Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Are the clock operators employed by the ...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 3
| visibility 1422

Are the clock operators employed by the ...


Feb 19, 2015, 9:36 PM

Conference or the school? Duke has a problem. Just curious

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

A Recurring problem..


Feb 19, 2015, 9:46 PM

Sumpin about that campus affects mind/hand coordination...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: A Recurring problem..


Feb 19, 2015, 11:15 PM

The clock operators are not any more of an issue than the ACC officials.

Go back to last year's ACC Tournament game against Duke. There were two almost identical plays at both ends of the court, with the game on the line -- yes, that's right, Duke got both calls and snuck out of there with a win. Foul on KJ McDaniel (the ACC Defensive Player of the Year; but no foul on Duke when Rod Hall drove the lane. Points to Duke -- ball game. CU screwed once again in the ACCT.

If Clemson would've won, CU would have gone to the Big Dance; and Duke would be a much-lower seed in the NCAAs. I think the ACC refs get bonuses if UNC and Duke get high seeds in the NCAAT. (There's got to be a reason why it continues to happen -- that UNC and Duke get all of the close calls.)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: A Recurring problem..


Feb 20, 2015, 1:33 AM

Yawn.........Clemson never could lose a game because the other team was just better.

Little green men with tin foil hats in the dessert in Roswell work with the Illuminati and the Secret Order of Loyal Water Buffaloes to decide who wins.

Even when Clemson's own writer disapproves the ridiculous myth that John Swofford had nothing to do with adding a year to a Clemson cheating program in 1982, you guys still recite the lie like a 6 years old recites a nursery ryhme.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 3
| visibility 1422
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...71 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic