Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
1st Rounder [612]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 922
Joined: 8/19/15
|
zac brooks or gallman
Oct 19, 2015, 9:39 AM
|
|
Who do you prefer? I like gallman, he has put in work and is a monster getting through the line. He runs with bad intentions.
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13360]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9886
Joined: 1/23/06
|
Yes!***
Oct 19, 2015, 9:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 3333
Joined: 9/29/11
|
Re: zac brooks or gallman
Oct 19, 2015, 9:41 AM
|
|
Gallman is much better, Zac does give you something out of the backfield.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3025
Joined: 8/19/08
|
Gallman is the starter. No debating that. He's put in his
Oct 19, 2015, 9:43 AM
|
|
work, worked his tail off and earned it. But, Zac Brooks does have his place on this team, and he is a nice change of pace when Gallman needs a spell. And when Brooks comes in, if he's got the hot hand, I've got no problem with them riding him for a series or two.
Brooks should have been the 2 all year long.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [612]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 922
Joined: 8/19/15
|
Re: Gallman is the starter. No debating that. He's put in his
Oct 19, 2015, 9:46 AM
|
|
I agree, zac can catch the ball. But it does seem that he gets stuck behind the o line alot. One could say he is always one arm tackle away from breaking a big one, or you could say he always one arm tackle. I like him as a back, but the power of gallman is awesome. I think Davidson showed good speed, and ran lower than all the other backs
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [612]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 922
Joined: 8/19/15
|
Re: Gallman is the starter. No debating that. He's put in his
Oct 19, 2015, 9:48 AM
|
|
I agree with all..an TD'S all around!!! Just purely for mon. Conversation. I wouldn't argue anyway
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
WAIT! You TDed me?
Oct 19, 2015, 10:32 AM
|
|
Don't you have to donate to be able to do that?
I has the confused.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1850]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2079
Joined: 7/29/03
|
both.....
Oct 19, 2015, 9:45 AM
|
|
At the saaaammmeee time
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1858]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 1666
Joined: 1/5/15
|
Re: zac brooks or gallman
Oct 19, 2015, 9:45 AM
|
|
I like both and feel there is plenty of room in our offense for both. I was impressed with Zac Saturday night and have been very excited about Gallman all year! Let's just accept our tremendous blessing with a stable overflowing with talent that gets even deeper next year with Feaster and just smile all the way to Arizona.
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [6]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11
Joined: 5/23/12
|
Re: zac brooks or gallman
Oct 19, 2015, 9:47 AM
|
|
Come on man! Lol BC's def line was beast. Gallman is still the "man" , dude runs so hard and violent, takes care of the ball. Now I do like brooks, excellent change of pace with some pretty nice pass catchingout of the backfield. Really though they're just keeping the seat warm for fastlane28 Mr Feaster! Keep it up Tigers, ya'll got my family and I excited for what lies ahead......
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [151]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 193
Joined: 10/8/07
|
Re: both deserving
Oct 19, 2015, 9:49 AM
|
|
I like alternating both for "fresh Legs". So nice to have 2-3 backs you can bring in anytime and get results. For a while there Saturday night (was at the game), I thought Gallman was hurt. Zac was in for several snaps. Love watching them both run, hopefully both stay healthy for FSU, we will need them.
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 222
Joined: 4/23/14
|
It is great Clemson has both...
Oct 19, 2015, 9:51 AM
|
|
and does not have to choose. I really can't choose between the two. Gallman is sooooooo physical at the point of attack, and runs like a monster where ever he goes on the line of scrimmage. I mean what secondary wants to hit Wayne when he has a full head of steam, one on one? Zac runs hard, but has "Wiggle" and at least looks like he is a little (and I mean small) faster than Wayne. Zac to me is a little bit more shifty and seems to get out of the backfield and run routes a little crisper (probably just perception). So I cannot decide, if I had to take one, I would probably go with Gallman, only because he has seen more playing time and is less of an unknown at this point, but Brooks is VERY close. And that is good for Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1967]
TigerPulse: 67%
Posts: 2267
Joined: 10/12/15
|
Re: zac brooks or gallman
Oct 19, 2015, 9:52 AM
|
|
They both complement each other well. Galman is the clear #1. Brooks is a great #2 guy that can change the pace. And be used catching the ball well. Love to see brooks run a few wheel routes.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4968]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 6030
Joined: 4/9/11
|
Gallman runs harder and blocks better than Brooks.***
Oct 19, 2015, 9:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
exactly***
Oct 19, 2015, 4:38 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: zac brooks or gallman
Oct 19, 2015, 9:57 AM
|
|
Both'em!
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93673]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95422
Joined: 12/25/09
|
Here's an equally tough question.
Oct 19, 2015, 9:57 AM
|
|
Mary Ann or Ginger?
I'm going with Mary Ann, then Ginger, Wayne, Zac in that order.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: Here's an equally tough question.
Oct 19, 2015, 10:33 AM
|
|
Both'em!
And like someone else said . . . at the same time.
Wait! Aren't they really old now?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26514]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20654
Joined: 9/2/02
|
If coaches kept with their "hot hand" approach ...
Oct 19, 2015, 10:29 AM
|
|
Gallman probably wouldn't have played the 2nd half.
Just wasn't his day.
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [300]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 154
Joined: 11/24/08
|
Both are great but...
Oct 19, 2015, 10:33 AM
|
|
Gallman is by far the better blocker. He attacks whoever he's blocking. Brooks seems to wait on the defender to come to him which results in him getting knocked into the QB. I think Brooks has better hands out of the backfield, but I love how Gallman hits the hole now. So much better than last year.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [32]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 126
Joined: 7/30/11
|
Re: zac brooks or gallman
Oct 19, 2015, 2:08 PM
|
|
For the first 3 to 5 yards I like Gallman, after that brooks.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12270]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12594
Joined: 12/1/03
|
both***
Oct 19, 2015, 2:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4059]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4547
Joined: 3/6/01
|
very different backs
Oct 19, 2015, 3:59 PM
|
|
as an "every down" back and between the tackles, i prefer gallman..wayne runs hard, and always north/south..but zac (imo) is a better outside and receiving threat.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Gallman obviously.**
Oct 19, 2015, 4:55 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3736
Joined: 1/15/13
|
Re: zac brooks or gallman
Oct 19, 2015, 5:00 PM
|
|
WAYNE TRAIN ALL DAY LONG!!
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
|
|