Replies: 73
| visibility 1279
|
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
So, did Tennessee win their bowl game?
Jan 2, 2014, 3:37 PM
|
|
Oh wait...
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
They got bent by Penn State.***
Jan 2, 2014, 3:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Ah well, they got an SEC win this year
Jan 2, 2014, 3:41 PM
|
|
Who was that against, again?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
There is an excuse I'm sure
Jan 2, 2014, 3:43 PM
|
|
Like it was the biggest win in their program's history and the coots didn't want to be there our something.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6821]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
No, wait, that wasn't the same Tennessee team that played...
Jan 2, 2014, 4:21 PM
|
|
...everyone else! They gave the cockas their best game!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2184]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
GASP!
Jan 2, 2014, 3:48 PM
|
|
You dare speak of the loss to Tenn...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
|
|
|
 |
Rookie [19]
TigerPulse: 18%
2
|
Re: So, did Tennessee win their bowl game?
Jan 2, 2014, 3:50 PM
|
|
Another stupid post spewing class as always!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Let's hope we can play as well as TN tomorrow
Jan 2, 2014, 3:54 PM
|
|
As good as they were this year...
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [26353]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13702
Joined: 2013
|
Yes, they cleaned up
Jan 2, 2014, 3:54 PM
|
|
the ice cream bowl, popcorn bowl, then afterwards the toilet bowl.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Wow
Jan 2, 2014, 4:00 PM
|
|
That UT loss sure made you guys feel good didn't it?
One below average game on the road from your rival and that somehow overshadows 11 wins. Good stuff, guys.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [37033]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 16331
Joined: 2008
|
Are you related to
Jan 2, 2014, 4:01 PM
|
|
Classof09?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4506]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
LOL!! Good catch.***
Jan 2, 2014, 4:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [26353]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13702
Joined: 2013
|
C'mon man,
Jan 2, 2014, 4:03 PM
[ in reply to Wow ] |
|
if we had dropped one on the road to an inferior opponent, say NC State, you and some of your feathered friends would be saying similar stuff.
Don't be a hypocrite brodawg
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
No, the fact that TN kept you from winning the East
Jan 2, 2014, 4:05 PM
[ in reply to Wow ] |
|
made me feel good. The division was terrible the last few years and you blew your shot at doing something, for the first time in your program's history.
I suspect the rivalry means a lot more to you than I. We've got bigger hens to fry, like ACC/division championships and BCS bowl games.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Oh, but good job squeaking out a win over an inferior team
Jan 2, 2014, 4:06 PM
|
|
in an inferior bowl. Good consolation game.
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: Oh, but good job squeaking out a win over an inferior team
Jan 2, 2014, 4:08 PM
|
|
Tenn. did something the Tiger haven't been able to do in five years!
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [26353]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13702
Joined: 2013
|
What, have a losing record? Yea I guess you're right***
Jan 2, 2014, 4:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: What, have a losing record? Yea I guess you're right***
Jan 2, 2014, 4:12 PM
|
|
I guess the "IN FIVE YEARS" part went right over your head!
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [26353]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13702
Joined: 2013
|
Guess how you missed me taking it in a different direction?***
Jan 2, 2014, 4:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1321]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1848]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [22966]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 25003
Joined: 1999
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: nm
Jan 2, 2014, 4:22 PM
|
|
I played football at PC. I use to pull for both teams until I joined this board and was called a coot on every post. So I decided to be a coot. I have been pulling for South Carolina for about two years now, so my past goes back two years.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [22966]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 25003
Joined: 1999
|
yeah, right
Jan 2, 2014, 4:26 PM
|
|
You've been on Tigernet longer than that under different handles.
Just stop the charade and use "poultry lice" for your posting name if you're so freakin' proud of the chickens
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
One word Motor City Cockstripe
Jan 2, 2014, 10:37 PM
[ in reply to Re: nm ] |
|
I S S U E S.
You got 'em.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3258]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Real good! Just like, through the years,following:
Jan 2, 2014, 4:22 PM
[ in reply to Wow ] |
|
Pacific, The Citadel, Furman, The Rainbow Warriors of Hawaii, Ap State, Navy, all of your few bowl opponents before Brad's win in the CARQUEST. Need I go on?
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1848]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
every team during 0-21***
Jan 2, 2014, 4:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: every team during 0-21***
Jan 2, 2014, 5:00 PM
|
|
I have been pulling for them for the last 2 years. I could care less about what happened to them in their past. Before that I was a Bama fan, still am.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1848]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
how convenient***
Jan 2, 2014, 5:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: every team during 0-21***
Jan 2, 2014, 5:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: every team during 0-21*** ] |
|
I played football in the 70's for Cally Gault at PC.I came over to the Clemson board because Dabo played at Bama. I pulled for both in State teams until about two years ago when I got tired of the treatment on this board. It did not matter what you said you were called a coot. I started pulling for SC but still am a die hard Bama fan and would never pull for anyone over Bama. .I have never posted or never will post under another name.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6321]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
lmao....
Jan 2, 2014, 5:57 PM
|
|
so you became a fan of just one team in SC because you were called a name???? LOLOLOL.
My version of the story is you came to TigerNet under a tiger screen name to try to "fool" people in thinking you were a Clemson fan. You were too embarrassed to use any chicken screen name...can't blame you for that. But your disguise was figured out very early.
If you post like a coot, act like a coot and lie like a coot.....you are a coot.
I would have thought Cally Gault would have taught to be honest, but I guess you were one of his few failures.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6321]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: every team during 0-21***
Jan 2, 2014, 6:12 PM
[ in reply to Re: every team during 0-21*** ] |
|
so you do care?
"I could care less about what happened to them in their past"
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20849]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14645
Joined: 2009
|
It's a shame really. Beat a horrible UT team and make the
Jan 2, 2014, 5:42 PM
[ in reply to Wow ] |
|
SECCG. Win that and play FSU for the natty. Oh well, at least you beat us again, and another team playing in a BCS game and all, so there's always the usual coot victory by association thing. Congrats.
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 4%
1
|
Re: It's a shame really. Beat a horrible UT team and make the
Jan 2, 2014, 6:27 PM
|
|
And if the Taters hadn't turn the ball over 6 times, USC didn't beat us we beat ourselves, blah, blah, blah
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2203]
TigerPulse: 81%
32
|
UT had a great year...
Jan 2, 2014, 5:57 PM
|
|
They beat the winner of the Citrus Bowl. They get rings next week.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Bigger fish to fry than SC?
Jan 2, 2014, 6:02 PM
|
|
Lol. Get over yourselves. I didn't know Clemson was in a position to set higher expectations than their rival who's beat them 5 years a row.
Clemson has an all-time winning percentage of 59%. Impressive stuff.
I have a lot of respect for Clemson's accomplishments, but it is hard for me to respect the fans who think their team and university is God's gift to the world.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Fact: We are going to a BCS bowl game this year
Jan 2, 2014, 6:08 PM
|
|
Fact: We've been in position to win our division or the ACC the last three years. Fact: We're going to a bowl game even with the SC loss.
So yes, as important as you guys think you are, you really haven't been of late. You are a non-conference game that hasn't ended up mattering 2 of the 3 last years. We blew our shot at the natty earlier in the year.
|
|
|
|
 |
null [null]
TigerPulse: 5%
-1
|
Re: Fact: We are going to a BCS bowl game this year
Jan 2, 2014, 11:03 PM
|
|
Enjoy it this year your 15 mins of fame are about over
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
LOL. "15 minutes of fame"...
Jan 2, 2014, 11:04 PM
|
|
Do you really not see the irony in that??
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20849]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14645
Joined: 2009
|
Clemson is God's gift to the Universe, my feathered
Jan 2, 2014, 7:55 PM
[ in reply to Bigger fish to fry than SC? ] |
|
friend, not just the world.
I'm curious though, how does one become a sad enough human being to feel compelled enough to sign in to a rival team's sports forum as often as you do and throw smack? Seems to me folks like you would be wallowing in the immense pride of 5 IN A ROW !!!! (Wow!) the big Cap On Bowl win over #19 Wisconsin (1st top 20 win ever in a bowl game - AWESOME!!!), hitting Spurrier's magic #11 wins AGAIN, and overall basking in the aura of his ability to go on the air drunk, subjugate the free press, and throw his coaches and players under the bus with absolutely no recourse. You must be very proud. Happy New Year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
That's because you play in the
Jan 2, 2014, 6:18 PM
|
|
ACC. Plain and simple. I'm not trying to be an SEC homer, but that is not that impressive. SC has finished ranked ahead of Clemson for a few years now, so it is not farfetched at all to think SC would be doing the same thing in the ACC.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
FSU is playing in the natty
Jan 2, 2014, 6:22 PM
|
|
You, on the other hand, play in the weaksauce SEC East. That is not impressive. And you haven't even been able to win it once. Ever. And you may never in our lifetimes.
