|
Replies: 17
| visibility 350
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46711
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position
1
Jan 4, 2023, 3:20 PM
|
|
| |  ">
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1342]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position***
Jan 4, 2023, 4:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1342]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position***
1
Jan 4, 2023, 4:09 PM
|
|
No surprises here but interesting to see in statistical form. Our OL needs help! That changes everything! That helps the QB, the WRs, the RBs, the TEs. What is being done here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6660]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
And yet Grisham is still employed....***
1
7
7
7
7
Jan 4, 2023, 4:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [30360]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 12995
Joined: 1998
|
yet any offensive coach is employed.
Jan 4, 2023, 5:58 PM
|
|
Major whiff on the OL since.... ever?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10134]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: yet any offensive coach is employed.
Jan 4, 2023, 7:13 PM
|
|
Since Tommy Bowden years for sure. One season they went in ranked in the top offensive line groups but we ended up with a below 500 W/L
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [347]
TigerPulse: 96%
15
|
“Big Gap between Clemson and the Playoff teams.”
Jan 4, 2023, 5:19 PM
|
|
Understatement of the day! Let’s turn it around, Dabo! Hire us some talented, EXPERIENCED coordinators and position coaches and let’s develop our young, talented roster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1664]
TigerPulse: 92%
31
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position
1
Jan 4, 2023, 5:48 PM
|
|
Turner will be a redshirt freshmen...good news there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1101]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position
Jan 4, 2023, 9:05 PM
|
|
You're right, not even his sophomore season. Should have called it "second season" but sophomore sounded better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7840]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position
1
Jan 4, 2023, 6:59 PM
|
|
Should Grisham have more time to work with the guys that he recruited?
Antonio, Randall, Cole, Noble, Hanafin, Tyler Brown, and Misun are his guys.
The WR room is made up of mostly his guys now. And they are still very young.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2656]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Question: So what is this thing called
Jan 4, 2023, 8:20 PM
|
|
Portal mentioned in this story?
We don’t do portals.
We got who we got.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2368]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position
1
Jan 6, 2023, 8:03 AM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position ] |
|
Grisham is the one coach that I would like to see go. WR production of the players that he took over went down as well. He just isn't getting it done. Unlike some of the other coaches, he has been around long enough to say that he was given a fair shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [63240]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 18375
Joined: 2020
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position
Jan 6, 2023, 11:45 AM
|
|
When theoretically it should be our strongest group. Afterall, Dabo was hired as WR coach. Maybe too much intervention? Someone had posted during the season that during several games it seemed Grisham got zero respect from the players on the sidelines... or something to that effect.
Hard to believe we've had that many whiffs. Even though our recruiting (star rating) has gone down. We didn't even offer Vizz 's WR teammate that is going to Ohio St and is a 5*. What's up with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6166]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Isn’t Cole Turner a RS Freshman next year due to …
Jan 4, 2023, 8:25 PM
|
|
… only playing in four games this year?
Wasn't that the strategy behind holding him out all season even though he was getting rave practice reviews?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1288]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position
1
Jan 4, 2023, 10:12 PM
|
|
There may be many explanations as to why "WRU" is no longer WRU. Are we recruiting well at that position? Clearly we missed some great ones, but I think we have the talent. Was this a reflection of the QB issue? Very likely, but the issues are still there. And how does Jeff Scott fit into this question? That is perhaps the most intriguing question Clemson faces in this off season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [63240]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 18375
Joined: 2020
|
Re: TNET: Final Grades: Breaking down Clemson football's 2022 season by position
Jan 6, 2023, 11:49 AM
|
|
Yes, our recruiting has taken a hit star rating wise. We were high 4 and 5* recruiting. Now low 4's to 3*.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6594]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Math does not lie
3
Jan 5, 2023, 6:31 AM
|
|
Passing grade should be essentially equal to that of the run.
Is it possible to have the same chart done for the 2016 and 2018 seasons Natty teams? I would love to see a comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-95]
TigerPulse: 37%
-1
|
So in reality....
3
Jan 5, 2023, 12:02 PM
|
|
Grades:
QB: Atrocious
WR: Atrocious - except for 2 freshmen.
TE's: MASSIVE improvement from years past.
RB: Our saving grace.
OLINE: Getting better - still not effective.
Defensive front 7: Still elite.
SECONDARY: Young; we should have hit the portal for additional help.
Special teams: Coin toss.
Coaches:
Grisham: Atrocious
Spiller: On the fence
Austin: Improvement seen. Keep him.
Streeter: No confidence in play calling.
Dabo: Still love the man.
Goodwin: Kinda socially awkward, but for his first year filling BV's shoes, I'll give him credit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 350
|
|
|
50
