»
Topic: Why no 10 second run off in Auburn game?
Replies: 15   Last Post: Sep 24, 2016 10:14 PM by: TigerLinks
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 15  

Why no 10 second run off in Auburn game?

[1]
Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:40 PM
 

I thought if you committed an offensive penalty, you had to take TO or run 10 seconds off

2020 white level member

Re: Why no 10 second run off in Auburn game?


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:41 PM
 

Lsu didn't have any TO......


exactly, no TO = game ove, no play***


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:43 PM
 



2020 white level member

illegal shift is a pre-snap penalty


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:43 PM
 

all i can think of

2020 orange level member


Re: illegal shift is a pre-snap penalty

[1]
Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:47 PM
 

Same thing happened in the Stanford game just before half and the did the runoff.

I am now officially lost on this rule.

military_donation.jpg

well if that is the reason, kind of a dumb rule

[1]
Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:47 PM
 

The whole point was to prevent a team from being able to stop the clock with no TO. So now just commit an illegal shift and stop the clock. Doesn't make sense.

2020 white level member

Exactly!*********


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 10:14 PM
 




SO is false start


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:50 PM
 

And that carries the run off for sure

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


Re: SO is false start


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:52 PM
 

False start is a dead ball foul


True.


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:56 PM
 

I didn't see the end of the game, but if the illegal shift didn't cause the play to be called dead then there is no runoff after the end of the play.

In this case, I'd assume the play in which there was an illegal shift was completed normally, and as such there would be no run off.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


Re: illegal shift is a pre-snap penalty-- NOT!


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 10:09 PM
 

Just like illegal formation, it is a live ball foul.

2020 orange level member

Re: Why no 10 second run off in Auburn game?


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 9:47 PM
 

It's not a dead ball foul.

military_donation.jpg

Should've been game over.***


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 10:00 PM
 




It's the SEC!!!!!


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 10:03 PM
 

'Splains a lot....


It's the SEC!!!!!


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 10:04 PM
 

'Splains a lot....


Re: Why no 10 second run off in Auburn game?


Posted: Sep 24, 2016 10:07 PM
 

First, Illegal Shift is not a dead ball foul, so the clock correctly continued to run until the play was whistled dead.

Second, I believe there should have been a 10-second run-off, and the game should have ended. I'm not 100% sure on this, but reading the rule and the reason it was instituted in Wikipedia, it appears that the 10-second run-off would have been appropriate.

Third, the Referee clearly announced that the clock would start on his signal. Since the ball could not be snapped prior to the ready for play signal, it was virtually impossible for it to be snapped prior to time expiring.

Fourth, contratulations to Les Miles for, once again, mismanaging the game clock!

2020 orange level member

Replies: 15  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: I pay 3600 a year Pay half and can buy 4 tickets lower deck on about 30 yd line at the cost of seas...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
923 people have read this post