|
Replies: 15
| visibility 8
|
Orange Blooded [2081]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
|
|
|
 |
Dynasty Maker [3515]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 12:20 AM
|
|
They really are mo Ron’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7011]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 12:27 AM
|
|
I ain't no mo Ron
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3515]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 12:20 AM
|
|
They really are mo Ron’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7011]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 12:27 AM
|
|
Really, I ain't no mo Ron.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1074]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 12:33 AM
|
|
Get a brain morans....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4880]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 6:26 AM
|
|
Be careful what you hope for Coots. They quit the ACC because they couldn't compete academically. These idiots in Cooterville want it both ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 7:40 AM
|
|
It's sad that some of them know they will be dead before USUC beats CLEMSON again. I really wanted them to hang around and take the medicine that they deserve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [465]
TigerPulse: 81%
18
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 7:49 AM
|
|
All speculative and in the Coastal that could be true. However, Muschamp's record shows they typically beat teams that are below and 500 and lose to teams above 500. And I think they have beaten one ranked opponent. I could be wrong, but I think TN was ranked last year or the year before when they beat them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [40323]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 22701
Joined: 2003
|
Coots Consensus #1 For Delusional Fanbase***
Nov 13, 2018, 7:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69783]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90820
Joined: 2001
|
As if they need anyone's help to make them look stupid...
Nov 13, 2018, 7:58 AM
|
|
That is one of the few areas at which they excel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3824]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: As if they need anyone's help to make them look stupid...
Nov 13, 2018, 8:17 AM
|
|
It sure isn't math!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4995]
TigerPulse: 59%
37
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 8:24 AM
|
|
Depends on their schedule.
Some of those ACC coastal teams play nothing but cupcakes OOC. They could be ranked playing one of their slates for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6825]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC
Nov 13, 2018, 9:09 AM
|
|
Hypothetical coastal run (not including a loss to Clemson... assume a OOC there) for the coots would put them at 4-4.
They will struggle with disciplined/rushing oriented teams. Thus a loss to "good" GT & Pitt.
Division crossover: Loss to 'Cuse/BC/Atlantic with a pulse.
Toss-up win to VaTech, Miami. Beats Duke & UNCheat.
Random bad loss to a decent Virginia.
4-4. Assume cupcakes in the OOC (+1 ACC or -1 for ND) and an obliteration against Clemson... and they sit at 6-6.... humm, that record looks like their current record. I don't even think the polls can justify a 6-6 Auburn team being ranked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69783]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90820
Joined: 2001
|
Toss-up v. Duke...not so sure about that !!!
Nov 13, 2018, 9:30 AM
|
|
With wins over Pitt and Northwestern (both of which are better than any wins u5c has this year), Duke is likely favored in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24064]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 20307
Joined: 2011
|
If USuC playecour schedule
Nov 13, 2018, 9:34 AM
[ in reply to Re: Coots would be ranked if they were in the ACC ] |
|
,as in our conference schedule, they'd have to adhere to ACC Standards of admission. That worked out so well for them the first time.
likewise , slap Clemson with USuC's schedule and the SEC's admission standards LOLOLOLOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 8
|
|
|
50
