|
Replies: 27
| visibility 4766
|
Clemson Icon [24210]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24532
Joined: 2003
|
Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
4
Nov 24, 2024, 9:45 AM
|
|
Clemson won by 37
SC won by 44
Clemson racked up 562 yards
SC had 608
Clemson gave up 387 yards on defense
SC gave up 252
Clemson was + 1 in turnovers
SC was -2
Clemson gave up 9 yards per pass
SC gave up 7.1
Clemson allowed 5.2 per rush
SC allowed 1.3
Clemson was 2-2 on 4th down
SC was 0-0
Clemson won the 1st down margin 27-15
SC won it 34-14
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [401]
TigerPulse: 100%
17
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
13
13
Nov 24, 2024, 9:51 AM
|
|
Citadel 30
Wofford 17
11/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24210]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24532
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
Nov 24, 2024, 11:44 AM
|
|
Both Citadel and Wofford are 5-7 and in the same conference.
Here are the stats of their game.
Citadel had 357 yards (-30 than vs Clemson)
Wofford had 267 (+15 than they had vs SC)
Citadel was -3 in turnovers in that game
Citadel had 9.2 yards per pass (+0.2 than vs Clemson)
Wofford had 7.6 (+0.5 than vs SC)
Citadel got 3.9 yards per carry (1.3 yards per carry less than vs Clemson)
Wofford got 4.7 (3.4 yards per carry more than vs SC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11979]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
3
Nov 24, 2024, 10:11 AM
|
|
I thought you were going to compare our score yesterday to the last time the coots played the Citadel in 2015 when the Cid won 23-22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4795]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
1
Nov 24, 2024, 10:12 AM
|
|
Now do score by quarter bc SCAR was sleep walking in the first half. They had to use depth and wear Wofford out to blow the game open.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [66]
TigerPulse: 97%
7
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
4
Nov 24, 2024, 10:23 AM
|
|
Did you really just put down Carolina at averaging 9 yds a throw...without mentioning they only completed ONE pass?! Gosh, this comparison just might be a little more subjective than it appears....9 yds per pass? Really? They were 1 for 9...with an interception....skew your stats much?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24210]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24532
Joined: 2003
|
It's odd to get mad at listing stats. I just copy and pasted them. No skew.
Nov 24, 2024, 11:31 AM
|
|
I didn't say any opinions or conclusions about them. You should ask yourself why it makes you upset.
They were 3/11 passing. So if they bust a big one... math is math. I didn't invent math.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [66]
TigerPulse: 97%
7
|
Re: It's odd to get mad at listing stats. I just copy and pasted them. No skew.
1
Nov 24, 2024, 1:14 PM
|
|
There's nothing about sports that makes me upset. I just didn't let you get away with making an intentionally false inference...by saying that the Citadel "averaged" 9 yds per pass while leaving out the much more significant stat..that they only completed ONE PASS..the whole game...for 9 yds. You couldve also said.." Citadel averaged 1 yd per pass play on 1 for 9 passing"...that's a much more revealing stat. Your description is simply deceptive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24210]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24532
Joined: 2003
|
It's not a false inference. It's called math. That's a stat. I didn't make it up
1
Nov 24, 2024, 9:27 PM
|
|
I didn't give a "description." I copy and pasted a statistic. Maybe you want to add a bunch of context to it.
They had 11 attempts. They completed 3. They got 99 yards passing total. That averages to 9 yards per attempt. If you want to get into an argument with the existence of math I'm not sure where to direct your call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9870]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11156
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6293]
TigerPulse: 95%
40
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
3
Nov 24, 2024, 10:24 AM
|
|
Since the Citadel beat Wofford 30-17 maybe those numbers would
be reversed.All is apples and oranges and it makes no difference
in the game with the coots. The chickens are a fraud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1900]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
3
Nov 24, 2024, 10:39 AM
|
|
Also, I didn't watch the coot game, but I assume we subbed more 2s and 3s than they did for longer than they did. Regardless, hate to say it, but gonna be a tough game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [662]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
1
Nov 24, 2024, 11:37 AM
|
|
I didn’t watch the coot game, but looking at the stats, it looks like they played their starters almost all game. You can’t compare the two games after halftime really, I’d look at first half stats only before the 2nds and 3rds came in. We dominated during that time on offense, but gave up a ton of yards on defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12587]
TigerPulse: 98%
47
Posts: 12664
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
1
Nov 24, 2024, 11:37 AM
|
|
So you believe in the transitive properties for CFB? Interesting as that was proven to be bad theory ages ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24210]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24532
Joined: 2003
|
Assuming you meant to respond to me, where did you see anything about that?***
Nov 24, 2024, 11:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4408]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
Nov 24, 2024, 11:47 AM
|
|
Stats against these teams are meaningless. The competition is inferior. I can’t believe you took the time to put all that together
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24210]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24532
Joined: 2003
|
It's copy and pasting mostly. Why take the time to respond?
Nov 24, 2024, 11:49 AM
|
|
Some people are interested. I don't care at all which ones are and which ones are not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1285]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
1
Nov 24, 2024, 1:17 PM
|
|
Reading stats is fun. Seeing who and how it triggers is even more fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26237]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
Nov 24, 2024, 4:14 PM
|
|
🤣
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8225]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
1
Nov 24, 2024, 1:47 PM
|
|
lol, beating FCS teams means nothing. Clemson didn’t even have a game plan for the citadel. It’s like playing the neighbors kid in horse. You don’t wanna make him feel bad so you at least let him get an “H” on you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8225]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
3
Nov 24, 2024, 1:55 PM
|
|
If you like stats, it’s interesting that Clemson is superior statistically to South Carolina in every way, except for “total defense”. South Carolina is not in the top 10 in any defensive category. They’ve only played one top 10 offense and got slaughtered. We will be the second best offense they’ve seen all year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26237]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
Nov 24, 2024, 4:15 PM
|
|
Hardly ever mentioned 😒
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1499]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1637]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
1
Nov 24, 2024, 1:59 PM
|
|
So Clemson wins Saturday by 6.. I’ll take it
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1519]
TigerPulse: 92%
30
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
2
Nov 24, 2024, 2:05 PM
|
|
Clemson up 35-0 at the half and could have won by 70. Why humiliate The Citadel?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31840]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16403
Joined: 2015
|
This must be the football version of "stark raving brad"...***
Nov 24, 2024, 4:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2669]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
SCar scored with 9 seconds remaining in the game.
Nov 24, 2024, 6:01 PM
|
|
Guess they were trying to impress the committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [229]
TigerPulse: 53%
13
|
Re: Comparing Clemson v Citadel & SC v Wofford
Nov 24, 2024, 10:34 PM
|
|
Don't forget Citadel beat Worried 30- 17 Nov 16, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 27
| visibility 4766
|
|
|
50
