Replies: 35
| visibility 250
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46627
Joined: 2012
|
Front Page Story: Sturgis: A week one win for the ACC
Sep 6, 2013, 1:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9937]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11193
Joined: 2003
|
Stop perpetuating conference talk. The UGA game was....
Sep 6, 2013, 1:40 PM
|
|
a win for CLEMSON and no one else. Don't really care about other teams performance.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15407]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 10792
Joined: 1999
|
^^^^ THIS ^^^^
Sep 6, 2013, 1:51 PM
|
|
So over the conference story line. Just drop it already.
I pull for Clemson, to hell with everyone else. I could care less what conference UGA is in. They could be in WAC for all I care. They're a #### good football team, and we beat them.
Enough of the conference flag waving. Stop it already!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Would you "Only care about Clemson" crowd
Sep 6, 2013, 1:52 PM
[ in reply to Stop perpetuating conference talk. The UGA game was.... ] |
|
be upset if Clemson went undefeated against all the nobodies YOU want the ACC to be, beat UGA/USuCk, then got locked outside the MNC, because of how weak the ACC is?
Wake up or at least act like you know what's up.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43148]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43564
Joined: 1998
|
How many times has that happened before
Sep 6, 2013, 2:33 PM
|
|
ZERO!
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [415]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
Boise State and Utah.***
Sep 6, 2013, 2:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Yes, and Utah got shafted hard that year with all the teams
Sep 6, 2013, 3:19 PM
|
|
they beat in the top 15-20.
|
|
|
|
 |
Starter [353]
TigerPulse: 92%
16
|
Neither of them
Sep 6, 2013, 3:43 PM
|
|
were in a BCS Conference.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
There was more top 15-20 teams in Utah's conference that
Sep 6, 2013, 3:48 PM
|
|
year than the BCSs...maybe not the SEC, but all others.
Utah got screwed bc of fan base issues, I believe.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43148]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43564
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Only reason 1 undefeated team didn't set and watch the
Sep 6, 2013, 3:34 PM
[ in reply to How many times has that happened before ] |
|
other play Bama last year was because Ohio St was on probation.
Last I checked Ohio St, Bama, and Oregon are ahead of us. Stanford and Michigan will also be in the picture. Another point is the SEC will make a push soon as they start playing each other. If UsuCk don't live up to their ranking all we have is UGA week 1 without a strong ACC showing.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6101]
TigerPulse: 85%
40
Posts: 10117
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Would you "Only care about Clemson" crowd
Sep 6, 2013, 3:33 PM
[ in reply to Would you "Only care about Clemson" crowd ] |
|
We can't change the lackluster competition in the ACC. That's why it's not worth talking about or claiming membership in.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [230]
TigerPulse: 59%
13
|
Re: Would you "Only care about Clemson" crowd
Sep 6, 2013, 6:49 PM
[ in reply to Would you "Only care about Clemson" crowd ] |
|
I agree. Conference perception hurt the Big East in terms of Football. The ACC is considered inferior to the SEC, BIG 10, PAC-12, and BIG 12 and that perception was apparent in Clemson and FSU's BCS rankings last season.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7936]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 13712
Joined: 2002
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [847]
TigerPulse: 96%
23
|
Re: I agree...it was a win for Clemson and Clemson alone***
Sep 6, 2013, 2:05 PM
|
|
A win by anyone we beat or lose to helps our rankings.... if we make it to the NC, the Orange or another BCS bowl everyone in the conference profits... I want the ACC to have 2 teams in the BCS.... more money in our pockets. I hope one of them is us! I pull for ACC teams most of the time... except UNC hardly ever.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Time Great [88590]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 81635
Joined: 1999
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [415]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
You must have the IQ of Forrest Gump
Sep 6, 2013, 2:43 PM
[ in reply to Stop perpetuating conference talk. The UGA game was.... ] |
|
In the new world of billion dollar TV contracts for CFB winning games like this is good for not just us, but the ACC as well, which in turn will benefit us by receiving more money from larger TV contracts in the future.
Time to pull for Miami next week. And FSU when they play UF no matter how much I hate both teams. For Clemson's sake you should care about other teams performances.
Cannot figure out how a few select folks do not understand this concept.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
no. we understand. it's the pulling for the conference thing
Sep 6, 2013, 2:58 PM
|
|
that we don't like. do they (acc teams) need to get better, HE** YES, do we have to pull for them, HE** NO. can't you see a little difference there? come on, it's not rocket science. we know they need to improve, BUT WE AIN'T GOT TO PULL FOR THEM!
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [415]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
no you don't understand......
