|
Replies: 10
| visibility 2654
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [109432]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 27125
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [32471]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 24184
Joined: 2002
|
Kinda sounds like nobody is next
Nov 5, 2021, 10:16 AM
|
|
2022 class may be done
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [599]
TigerPulse: 97%
20
|
2022 is not done
Nov 5, 2021, 12:20 PM
|
|
No chance they are done. 4-5 more at minimum. One coming in a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [599]
TigerPulse: 97%
20
|
2022 is not done
Nov 5, 2021, 12:22 PM
[ in reply to Kinda sounds like nobody is next ] |
|
No chance they are done. 4-5 more at minimum. One coming in a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5519]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Recruiting article
Nov 5, 2021, 10:26 AM
|
|
There isn't any logical reason to only take 13 in any class. At some point we have to balance out the classes and even if we take 23 to 25 every year, those leaving early for the draft, those portalling away and those graduating or choosing to move on will even out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11484]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Recruiting article
Nov 5, 2021, 12:34 PM
|
|
I think most would expect for Dabo to have at least a slight change in recruiting philosophy after this season. That doesn't mean it's definite, but logic wouldn't expect him to keep shrinking the scholarship numbers.
I'm not sure if that change results in larger classes, giving a little on exploring the portal or maybe some combination of both.
If it does cause a change in Dabo's recruiting philosophy, it will be interesting to see if Clemson chooses to increase offers to some lesser prospects to finish out this recruiting cycle and fill this class or if Clemson just starts to send out more offers in the '23 class and beyond when they feel they still have a chance to get larger numbers of higher caliber players.
Obviously this class desperately needs to increase above 13, but I am torn on whether I would send out offers to lower level players just to fill numbers.
Clemson is in a tough spot for '22 recruiting and I'm starting to think this is going to be the first class where the lack of bodies overshadow the quality of the guys coming to campus (which is impressive right now).
At some point it's just not enough players replacing the number of guys leaving no matter how talented each player may be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9595]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Recruiting article
Nov 5, 2021, 1:16 PM
|
|
I'd guess its a little late for a complete shift in recruiting philosophy in the 2022 class but I would assume we will add 4-5 more before all is said and done. 2023 is where we need to see some major course corrections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [-100]
TigerPulse: 50%
-1
|
Etienne?
Nov 5, 2021, 1:28 PM
|
|
Kinda strange....he put Clemson in his top 5.
But his top 5 include FLA (dumpster fire), LSU (soon to be dumpster fire with 2x of the top RB's for 2022 already committed) and UGA (who took the #2 RB in the nation for 2022)...leaving Texas A&M and Clemson.
Texas A&M is MUCH closer to his home, they're in the SEC, have no RB commits for 2022.....and I'm not sure I trust our newest RB coach after losing 4 RB's to the portal since last season.
Just me or is anyone else skeptical of Trevor coming to Clemson?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4231]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Recruiting article
Nov 5, 2021, 2:45 PM
|
|
yikes to that if we are "done" with only three scholarship running backs next year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [110]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Might be be the year we hit up
Nov 5, 2021, 2:59 PM
|
|
The transfer portal if we miss on the rest and only have 13-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7898]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Might be be the year we hit up
Nov 5, 2021, 4:34 PM
|
|
Well, if we’re depth stretched now due to injuries and the portal, how does adding only 13 make sense or effectively work out for the better?
Not being negative, I’m asking because I don’t know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 2654
|
|
|
50
