|
TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
storage
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 255
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46614
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 27, 2019, 3:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [62797]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62816
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 27, 2019, 4:05 PM
|
|
Somebody please post this article over on FGF!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6660]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
Vegas does know Tua is out right?
Nov 27, 2019, 4:06 PM
|
|
They should be at least a 2 TD dog to Clemson and LSU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14588]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23655
Joined: 2004
|
Generally speaking, no one player is worth 14 points
Nov 27, 2019, 8:19 PM
|
|
more than his replacement, not even a Heisman caliber QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2367]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Generally speaking, no one player is worth 14 points
Nov 28, 2019, 7:21 AM
|
|
Alabama needed a garbage touchdown to cut it to 5 at home against LSU. If you figure 3 points for a neutral field and say half of the garbage TD, that would put it at 11.5 with Tua. The spread would never move that much because of Bama's name and all of the hype, but Bama would be a big underdog against LSU or us before the game started. With us there would be a huge amount of sharp money put on us early at -4.5 because they would know that figure could only go up. We would be -8 before the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2367]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Generally speaking, no one player is worth 14 points
Nov 28, 2019, 7:21 AM
[ in reply to Generally speaking, no one player is worth 14 points ] |
|
Alabama needed a garbage touchdown to cut it to 5 at home against LSU. If you figure 3 points for a neutral field and say half of the garbage TD, that would put it at 11.5 with Tua. The spread would never move that much because of Bama's name and all of the hype, but Bama would be a big underdog against LSU or us before the game started. With us there would be a huge amount of sharp money put on us early at -4.5 because they would know that figure could only go up. We would be -8 before the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2219]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 27, 2019, 4:16 PM
|
|
Clearly Vegas didn't clear this with the talking heads at ESPN first. Then they would know that all of those teams should be favored over Clemson. It's obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [40330]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 22707
Joined: 2003
|
I Would Literally Bet $10K on Clemson -4.5 to Bama ***
Nov 27, 2019, 4:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31888]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16413
Joined: 2015
|
So despite being #3 in the polls..
Nov 27, 2019, 4:17 PM
|
|
We're favored against the other/potential playoff teams...
Ok got it....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [39364]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 33514
Joined: 2011
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 27, 2019, 6:20 PM
|
|
I know it's crazy to say , and maybe a little irresponsible ... but Clemson is 2 scores better than the field provided we play mistake free football and our cylinders are firing cleanly in all facets .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22177]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17428
Joined: 1998
|
Vegas oddsmakers are knowledgeably is sports analysis. Also_
Nov 27, 2019, 6:26 PM
|
|
consider the lines not only account for which team will win and how much _ but who the betting public will favor. Ohio State and Bama are typically favorites in tge gambling community. This means those lines may be understated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14483]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Re: Vegas oddsmakers are knowledgeably is sports analysis. Also_
Nov 27, 2019, 10:23 PM
|
|
Exactly these lines are about making money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22127]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 27, 2019, 8:25 PM
|
|
The playoff committee should be checking these numbers. The betting houses are not in the business to lose. Maybe the committee make-up in the future should include the Las Vegas odds makers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62797]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62816
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 27, 2019, 11:00 PM
|
|
They should stop allowing ESECPN from leading the poles to do what benefits ESPN's back account, IMPO!!! They did the exact same with the BCS bowl bids for the NCG, and they are doing the exact same thing with the AP and Coaches polls that drains down in the lap of the Playoff committee bc the SEC has been on a downward spiral for the past several years.
When the SEC don't have at least 4 teams in the top 10, ESECPN loses their $$$$ that they personally pay into the SEC that was suppose help keep the SEC conference at the top of college FB. When the SEC is down, the propaganda machine that consist of ESECPN employee's that will start up their false claims of how great the SEC is as a whole over every other conference in college FB!!! It must work out like for ESECPN or their sports Giant loses tons of $$$$$$$$$$$ when their #1 backed conference starts getting beat by the Clemson's and other conference teams not a member of the SEC!!!
ESECPN was sure that when the made the choice to throw big cash at the SEC bc of big time college FB schools/teams like Bama, Florida, 10 A C, Aubarn, LSU, and a few other big time FB schools that were in the same SEC conference, that their $$$$$ was safe, and with their continued financial backing, that those schools would stay at the top of college FB, but their plan is falling apart, and they're doing whatever it takes to keep those schools talked about at the top, true or false, until they can turn them back in the right direction, but they keep falling in spite of the ESECPN big time cash!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29953]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
So, if the committee wants the 4 best teams...
Nov 27, 2019, 8:32 PM
|
|
...it is easy.
1. Clemson
2. Ohio State
3. LSU
4. Bama
(LSU would get the three seed due to head to head.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
Guido doesn't lie.***
Nov 27, 2019, 8:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1286]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 27, 2019, 8:53 PM
|
|
Clemson -8 Georgia ... ha
We would debone GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14483]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 27, 2019, 10:21 PM
|
|
Yawn....when will the media learn. Probably never. Vegas knows the deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 88%
1
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 28, 2019, 10:05 PM
|
|
well, how much faith do you have in Vegas given them picking against Clemson in 6 of the 7 playoff games that we've been in?
And us being 5-2 straight up in those games and beating the spread in one that we lost (albeit on a late TD)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [6]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 28, 2019, 7:27 AM
|
|
CLEMSON 63 SOUTH CAROLINA 12 OH PLEASE CONTINUE TO LOAD UP AND PUT THE SCARE IN ALL OF THEM. THANKS TO MACK BROWN. HE HAS BEEN CALLING IT. EVERY GAME NOW IS CHAMPIONSHIP HELPING TO REACH THE SUMMIT IN JANUARY. LOVE YOU GUYS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3434]
TigerPulse: 91%
34
|
Re: TNET: Vegas odds on Clemson-OSU, Clemson-LSU, Clemson-UGA, Clemson-Alabama
Nov 28, 2019, 3:05 PM
|
|
Not sure if I missed it, but is there a source aside from just being called “Vegas”?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102418]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98934
Joined: 2009
|
I'll take Clemson in all of those games.
Nov 28, 2019, 3:08 PM
|
|
It is unpossible that our defense gives up half as many points as our offense scores on either of those teams. It's just senseless, mindless poppycock to think otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 255
|
|
|
|
50