Sep 6, 2013, 3:05 PM
|
|
I hate those teams too. But you should pull for them because THAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF CLEMSON ATHLETICS.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
why ? i said they need to improve their level of play. if i
Sep 6, 2013, 7:39 PM
|
|
am pulling for them, or not, HAS NO CONSEQUENCE WHATSOEVER! please tell me where i am wrong in this theory. i have been to 1(ONE) count'em 1, game involving an acc team other than clemson (without us being in it) and that was an old kick-off classic game in the meadowlands between nc state and iowa, and to my chagrin, my kids and i both hollered for the acc , but that was because we sat 1 aisle over from the iowa band and they had already tee'd me off with their antics.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
For real? You must not have enjoyed UL toasting FLA in the
Sep 7, 2013, 12:53 AM
|
|
Sugar.
Do you watch any games other than when Clemson plays? BCS Bowls? When you do you must chose a team you prefer to win. It's nature to do so.
I for one could careless about FLA, due to that slimy coach of theirs, to the point I will root for any team on their schedule not named USuCk or UGA. This week's bonus is a win by Miami makes beating Miami a quality win for FSU/GT/Us, so heck yeah I'm pulling for the Canes tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [5330]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
Posts: 10336
Joined: 2002
|
I don't understand why i HAVE to pull for the ACC
Sep 6, 2013, 7:12 PM
[ in reply to no. we understand. it's the pulling for the conference thing ] |
|
People say you should pull for your conference... but ACC teams are going to either win or lose football games whether I cheer for them on my couch or not..
|
|
|
|
 |
Rock Defender [72]
TigerPulse: 95%
8
|
A few select folks?
Sep 6, 2013, 3:53 PM
[ in reply to You must have the IQ of Forrest Gump ] |
|
This board is rampant with people who ignorantly think that by pulling against the rest of our conference it makes them a better Tiger fan. I don't like any of the other ACC conference schools either and obviously want to beat everyone on our schedule, but it ENHANCES Clemson's record to beat quality opponents whether they be in the ACC or any other conference. I just don't get this attitude that a lot of folks have where they don't want any of our ACC brethren to win inter-conference games. Good luck trying to get through to them.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [415]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
Probably non-clemson grads....
Sep 6, 2013, 4:31 PM
|
|
Clemson grads would have enough intelligence to understand this concept.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43148]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43564
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
It doesn't but when a person tells me they are a college
Sep 7, 2013, 1:04 AM
|
|
football fan and have no preference throughout any games but Clemson games I know they are lying.
Again, it is nature to pull for one team or another, no matter the impact.
Great players come to play in big games and the better our competition is week in and week out, the bigger the # of stud players are interested in Clemson. More light is shed on the SEC Coaches' lies during recruiting.
Look at Chad's statement on recruits calling in after last weeks win, genius.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [275]
TigerPulse: 77%
14
|
Re: Stop perpetuating conference talk. The UGA game was....
Sep 7, 2013, 8:33 AM
[ in reply to Stop perpetuating conference talk. The UGA game was.... ] |
|
Got to say it even though it will do no good! Good gosh grow up. The other teams being better means more money for Clemson. Can't you figure that out,or do you have to be hit over the head. .? You think Scar got better because of the school, no they joined the money and if we don't ride the wave, we will be Wake Forest in a few years. Like I said, deaf ears,but I feel better anyway. Lol.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14935]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 12319
Joined: 2006
|
Headline should read: "Tigers Reluctant to Carry
Sep 6, 2013, 2:06 PM
|
|
Conference Banner Everyone Wants Them To; Don't Give #### About ACC"
That might not fit though
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [40330]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 22707
Joined: 2003
|
Sir Don't Ever Compare a Clemson Game to Notre Dame
Sep 6, 2013, 2:07 PM
|
|
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22911]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 15724
Joined: 2012
|
where's GoldenHomer when you need him***
Sep 6, 2013, 2:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2469]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Thought this was something with BikeWeek & Clemson :(***
Sep 6, 2013, 2:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43148]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43564
Joined: 1998
|
The ACC got SPANKED by the SEC except for CLEMSON
Sep 6, 2013, 2:32 PM
|
|
the others beat some scrubs
|
|
|
|
 |
Team Captain [461]
TigerPulse: 97%
18
|
Gotta ask......
Sep 6, 2013, 2:56 PM
|
|
Have to ask you again what's the deal with the pic of Leslie van houten?
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69791]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90831
Joined: 2001
|
Pi$$ on the ACC. It was a win for Clemson (PERIOD).***
Sep 6, 2013, 3:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 35
| visibility 250
|
|
|