Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Read It And Weep. Literally. A Must Read. Depressing.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 6
| visibility 285

Read It And Weep. Literally. A Must Read. Depressing.


May 1, 2014, 5:29 PM

With the unveiling of the Affordable Care Act's website, the public experienced a painful reminder of the consequences of the government's new authority over health care. While millions signed up for insurance, millions of others abruptly lost their existing coverage and access to their doctors because that coverage didn't fit new ObamaCare definitions.

The health-care law was generated by an administration promoting government as the solution to inequality, yet the greatest irony of ObamaCare is what will undoubtedly follow as a long-term, unintended consequence of the law: a decidedly unequal, two-tiered health system. One will be for the poor and middle class, and a separate system will be for those with the money or power to circumvent ObamaCare.

With the Affordable Care Act, the government has dramatically expanded its authority as final arbiter over health insurance and consequently over access to medical care. After the law's Medicaid expansion and with the population aging into Medicare eligibility, the 107 million under Medicaid or Medicare in 2013 will skyrocket to 135 million five years later, growing far faster than the ranks of the privately insured.

Add to that centralization of power the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), ObamaCare's group of political appointees tasked with reducing payments to doctors and hospitals. Even Howard Dean, former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, warned that "The IPAB is essentially a health-care rationing body. By setting doctor reimbursement rates for Medicare and determining which procedures and drugs will be covered and at what price, the IPAB will be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them."

The hidden truth is just around the corner—those more dependent on public insurance, mostly the poor and middle class, will have limited access to medical care. About one-third of primary-care physicians and one-fourth of specialists have already completely closed their practices to Medicaid patients. Over 52% of physicians have already limited the access that Medicare patients have to their practices, or are planning to, according to a 2012 survey by Merritt Hawkins for the Physicians Foundation. More doctors than ever already refuse Medicaid and Medicare due to inadequate payments for care, and that trend will only accelerate as government lowers reimbursements.


http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304393704579528063516171576?mg=reno64-wsj&mod=rss_opinion_main&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304393704579528063516171576.html%3Fmod%3Drss_opinion_main

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg2013_nascar_champ.gif2014_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Shoulda gone with single payer.


May 1, 2014, 5:35 PM

Too bad this country would have fought it tooth and nail.

Meanwhile they're shouting "get your government hands off my Medicare!"

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Re: Shoulda gone with single payer.


May 1, 2014, 6:49 PM

that would have slowed GDP growth, cant have that. ;)

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Shoulda gone with single payer.


May 4, 2014, 1:10 PM [ in reply to Shoulda gone with single payer. ]

There needs to be a profit motive in medicine. British NHS is horrible, what makes you think the U.S. Can maintain innovation and quality with government run care?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Shoulda gone with single payer.


May 4, 2014, 1:49 PM

Sounds like you're talking about medical R&D. I was talking about seeing your doctor with single-payer insurance, such as people already do under that single-payer system called Medicare.

I'm all for protecting the profits of research labs by granting and enforcing patents with federal laws, regulations, and agencies.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Re: Read It And Weep. Literally. A Must Read. Depressing.


May 1, 2014, 5:36 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


how much did the brilliant people of Oregon spend on their


May 1, 2014, 5:55 PM

website?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If she's a hollerer, she'll be a screamer.
If she's a screamer, she'll get you arrested.


Replies: 6
| visibility 285
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic