CU Guru [1125]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 1949
Joined: 7/14/13
|
Deon Cain is better than #7
[2]
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:09 PM
|
|
FACT. See you on sundays kid.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6050]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6234
Joined: 11/30/15
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:10 PM
|
|
He will be
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4995]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 8298
Joined: 10/8/08
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
[1]
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:10 PM
|
|
Agreed. He's gonna be a beast next year and then he's gone....
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1266]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 992
Joined: 9/23/09
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:13 PM
|
|
He's always been one of my favorite players. I don't know why and I caught a lot of slack from friends and family when he had some issues last year.
Just glad to see him doing well! Talent is there and him choosing Clemson and Dabo, I believe, will be one of his best decisions in his life. He needed a morally sound program to keep him on track and it will payoff huge dividends soon for him and for life!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [723]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 977
Joined: 8/8/09
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:10 PM
|
|
Let's slow down here... Mike is a much more complete receiver
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [723]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 977
Joined: 8/8/09
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
[1]
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:11 PM
|
|
That could change, but there's a reason he's projected to be the first receiver taken
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4995]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 8298
Joined: 10/8/08
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
[1]
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:13 PM
|
|
Cain is faster and doesn't drop as many passes, but Williams can go up and get it a little better.
Both will be good pros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [723]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 977
Joined: 8/8/09
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:13 PM
|
|
Agreed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3005]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5262
Joined: 8/30/11
|
lookin' good!***
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10400]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
[2]
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:11 PM
|
|
I'm glad we have both of them
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1713]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2492
Joined: 10/14/11
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:12 PM
|
|
Amen there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [75]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 152
Joined: 8/7/02
|
This^^***
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12135]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7089
Joined: 11/16/09
|
Good prob to have, but MW is much more consistent.***
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [41901]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 45007
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Always was this year.
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:17 PM
|
|
I just think Dabo wants to make sure he can count on him being responsible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3294
Joined: 1/4/14
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:18 PM
|
|
Mike is seeing a lot more double coverage. He is a bigger, more physical receiver, just had a few drops of late. Both will make 1st team somewhere in the NFL eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [239]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 543
Joined: 1/12/16
|
Re: Deon Cain is better than #7
Posted: Nov 5, 2016, 6:29 PM
|
|
Lulz.
We have a thread trashing Bryant for trying to make something happen and losing a few yards, and another claiming Cain, who lost a ton of yards off of a worse decision, is better than our best receiver. What's even the point of calling out Williams like that.
Tnet gonna tnet...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