You, on the other hand, got beat by UGA AND a bad TN. And you BARELY squeaked out a win against a Missou without their starting QB. You were also on the ropes against Wisco until their OC had an aneurysm and went full ######.
|
|
|
|
 |
Enthusiast [110]
TigerPulse: 14%
11
|
amazing the east is so bad
Jan 2, 2014, 6:19 PM
|
|
But yet UGA is Clemson's most notable win. Hmm
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
UGA was close to 100% when we played them
Jan 2, 2014, 6:23 PM
|
|
By the time you got them, they were already missing one of their best receivers, Gurley/Marshall were both nursing injuries, and a few others were similarly dinged.
But yes, the SEC East does suck. I think our most notable "win" is taking care of business against everyone we were supposed to, which is something your Gamehens failed to do (hello, TN).
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
You act like I'm comparing SC
Jan 2, 2014, 6:32 PM
|
|
to Alabama. What's your point? SC should've beaten UT, but they didn't. That is not a national championship team.
Please do not act like Clemson, on the other hand, was in contention for a national championship or that because they beat up on the ACC means they are better team than SC.
I'm not really sure what any of you are getting at. SC is a Top 15 team any way you slice it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
I was posting about Tennessee, what are you going on about?
Jan 2, 2014, 6:36 PM
|
|
Seems like a nerve has been struck.
If I wanted to p!ss on your mediocrity, I'd say something like:
"0 SEC conference championships." "1 division champ and a blowout in the SECCG by a real team." "0 BCS games. Ever. Not even at-large." "One of your coach's first words out of his mouth after winning a crap bowl against a crap team was a dig on Clemson."
You guys are pathetic and the real SEC teams laugh at you riding on their coattails.
That's what I would have said if I wanted to ramble on about how crap your program is. Alabama attitude, Vandy trophy case.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Lol
Jan 2, 2014, 6:44 PM
|
|
You are trying to downplay the success of your rival to make yourselves feel better about your team. This whole site does that.
I will be happy to add to your list of SC's futile past, but I don't see how that has any bearing on the present or the future of the program.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
In case you haven't noticed
Jan 2, 2014, 6:46 PM
|
|
We've done more than you have recently. We've got more recent division titles, a conference championship, and two BCS bowl appearances.
And that's the present reality. It's funny to see you guys strutting over to your rivals' boards like you've done something. The reality is that you have done even less than we have recently.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
And please keep up the narrative that
Jan 2, 2014, 6:47 PM
|
|
Clemson is somehow superior to SC because they have been to a BCS game. That just confirms the state of this rivalry now.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Also won the conference/division more and more recently
Jan 2, 2014, 6:48 PM
|
|
And that's two BCS games, thankyou. SCAR could have snagged an at-large bid like we did if they had taken care of lowly TN.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Hahaha
Jan 2, 2014, 6:49 PM
|
|
more than SC? That is entirely because you play in the ACC. SC has had some crucial losses but has spanked Clemson for 5 years and has been ranked higher than Clemson at the end of the year as well.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
SC plays in the SEC East
Jan 2, 2014, 6:51 PM
|
|
Your division is atrocious. And you STILL only won it once during your "glory days". The SEC East the last three years has been "Who wants to suck the least, enough to win the division and get brained by Alabama in the SECCG."
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
"SEC East"
Jan 2, 2014, 11:06 PM
|
|
More recently the (by far) least relevant side of the conference.
What exactly is your point?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Also, let's watch and see what FSU does against SEC U
Jan 2, 2014, 6:52 PM
[ in reply to Hahaha ] |
|
SEC likes to ride on Bama's coattails, after all. I guess we can do the same with FSU.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
The two new SEC teams sure have struggled
Jan 2, 2014, 7:37 PM
[ in reply to Hahaha ] |
|
After being middling-average in their former conference. Instead, Missouri wins the very division that you were unable to stumble your way through, and A&M has seen much more success.
There hasn't even been a full four year cycle to see a recruiting difference, so what is it?
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Do any of you realize
Jan 2, 2014, 6:52 PM
|
|
that SC would have been chosen over Clemson for the BCS games if it was not for the bowl tie-ins?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Woulda coulda shoulda
Jan 2, 2014, 7:35 PM
|
|
You could have snagged the SEC's at-large bid if you guys were as good as you think you are.
