»
Topic: Clemson should have lost by 19
Replies: 105   Last Post: Jan 1, 2020 9:28 AM by: hierster
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 105  

Clemson should have lost by 19

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:20 PM
 

Clemson won by 6. Add the scoop n score +7, take away the target call, -7, the roughing the punter penalty -7, and add another 4 for the TD pass dropped by Dobbins that turned out to be a FG, and the final score should have been OSU 34, Clemson 15

Ohio State was clearly the better team.

LSU will destroy you.

Oh, and Welcome to New Orleans! Hope y'all have fun!


If my aunt had nuts she would be my uncle

[18]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:21 PM
 

and screwing your mother.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Grapes are sour with this one hmmm.***

[4]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 8:05 PM
 




Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[8]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:21 PM
 




Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[7]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:22 PM
 




Corn Dogs just POed they have to face us now instead of the

[7]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:25 PM
 

loser bucknuts.

They skeert.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Photobucket is holding my sig pic hostage. Screw them.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[4]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:27 PM
 

Oh and you forgot we missed a FG...


Dont forget about the potential “pick 6” Kavon Wallace dropped***

[1]
Posted: Dec 30, 2019 12:57 AM
 




Re: Dont forget about the potential “pick 6” Kavon Wallace dropped***

[1]
Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:06 AM
 

And the interception negated by a “hold”.


They could have won by 70....

[5]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:22 PM
 

If we just didn’t actually play the game....none of those things that happen in a game would have happened.

Just make up a number Jamonastick

Thanks for your kind inquiry

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg


You do realize how both stupid and ignorant you are, right?

[8]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:23 PM
 

Luv ya, buh-bye!


That's a whole lot of "what if's"

[5]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:23 PM
 

just to say your team doesn't like to play by the rules.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:23 PM
 

So just act like we didn’t see any of the miscues/points the Tigers left off the board


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:23 PM
 

So just act like we didn’t see any of the miscues/points the Tigers left off the board


But, we didn't ... so ...***

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:23 PM
 



2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


And Wisconsin should have beat you by 30.

[4]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:23 PM
 

There's losers, sore losers, and then there's B1G and SEC losers.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:23 PM
 

“Ohio State was clearly the better team”

Bahahaha!!

Better teams find a way to win. OSU got beat by the better team.

Now watch as Clemson takes home another Natty.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[5]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:24 PM
 

Spoken like a true loser


The BETTER team won the game !

[4]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:25 PM
 

It happens that way


You forgot to add in the points for all of the

[3]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:25 PM
 

Field goals that should have been TDs against another defense.

That’s 46 total right?

But while we are at it, let’s give Potter the missed FG early....


Re: You forgot to add in the points for all of the


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:28 PM
 

I actually gave y'all a break on the first drive of the game, Ohio State had a one on one at the wide side of the field but Fields chose to throw it to the short side. That play should have been a TD for sure, so another +4... but I'm feeling generous today so - nah.


Re: You forgot to add in the points for all of the


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:09 PM
 

And if you weren’t fat drunk and stupid, you would have a boyfriend...


Butthurt loser is butthurt!

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:35 PM
 

By this impeccable logic, Alabama "should've" beat us in last year's title game. Well what do you know, the Clemson Tigers happen to play great redzone defense! We may give up yardage but we make stops when we have to have them. While I might concede that the scoop-&-score was a borderline call, does one really contend that OSU didn't rough our punter? That was a mental mistake by OSU special teams, not a gift from the officials. The targeting call was the right one - video evidence is clear. That was no doubt a game-changer, but credit our offense for taking advantage of the opportunity. The reversal of the TD catch was inarguably the right call too.

If OSU had executed better in the redzone, there wouldn't even be any "controversy" over the officiating. So for the butthurt Bucknuts it's wait till next year. At least y'all have a basketball team worth cheering for.


Re: You forgot to add in the points for all of the


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 12:59 AM
 

Can't help that your QB is incompetent when it comes to reading defenses. He knows where he is throwing it before the ball is snapped. Just like another qb we all know.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: You forgot to add in the points for all of the


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 6:20 AM
 

Thanks for the break. As if we need it...


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:26 PM
 



2020 purple level member

Jabontik: Was your son wearing the ankle monitor in game?

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:26 PM
 

..thought so....


So basically what you're saying is

[6]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:26 PM
 

if OSU was better they wouldn't have been stuffed in the red zone, dropped easy TD catches, gotten called for a clear targeting, run into the punter like idiots, etc?

But clearly they were the better team...lololol

GTFO here!

military_donation.jpg


HaHaHaHa.....good one.

[5]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:27 PM
 

Let me simplify....

OSU = Lost
Clemson = Won

See how easy reality is?

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[6]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:27 PM
 

96 yards with the game on the line in 4 plays. In 1 min 18 secs. The better team won.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:31 PM
 

On that last drive if Travis were smart he would have gone down at the 2 instead of scoring a TD with 110 seconds left.

That was a losers drive.

Ohio State actually then proceeded to take the ball, drive calmly right down the field and was gonna win the game right there if not for a miscommunication and a slip.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[6]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:35 PM
 

Doggone those miscommunication and slips.

That is why we work hard on communication and not slipping!


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:40 PM
 

It’s stupid stuff like that that keeps the better team from winning.
Man, I hate it when that happens.

The two sure INTs we dropped (one was gonna be a pick six), well, those were just due to Ohio greatness because they got no breaks and everything went Clemson’s way.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Photobucket is holding my sig pic hostage. Screw them.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:38 PM
 

Man, that sucks doesn't it? Oh well. Maybe your QB and WR should get better at communication. The better team won.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:41 PM
 

Jelistick is a Corn Dog, not a bucknut.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Photobucket is holding my sig pic hostage. Screw them.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:39 PM
 

F**k off to your own delusional board you whiny a$$ pu$$y. Think I create a Warrior11 account to troll your people who gives as much a sh1t about I say as we do you. Prime ######### here folks.typical of F**knut fans...


Again you are playing "what ifs"


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:40 PM
 

"Was going to win except for a miscommunication and a slip"/ You realize that these are parts of the game that you have to execute to have a successful pass play, right? OSU didn't do it and lost because of it.

If Clemson doesn't allow an onside kick, and a kick return in 2015 we have three of the last four and going for four of last five, but we didn't execute and therefore we lost. Like OSU last night.

Now ####

military_donation.jpg


You joined today just to make idiot statements like this?

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:41 PM
 

Seriously?

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

“Was”


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:45 PM
 

Lots of was’s, if’s, shoulda woulda coulda’s there buddy...

Fact is Ohio came out strong, outplayed Clemson for much of the game but put too much focus on aggression and intensity and made too many stupid mistakes because of it. Football is a multi-dimensional game and they didn’t take care of business in all dimensions.

LSU has an inferior defense to Ohio State, and their offense is good but I have seen quite a few miracle throws and plays that with a defense the caliber of Clemson will not be as easy to achieve. Was more concerned with Ohio State than LSU and I think if you ask the majority of Clemson fans you will get the same response. My only worry is we got banged up playing a much more physical team than we will see on the 13th....

Prepare to be crowned 2nd best Tigers in the country!


IF


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:50 PM
 

You lost


Buckeye’s favorite words: “if” “but”***


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:59 PM
 



2020 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

There's something in these hills.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 1:01 AM
 

Thats the difference you dumb ###. Our guys don't make those stupid mistakes. You also forgot to mention the pick six that Wallace just dropped as well. Get over it your team lost to a better team.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 1:01 AM
 

Actually that turned out to be the winners drive.LMMFAO!

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 1:58 AM
 

Travis couldn’t go down with 110 seconds left because TE had the ball. Did you watch the game jabroni? Also, you take the points when they’re there to take in a one score game. Stuff happens when you get too cute.


You Mad!

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:29 PM
 

Jabontik said:

Clemson won by 6. Add the scoop n score +7, take away the target call, -7, the roughing the punter penalty -7, and add another 4 for the TD pass dropped by Dobbins that turned out to be a FG, and the final score should have been OSU 34, Clemson 15

Ohio State was clearly the better team.

LSU will destroy you.

Oh, and Welcome to New Orleans! Hope y'all have fun!




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdyjxupbcdE


Hahaha yea we

[3]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:29 PM
 

Didn’t play very well in the 1st quarter. We didn’t lose though did we?

You sound scared. You scared?

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

nobody to blame but yourselves

[3]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:29 PM
 

Score TD’s rather then FG’s and you won the game by the half. But you didn’t so...

2020 white level member

Are You Naturally Stupid or is This Inbreeding

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:31 PM
 

Go back to effin your Kin sh*theel

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[5]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:31 PM
 

Funny how you forget that Clemson had an interception that was reversed. Give me a break with the refs crap. We played about as bad as we could and yet we still won. Dabo and his men will be ready. Don’t you worry about that


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:33 PM
 

I think the truth hurts, and I think I've struck a nerve.

