7 24 11/12/2016 vs Wake Forest (6-6, 3-5 ACC) W 44-12 21 11/17/2016 @ Houston (9-3, 5-3 AAC) L 10-36 25 11/26/2016 vs Kentucky (7-5, 4-4 SEC) L 38-41 84 55 Clemson (12-1, 8-1 ACC) Date Opponent Result DE Rnk 9/3/2016 @ 17 Auburn (8-4, 5-3 SEC) W 19-13 10 9/10/2016 vs Troy (9-3, 6-2 Sun Belt) W 30-24 25 9/17/2016 vs South Carolina State (FCS) W 59-0 N/A 9/22/2016 @ Georgia Tech (8-4, 4-4 ACC) W 26-7 87 10/1/2016 vs 15 Louisville (9-3, 7-1 ACC) W 42-36 13 10/7/2016 @ Boston College (6-6, 2-6 ACC) W 56-10 24 10/15/2016 vs NCSU (6-6, 3-5 ACC) W 24-17 22 10/29/2016 @ 10 Florida State (9-3, 5-3 ACC) W 37-34 17 11/5/2016 vs Syracuse (4-8, 2-6 ACC) W 54-0 99 11/12/2016 vs 22 Pittsburgh (8-4, 5-3 ACC) L 42-43 72 11/19/2016 @ Wake Forest (6-6, 3-5 ACC) W 35-13 21 11/26/2016 vs South Carolina (6-6, 3-5 SEC) W 56-7 48 12/3/2016 vs* 18 Virginia Tech (9-4, 6-3 ACC) W 42-35 14 38
Clemson went 8/8 against top 25 ranked teams in Defensive Efficiency with a puzzling loss coming to #72 Pitt.
Louisville went 4/6 against top 25 ranked teams in Defensive Efficiency with a puzzling loss to #84 Kentucky.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 5
| visibility 1
|
|
|