Replies: 6
| visibility 285
|
All-In [25515]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14990
Joined: 10/12/08
|
Read It And Weep. Literally. A Must Read. Depressing.
May 1, 2014, 5:29 PM
|
|
With the unveiling of the Affordable Care Act's website, the public experienced a painful reminder of the consequences of the government's new authority over health care. While millions signed up for insurance, millions of others abruptly lost their existing coverage and access to their doctors because that coverage didn't fit new ObamaCare definitions.
The health-care law was generated by an administration promoting government as the solution to inequality, yet the greatest irony of ObamaCare is what will undoubtedly follow as a long-term, unintended consequence of the law: a decidedly unequal, two-tiered health system. One will be for the poor and middle class, and a separate system will be for those with the money or power to circumvent ObamaCare.
With the Affordable Care Act, the government has dramatically expanded its authority as final arbiter over health insurance and consequently over access to medical care. After the law's Medicaid expansion and with the population aging into Medicare eligibility, the 107 million under Medicaid or Medicare in 2013 will skyrocket to 135 million five years later, growing far faster than the ranks of the privately insured.
Add to that centralization of power the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), ObamaCare's group of political appointees tasked with reducing payments to doctors and hospitals. Even Howard Dean, former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, warned that "The IPAB is essentially a health-care rationing body. By setting doctor reimbursement rates for Medicare and determining which procedures and drugs will be covered and at what price, the IPAB will be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them."
The hidden truth is just around the corner—those more dependent on public insurance, mostly the poor and middle class, will have limited access to medical care. About one-third of primary-care physicians and one-fourth of specialists have already completely closed their practices to Medicaid patients. Over 52% of physicians have already limited the access that Medicare patients have to their practices, or are planning to, according to a 2012 survey by Merritt Hawkins for the Physicians Foundation. More doctors than ever already refuse Medicaid and Medicare due to inadequate payments for care, and that trend will only accelerate as government lowers reimbursements.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304393704579528063516171576?mg=reno64-wsj&mod=rss_opinion_main&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304393704579528063516171576.html%3Fmod%3Drss_opinion_main
|
|
|
|
All-In [34108]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33612
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Shoulda gone with single payer.
May 1, 2014, 5:35 PM
|
|
Too bad this country would have fought it tooth and nail.
Meanwhile they're shouting "get your government hands off my Medicare!"
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111617]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73767
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: Shoulda gone with single payer.
May 1, 2014, 6:49 PM
|
|
that would have slowed GDP growth, cant have that.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12269]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14009
Joined: 2/19/99
|
Re: Shoulda gone with single payer.
May 4, 2014, 1:10 PM
[ in reply to Shoulda gone with single payer. ] |
|
There needs to be a profit motive in medicine. British NHS is horrible, what makes you think the U.S. Can maintain innovation and quality with government run care?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34108]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33612
Joined: 9/7/20
|
Re: Shoulda gone with single payer.
May 4, 2014, 1:49 PM
|
|
Sounds like you're talking about medical R&D. I was talking about seeing your doctor with single-payer insurance, such as people already do under that single-payer system called Medicare.
I'm all for protecting the profits of research labs by granting and enforcing patents with federal laws, regulations, and agencies.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [56087]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31647
Joined: 8/27/02
|
Re: Read It And Weep. Literally. A Must Read. Depressing.
May 1, 2014, 5:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34593]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 41422
Joined: 4/20/01
|
how much did the brilliant people of Oregon spend on their
May 1, 2014, 5:55 PM
|
|
website?
|
|
|
|
Replies: 6
| visibility 285
|
|
|