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Yeah, it's Clemson's fault the ACC is playing for the
Jan 2, 2014, 10:35 PM
[ in reply to Do any of you realize ] |
|
national title.
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
UGA, UT say hello. THAT's why you were stuck playing in
Jan 2, 2014, 10:36 PM
[ in reply to Do any of you realize ] |
|
that meaningless bowl.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1880]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
"IF" is the most used word by USuC fans. Always has been.
Jan 3, 2014, 12:05 AM
[ in reply to Do any of you realize ] |
|
nm
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
I expect FSU to win.
Jan 2, 2014, 6:55 PM
|
|
What's your point?
I will end this by saying that SC will again finish higher than Clemson in every poll. I'm pretty sure that says it all, but I'm sure sure some of you will claim even the mascot challenge has an SEC bias.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
That's as meaningless as saying
Jan 2, 2014, 7:34 PM
|
|
"Clemson will go to more BCS bowl games than SCAR" or "Clemson will win more BCS bowl games than SCAR".
Rankings matter if you are in the national championship hunt, but neither of us are or will be next year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: That's as meaningless as saying
Jan 2, 2014, 10:26 PM
|
|
Yes, and South Carolina has gone into Chapel Hill and planted the tar heels. Something you have yet o do and SC has been out of the ACC for 24 years. They also have won the ACC tournament and two Baseball nat. Championships. Clemson bought one Football championship and if you want to play like that did not happen just ask You're own conference who put more penalties on you and you're own President, athletic director and board of directors who fired your coach.
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Are you really going there Motor City Coot?
Jan 2, 2014, 10:28 PM
|
|
When was the last time you won an NCAA tournament game in basketball?
I S S U E S
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Hah, you guys love those UNC/USF wins
Jan 2, 2014, 10:40 PM
[ in reply to Re: That's as meaningless as saying ] |
|
UNC is GARBAGE this year. You did what you were SUPPOSED to do. You don't get a pat on the back for that.
You are currently suspended for violations of your own. These aided you in getting to your "golden years". It's also possible that more will surface with time, like they tend to do after the fact.
This is the football board, I won't even respond to your other sport stuff. You are just reaching deep at this point. Your program is a flash in the pan, and I am going to enjoy the spiral when Spurrier leaves.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4867]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
Re: That's as meaningless as saying
Jan 2, 2014, 11:01 PM
[ in reply to Re: That's as meaningless as saying ] |
|
So I have to ask, since you finally owned up to being a coot...why are you still here?
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4610]
TigerPulse: 62%
37
|
Tennessee did beat SCAR***
Jan 2, 2014, 10:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: Tennessee did beat SCAR***
Jan 2, 2014, 11:04 PM
|
|
It doesn't matter if SC lost to Auburn, Tenn.or Georgia that you beat or say you could have beat,because heads up five years in a row South Carolina beat YOU! And it wasn't even close. what's more is they will do it again next year with he same QB that already beat you in you're house last year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Cootstripe...
Jan 2, 2014, 11:08 PM
|
|
Anyone with an ounce of football knowledge knows Thompson beat us in 2011 because our secondary was weak and lost 3 starters during the seasoon.
LOL. We will punish that stiff.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
And yet here we are. Going to a BCS bowl game.
Jan 2, 2014, 11:12 PM
[ in reply to Re: Tennessee did beat SCAR*** ] |
|
Where did you go, again? And who was your worthy opponent?
Oh...
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8928]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11812
Joined: 2011
|
WHY did you have to wake up the COOTS!?!?!
Jan 2, 2014, 11:09 PM
|
|
Like hunting in a baited field. SUCKERS!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: WHY did you have to wake up the COOTS!?!?!
Jan 3, 2014, 12:00 AM
|
|
that's alright, we can go to bed knowing we are on top now and no matter what you say can't change that! And it sure won't change next year either!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
"top" at your Capital One bowl :)
Jan 3, 2014, 12:01 AM
|
|
We've got bigger fish to fry.
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
One word, Motor City Cockstripe...
Jan 3, 2014, 12:03 AM
[ in reply to Re: WHY did you have to wake up the COOTS!?!?! ] |
|
I S S U E S.
Do you take medication? Serious question. Please don't skip doses when logging into Tigernet.
By the way, how long before you log in with "CUGradFan06"?
|
|
|
|
Replies: 73
| visibility 1279
|
|
|