»
Topic: Thoughts on the non-targeting call...
Replies: 13   Last Post: Jan 8, 2019, 12:32 PM by: clemson2003®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 13  

Thoughts on the non-targeting call...

[1]
Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:05 PM
 

Helmet to helmet on TL by #30 Mack Wilson at 13:56 2nd qtr

nullbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


Shoulda been called.

[2]
Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:06 PM
 

Not much else to think about.

2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Shoulda been called.

[1]
Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:15 PM
 

Watching the ESPN Field Pass replay on the U and not ONE of these idiots mentioned that it should have been targeting.


Re: Shoulda been called.

[2]
Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:18 PM
 

Also the late hit on Higgins in the end zone after his catch.

2021 orange level member


They did call that, enforced on KO***


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:18 PM
 




Yup... Field Pass was so Bama biased

[1]
Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:18 PM
 

At least the main broadcast had mentioned his. TL might be 1 inch shorter today.

nullbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


Re: Yup... Field Pass was so Bama biased


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:20 PM
 

It sure got quiet when Trevon intercepted that deep ball...loving it


Re: Thoughts on the non-targeting call...


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:19 PM
 

TL lowered his head, which probably negated a targeting call. However, I've seen it still called. PAC12 refs not used to physical play like that I guess.


Re: Thoughts on the non-targeting call...


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:27 PM
 

I agree, TL lowering his head probably prevented that one being called. We did get the personal foul for hit out of bounds and a roughing the passer on the same play Tee was hit after his TD. Muse had a questionable one on Tua so maybe they averaged out. I just can't believe there weren't 70 holding calls against Bama (every play).

Penalties Last Night

Tigers - 1 for 12 yards
Bama - 6 for 60 yards

2021 white level member

Re: Thoughts on the non-targeting call...


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:32 PM
 

Yeah, I think the lowering of the head made it at least questionable enough to where they didn't want to call it there in such an important game. I personally didn't have a problem with not calling this as the refs were pretty consistent all night IMO with letting the players decide the game on the field.

2021 white level member

Wasn't Lawrence the ball carrier on that play?


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:21 PM
 

You almost never see targeting called on a hit on the ball carrier.

2021 white level member

There was an incidental one on Turner that a nitpicker coulda called


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:22 PM
 

So just as well let it be.. Trevor didn't react so that's the best outcome


There was an incidental one on Turner that a nitpicker coulda called


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:22 PM
 

So just as well let it be.. Trevor didn't react so that's the best outcome


I wanted a call but...


Posted: Jan 8, 2019, 12:29 PM
 

I considered that Trevor was a running back and the hit wasn't vicious. Kids are taught to put their helmets on the ball. Everyone knew it was going to happen including Trevor. I don't think I've seen this called on a running back.

2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg

Replies: 13  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 2021 Season Tickets for sale. The location is as followed: TD TDH R 17 TD TDH R 19 TD TDH R 21 The c...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1153 people have read this post