GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNETs™ to grant this post a special award and grant the author bonus TNETs™!


YOUR BALANCE
monetization_on
2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 69  

2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

emoji_events [9]
Jan 13, 2017, 6:58 PM

QB-Zerrick Cooper, Kelly Bryant/Johnson
RB-Feaster, Fuller, Choice
WR-Deon Cain, Overton/Higgins
WR-Ray Ray/Cornell Powell, Amari Rodgers
WR-Hunter Renfrow, TrevionThompson/Chase
TE-Milan Richard, Garret Williams
RT-Sean Pollard, Anchrum
RG-Tyrone Crowder,Maverick Morris
C-Falcinelli, Cervenka
LG-Hearn, Simpson
LT-Hyatt, Anchrum

DE-Ferrell, Xavier Kelly
DT-Dex, Huggins
DT- Wilkins, Pagano
DE- Bryant, Yeargin
WLB-Shaq Smith/Jalen Williams
MLB-Kendall Joseph, Tre Lamar
SLB-O'Daniel, Williams/Davis
CB-Trayvon Mullen, Ryan Carter
SS-Van Smith, Korrin Wiggins/Wallace
FS-Tanner Muse/Isaiah Simmons
CB-Mark Fields, Edmonds/Baker
Nickel-Ryan Carter, K'Von Wallace.

K-Huegel
P-Spiers
PR-Ray Ray/Powell/Feaster/Higgins
KR-Same as above but with Fuller

2017 commits who could be in line for early and often playing time:
Higgins, Rodgers, Johnson, Terrell, Brockhurst, Rudolph

I could see this team winning anywhere from 10 to 12 games. Only ones I think are in doubt, and I use that term lightly, are Auburn since it's so early in the season and FSU cause they are returning a lot on D and they have a proven QB. Talent wise they are the only team close to us in the ACC and on our schedule in general.

Thoughts?

flag link

Seems to be close... +1.***

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 7:07 PM



2022 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link


Re: Seems to be close... +1.***

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 7:24 PM

FSU is my main worry.......as usual

2022 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link

monter le cheval de fer
A coot will usually blink when hit in the head with a ball-peen hammer


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:10 PM

Louisville has some pretty nice talent, their D will be pretty tough next year.

I agree with you though.

2022 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 7:13 PM

Pretty sure that Louisville loses pretty much all of their defense. They also lost their Defensive Coordinator.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:14 PM

Still not easy on the road against a QB who put up over 400 yards on us.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:16 PM

Understood but as crazy as this sounds I believe our defense will be better and more athletic next year...which results in having a better chance of slowing him down. He may have put up over 400 but if I remember correctly most were in 2nd half and on the ground

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:24 PM

I do think the D could be better. We contained him good in the first half correct but he is a great player.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:24 PM

He is a great athlete with elite speed and a strong inaccurate arm. Sort of like JT Barret but faster

flag link

And he had extra 5 possessions by our


Jan 15, 2017, 9:29 AM

turnovers

military_donation.jpg flag link


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 15, 2017, 11:27 AM

But how many 4-5 star rejects and jucos are they taking? This IS UL after all...

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:14 PM

Yeah they do return I think 5-6 on D. But to hurt Jacksons' accuracy even more he is losing top 2 receivers, best TE and his RB.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:13 PM

Fuller will start IMO everything else seems on point. Will be interesting to see how WLB turns out.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 7:14 PM

I think Feaster will start cause on the extra gear and dynamic ability.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:17 PM

He will have to improve tremendously all around. Fuller knows the plays and blocking. He also ran very well this year. It will be a 1 2 punch either way as both will get reps. Even Choice should see a lot of PT he is a fine back and will have another yea removed from injury.

flag link

Tra Lamar


Jan 15, 2017, 11:18 AM

Yea, I have been asking for a couple weeks what people's thoughts were at WILL.
Wondering does Lamar move from Mike to WILL, or does Smith start.


