|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101300]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 48721
Joined: 2009
|
Adam Humphries seemed so open during FSU game but no touches
Oct 26, 2013, 12:11 PM
|
|
when it seemed possible Tajh could have used him more when pressed for an open receiver. I hope Adam will be used more today when possible.
What say you?
GoTiGERs..beat the Terps & bring some Turtle Soup home!
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4443]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Adam Humphries seemed so open during FSU game but no touches
Oct 26, 2013, 12:15 PM
|
|
i think what happened, is what we've seen happen a few times before: Tajh gets rattled, he knows he's playing a stout defense, he locks in on Nuk or Sammy and forces throws. I think he was dropping back or rolling with Sammy in mind about 80 percent of the time instead of looking downfield for open WR's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7294]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 10321
Joined: 1998
|
Humphries is open a lot and........
Oct 26, 2013, 12:16 PM
|
|
Boyd only seemed to take advantage of it in the Syracuse game. But you are correct, Adam was open often in the FSU game and it was noticed by many. And it wasn't always about the pressure. TB locks in on only one receiver far too often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [151]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
I told my friends around me the same thing.
Oct 26, 2013, 12:21 PM
|
|
He was open many times on the skinny post or slant. Basically went uncovered. TB was seemed to be set to throw it deep and burn the Noles. Didn't work out so well for us. Regroup. Refocus. And WIN!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20899]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14665
Joined: 2009
|
Sammy had to signal Tajh on one of Humphries' TD's
Oct 26, 2013, 1:04 PM
|
|
in the Syracuse game. He was pointing to get Tajh to see that Adam was wide open 20 yards further downfield, and even then Boyd delayed a bit before heaving the TD toss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [66205]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 49624
Joined: 2000
|
I hope Tajh is able to get the ball to any of our open
Oct 26, 2013, 12:24 PM
|
|
receivers instead of locking onto one guy and throwing into coverage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [79945]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 120684
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Last week Seckinger
Oct 26, 2013, 12:24 PM
|
|
may have been the most useless human being I've ever seen play football. a liability from the get go
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [66205]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 49624
Joined: 2000
|
He did have a bad game, but so did a lot of other players.
Oct 26, 2013, 12:30 PM
|
|
Seckinger's screw-ups just happened to be very obvious. All-in-all, I think Seckinger has had a pretty good year, especially for a redshirt freshman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2587]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Dude...
Oct 26, 2013, 12:33 PM
[ in reply to Re: Last week Seckinger ] |
|
useless player?? How soon we forget that he made TD that enabled Tigers to beat the Dawgs...very noble of you to put him under the bus because he had a bad day. I am sure he hates it worse than you do...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [79945]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 120684
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Dude...
Oct 26, 2013, 12:37 PM
|
|
I remember it well. But he killed us last week. didnt do squat in a postive way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2587]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
He did not deserve...
Oct 26, 2013, 12:42 PM
|
|
to be singled out & categorized as being useless...other players were not stepping up as well during the game. They are college football players...not pros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [616]
TigerPulse: 93%
21
|
Would love to see Humphries used more. He's solid.***
Oct 26, 2013, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
