|
Replies: 21
| visibility 53
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 11344
Joined: 1995
|
Front Page Story: Clemson vs Georgia Tech Prediction
Oct 28, 2011, 11:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1910]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
2nd half offense has been lights out this year. Their pass
Oct 28, 2011, 11:28 AM
|
|
defense it about to exposed and DJ has a career day. Bellamy gets in the highlight reel as well (if he hangs on to the ball) 49-28 CU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16196]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
I think the 50 pt streak stays alive.
Oct 28, 2011, 11:39 AM
|
|
52-31 los tigres
KO td return, and at least one defensive score. Get em tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [872]
TigerPulse: 94%
23
|
This game has had me fidgety all week!
Oct 28, 2011, 11:42 AM
|
|
PUT EM' AWAY EARLY!! GO TIGERS!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [499]
TigerPulse: 92%
18
|
Re: Front Page Story: Clemson vs Georgia Tech Prediction
Oct 28, 2011, 11:44 AM
|
|
45-10 Good Guys
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18213]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22450
Joined: 1999
|
Why was the computer's prediction better than Swann's?
Oct 28, 2011, 11:44 AM
|
|
Swann had the margin of victory exact and had the higher scores to boot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18213]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22450
Joined: 1999
|
Re: Why was the computer's prediction better than Swann's?
Oct 28, 2011, 11:46 AM
|
|
Last week, I mean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6694]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
David's was one point better than the computer as well.***
Oct 28, 2011, 12:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43178]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43584
Joined: 1998
|
stupid computer doesn't know Ellington is out***
Oct 28, 2011, 11:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3507]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
And still hasn't figure out how we Sammy them***
Oct 28, 2011, 12:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [25]
TigerPulse: 100%
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1826]
TigerPulse: 67%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3350]
TigerPulse: 97%
34
|
One side effect of having to play assignment defense . . .
Oct 28, 2011, 1:33 PM
|
|
if a player misses a tackle, there will probably not be help close by and the likelyhood of it becoming a big gain is good. I expect this to happen if our defense doesn't get in good position and make fundemental tackles. I see the Wreck getting 14 points off of plays that should have been tackled in the backfield but end up going the distance. If we execute on offense, it won't matter. Tigers 55 GT 24.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1039]
TigerPulse: 36%
25
|
You're absolutely right
Oct 28, 2011, 1:42 PM
|
|
The option forces everybody to do their job and each player has to make the tackle one-on-one. That's one huge reason why Clemson has struggled against them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [132]
TigerPulse: 44%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4788]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Nice blog, enjoyed it.***
Oct 28, 2011, 9:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24244]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24554
Joined: 2003
|
Actual is a genius.***
Oct 28, 2011, 2:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3429]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
David Hood won last week. Not the 3rd place computer***
Oct 28, 2011, 3:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [85]
TigerPulse: 96%
9
|
Re: Front Page Story: Clemson vs Georgia Tech Prediction
Oct 28, 2011, 6:40 PM
|
|
GO TIGERS!!! Crush these nerds!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3233]
TigerPulse: 98%
34
|
28-10. Good guys.***
Oct 28, 2011, 6:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 11569
Joined: 1995
|
prediction tracker corrected***
Oct 28, 2011, 6:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2837]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
The Cat Who Kicked the Hornets' Nest***
Oct 28, 2011, 7:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 53
|
|
|
50