At RB..
may not happen right away. But Feaster will take over #1, IMO

#21

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 7:14 PM

We have a solid lineup, lots of depth. I feel Auburn is a win, but FSU and at Loserville will be a problem.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 10:49 PM

I'm willing to bet Clemson will be favored in every game,including Louisville and Florida state.

flag link

At Va tech too.***


Jan 15, 2017, 11:19 AM



flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:28 PM

Not to get too far ahead but depending on QB play and the ability to score points, we should legitimately be strong playoff contenders again. It will take two RB's to replace the complete player (blocking & running) that Gallman was but I think we have that in Fuller & Feaster. Ray Ray for Tay will be nearly even swap if RR can hold onto the ball.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:29 PM

By Tay are you meaning Artavis Scott? Cause he declared for the draft

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:34 PM

Yep, I meant Tay. Ray Ray should slide into his starting spot.

flag link

I'd be shocked if Carter isn't starting at CB


Jan 13, 2017, 7:31 PM

Seeing as he started this year. Fuller starts at RB. Watch Chad Smith at Will.

Going to be fun to watch the competitions at QB, RB, C, Will, CB and S this spring.

flag link

Re: I'd be shocked if Carter isn't starting at CB

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 7:37 PM

Only reason I didn't put Carter as starter at CB is because Mullen is going to develop quickly. Dude is a beast. Carter is great but Mullen is a legit CB. Cater is flexible hints the Nickel spot

flag link

Carter is not...


Jan 15, 2017, 11:20 AM

the answer, was burnt constantly.


IMO, our Corners were the weak link from 2016.

#21

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:36 PM

Where is nyles Pinckney, is he not working out?

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 7:38 PM

He is just not as talented as the ones I listed IMO

flag link

He's a senior, he starts. if he's good enough


Jan 13, 2017, 7:49 PM

to start over them on a Championship team, he'll start next year. He brings a toughness our other CB's don't

flag link

Re: He's a senior, he starts. if he's good enough


Jan 13, 2017, 7:54 PM

Our opinions are different. No matter the class, best player, plays.

flag link

Only other senior starter is O'Daniel


Jan 13, 2017, 8:09 PM

and he comes out for Nickel. They have confidence in Carter. You're breaking in one new CB, Carter knows what he's doing, Knows the system. Fields busts all the time and Mullen hardly saw the field. Game 1 is likely to be Carter and Edmund.

flag link

Re: Only other senior starter is O'Daniel


Jan 13, 2017, 8:18 PM

Lol Carter is probably one of my favorite players on the team. But you aren't understanding that Mullen was a 5 star outta high school and looked unreal when he played. Also O'Daniel doesn't "come in" as the Nickel he starts at OLB. Not gonna argue with some old guy behind a keyboard about what could happen 8 months from now less than a week off of a championship.

flag link

You need to read it again

[2]
Jan 13, 2017, 8:35 PM

Says O'Daniel comes out for Nickel. Mullen hardly played, if he looked great it was garbage time. Tre Lamar is a five star, but he's not starting over three star Kendall Joseph.

If Shaq Smith doesn't get his sssignments down he won't start at Will.

Smith and Johnson were not as talented at safety this year as Green and Kearse were last year, but they were better. They didn't bust near as much. Knowing assignments and having good technique means something. Our coaches learned that when it basically cost us a championship last year.

flag link

Re: You need to read it again


Jan 13, 2017, 8:40 PM

Haha you obviously can't take it when someone has a different opinion than you. I know who was higher rated. I pay attention to recruiting closer than you honestly. But whatever I'm sure you will disagree with that also hahaha have a good night ######

flag link

Well at least you're a humble little expert***

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 8:43 PM



flag link

Re: Well at least you're a humble little expert***


Jan 13, 2017, 8:44 PM

No not an expert I just have an opinion that is different than yours and you are so immature that you can't accept that.

flag link

So you post what for the most part is probably

[2]
Jan 13, 2017, 8:48 PM

pretty close but now resort to insults when someone disagrees with you? I thought we were debating, I didn't mean to send you into a hissy

flag link

Re: So you post what for the most part is probably


Jan 13, 2017, 8:52 PM

Once again not in a hissy. I'm trying to figure out why you can grasp the fact the people have different opinions than you. I'm thoroughly enjoying you accusing me off being in a "hissy" though since you know me and all hahahha

flag link

Re: You need to read it again

[2]
Jan 14, 2017, 12:30 AM

Reading all of your comments makes it appear that you are the one who can't handle people having different opinions from yours. Also, you just joined TigerNet in 2016. What makes you such an instant expert?

2022 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link

Re: You need to read it again

[1]
Jan 14, 2017, 10:51 PM

Hahahahhaha wow that's cute. So in order for anyone to be an "expert" the qualifications are that you have to be a TigerNet memeber for a certain number of years? I apologize. I didn't realize that in order to be an expert or even a fan of Clemson you had to be a member of this site for years on end. I thought me going to Clemson games since I was 3 and now being 22 showed I am a Clemson fan and a die hard one at that. By the way, never claimed to be an expert but I did have different opinions than the other person to whom couldn't accept my differing opinions. But apparently the "loyalties" on TigerNet are officially based on who has been a member the longest. Been reading these boards for 5-6 years just never thought about joining til this past year.

flag link

You need to learn the difference between "not accepting"

[1]
Jan 14, 2017, 11:31 PM

and disagreeing and debating. You post an opinion on a message board, people are going to disagree. Stop taking it so personal

flag link

Re: You need to learn the difference between "not accepting"


Jan 14, 2017, 11:51 PM

Right back at ya.

flag link

Let's see now


Jan 14, 2017, 11:55 PM

I never once called you immature. Never said you could not take someone disagreeing with you. Just stated my opinion.

I didn't have to say you were immature, you've revealed that on your own

flag link

Re: Let's see now


Jan 15, 2017, 12:20 AM

I'm not immature. I posted my opinion on depth chart. You stated your opinion I then stated it was your opinion and I disagreed and you kept on and on trying to convince me that your opinions were factual. Your opinions are just that, they are your opinions. No matter what you say about certain players it won't change how I feel about them haha. But in all seriousness it is what it is I guess no matter what team you are a fan of whether the same or not, you are gonna butt heads with other people. So with that being said I consider this "hissy" over with, have yourself a good night.

flag link

Yes, you are immature.

[1]
Jan 15, 2017, 2:00 AM

It's painfully obvious.

2022 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link

Cobbox on Brad Brownell: “His only problem is he has to deal with turd fans questioning every move he makes.”


Re: Yes, you are immature.


Jan 15, 2017, 7:49 AM

Whatever you say pal, I'm not the one jumping into a conversation 2 days after the thread was posted, just to have my voice heard.

flag link

You do understand that debate is attempting to convince someone

[1]
Jan 15, 2017, 7:59 AM

of your opinion don't you? Do you also realize a sign of immaturity is not realizing you are immature, and deflecting your behavior on to others?

flag link

Re: You do understand that debate is attempting to convince someone


Jan 15, 2017, 8:09 AM

Still not immature, I do know what debating is. I've been reading these boards for years and honestly I think it is bull$h!t how all the people who have been "members" the longest think they run this site. They think they are the only ones who are right. And by god if someone disagrees with those people they are either accused of being a coot or ganged up on because the loyalties lie with who has been on this site for the longest. And once again I attempted to bring this convo to a stop and no shocker that you had a smart a$$ remark to make.

flag link

Has nothing to do with tenure on here***


Jan 15, 2017, 8:15 AM



flag link

Re: Yes, you are immature.

[1]
Jan 15, 2017, 8:01 AM

You told striper good night and then responded 8 more times.

flag link

Re: Yes, you are immature.


Jan 15, 2017, 8:06 AM

And you had time to literally count those responses? Haha, I'm assuming people are gonna defend you to since I'm betting you have been a member on TigerNet longer? Seems to be the end all be all on this site.

flag link

Re: Yes, you are immature.


Jan 15, 2017, 8:36 AM

I was just pointing something out,both of yall let it go we are all Tiger fans here regardless of who stacks up on the depth chart you,me,and striper will be pulling for them to succeed.

flag link

You're correct, I should have just bowed


Jan 15, 2017, 8:14 AM

out. No sense is attempting to discuss and debate on a message board built on discussing and debating Clemson athletics.

flag link

Re: Only other senior starter is O'Daniel


Jan 13, 2017, 8:28 PM

A long time till September, but you may be right.

2022 white level memberbadge-donor-25yr.jpg flag link

null


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 8:33 PM

RS this year I believe. He could get in the mix.

flag link

Who does he replace?


Jan 15, 2017, 11:22 AM

Wilkins?
Lawrence?
Huggins?
Pagano?



#21

flag link

Just giddy at the center of our D Line. Man oh man.***


Jan 13, 2017, 8:12 PM



flag link

Bockhorst

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 8:33 PM

had major knee surgery his senior year in high school. I doubt we throw a true freshman - one year post major knee surgery - in a game when so many other options are available.

2022 white level memberbadge-donor-25yr.jpg flag link

null


John Simpson


Jan 15, 2017, 11:23 AM

wondering if Simpson over takes Hearn at LG.


Going be hard keeping BIG JOHN off the field.
#21

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 8:55 PM

I think everybody is going to be very happy when they see Chase Brice QB out of Grayson Ga. 6'3" 205 Had 3,000 yards passing this year with 33 TD'S. Won State Championship in 7A. Team finished number 4 in the Nation. Four year starter at big time High School in Georgia. Same school as Wayne Gallman, Ryan Carter and Nick Schuessler. He will be in the mix.

military_donation.jpg flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Jan 13, 2017, 9:09 PM

Where are Tucker Israel, Chad Smith, and Sterling Johnson?

2022 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 13, 2017, 10:28 PM

I don't know maybe partying or in bed sleeping right now. Don't know where they are

flag link

I hate to single out one player, but one of our DBs


Jan 13, 2017, 10:47 PM

needs to step it up or slide down the depth chart: Van Smith.
He whiffed on several tackles in the Bama game.

And we sure as heck better coach up ALL the DBs to look for the ball. Otherwise we will be watching a PI parade next year. we were fortunate that OSU and Bama didn't have a great passing game.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link

Our Dline makes for easy work in our secondary.***


Jan 15, 2017, 10:32 AM



2022 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link

I'm thinking Rudolph might be Redshirt. Didn't he injure ACL***


Jan 14, 2017, 10:55 PM



flag link

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Jan 14, 2017, 11:01 PM

Pretty close. Chad smith and specifically Tre Lamar will be hard to keep off the field .

Also on Mullen. Think Mackenzie 2.0. This offseason will be huge for him.

flag link


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 14, 2017, 11:06 PM

That's what I was trying to explain to certain people on this thread. Mullen is unreal.

flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 14, 2017, 11:42 PM

Muse came in after van smith took the bait on the oj Howard wheel right.

flag link


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 15, 2017, 2:39 AM

I believe that Tucker Israel is going to a serious contender for the QB spot. Why is he not listed?

military_donation.jpg flag link

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Jan 15, 2017, 6:05 AM

I wouldn't count out Brice yet. Someone very close to the program thinks he is good enough to play too. Seems we have a lot more options at QB than I can ever remember.

flag link

Looks fairly accurate


Jan 15, 2017, 11:16 AM

I am sure Higgins will move up the depth Chart quickly, opposite of Cain.
And I wonder if Lamar will stay at MIKE
Can Simmons claim a starting safety role

#21

flag link

Replies: 69  
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
8005 people have read this post