You guys know you should have lost that #### game and you're scared as #### of LSU.


What I know is Ohio State has a bunch of prick fans

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:39 PM
 

And apparently LSU does too. At least Bama acted like they had been there before.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[4]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:40 PM
 

The only thing I'm scared of is you procreating.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:43 PM
 

Oh yes we are shaking in our boots ??


Sure there’s probably a few that are scared but really why

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:47 PM
 

Should be scared of the big bad SEC?

Every team we play in the CFP has an unstoppable player, and are one of the best teams in history. We are used to it and so are our players.

Nobody is scared of a team with a weak defense. I can assure you that.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

I want to get this straight . .


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 11:44 PM
 

Where have you and LSU been the last 5 years? You know where we've been for the last 4 years and now a 5th. But after one good season, you are talking trash like this? LOL


Yea that’s why we’re on other team’s boards


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 11:48 PM
 

Projecting our insecurities on opposing fans

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 1:03 AM
 

Yep we just don't want to play any good teams. You got us!

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

So what excuses will you guys come up with

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:32 PM
 

if those are already taken? I look forward to planting your arrogant QB in the ground. He’s finally about to play a real defense...one better than Auburn’s, and TL and the O are about to run through you like you weren’t even there. If OSU’s defense can’t stop them, LSU’s definitely can’t.


You ain't sittin for a week

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:33 PM
 

with that much butthurt!!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car."

"I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it."


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:33 PM
 

Incidentally how did your coots do?

If we scored every time we got the ball we would have won by at least two scores because we got two turnovers. You have already accounted for every Bucknut score. Correct moron?


Hope all them sour grapes give you a massive case of

[5]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:33 PM
 

indigestion, you schmuck. We knew beforehand that no matter what, you and your ilk would never accept defeat gracefully. So, enjoy your bellyaching, it won't change the outcome, or our joy over your sorrow. :)

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

But we didn't

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:34 PM
 

Welcome to the board "little Brother"


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:35 PM
 

Didn’t we drop like 3 interceptions in the first 2 quarterS? We should of won by 21 more?

2020 white level member

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:37 PM
 

Stop smoking meth.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:43 PM
 

Listen here Jabroni, get back behind the counter and fix me a bowl gumbo with extra tigah meat.

2020 purple level member


A win, is a win, is a win even when Ryan Day whines about it

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:44 PM
 

This is why armchair QBs get a bad name...

Maybe, Could'a, Should'a, Would'a


Well this sounds like a fun game

[10]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:45 PM
 

Ok, here's my move -

Clemson should have won by 33.

Works this way -

Potter straightens his FG attempt and it's good. That's 3

We don't let the two pick six passes that Fields threw hit the ground. That's 14

Wallace takes the right angle and tackles Dobbins for no gain on his first TD. That's -7

We block one of OSU's FG attempts. That's -3 (Why not? My what if's make as much sense as your drivel)

Final score, Clemson 46 - OSU 13

Ok, your turn.

Why don't you do a what if where the entire Clemson defense leaves at the half to eat fried rattlesnake at Rustler's Roost and OSU gets to play the 2nd half with no Clemson D to oppose them?

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Hmm you are good at this game

[2]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:54 PM
 

I’m going with that score

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Then what happened :)***

[1]
Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:02 AM
 



2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

go find a statue of Woody Hayes

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:46 PM
 

Tell him all about how you should have beaten Clemson and maybe hit it up side the head a few times.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:46 PM
 

But, last I looked anyway....incomplete passes, targeting calls, roughing the punter, and dropped TD passes are all legitimate parts of the game....areas where the nuts failed. You came away with ZERO Red-Zone TDs...this had EVERYTHING to do with your opposition.

You got outscored 29-7 after the middle of the second quarter. Champions find a way to win these games...something your team failed to do.

Just own it.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:48 PM
 

You let little ole Clemson out contribute to the refs slush fund. If you played a clean game you could have blown us out. If “ifs” and buts were candy and nuts we’d all have a merry Christmas. Sucks doesn’t it? May your stewing keep you warm during the cold winter.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:49 PM
 

Well... I see Coach Day just had to log on and post on Tigernet. #Butthurtnutz


If I just had 6 more numbers right...

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:49 PM
 

I would’ve won the Powerball.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:50 PM
 

Don’t know if you are a coot or “the” OSU but Either way call us DADDY and go away loser!!! LSWho is next!!!


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 7:52 PM
 

So y’all still ain’t too good at math over there ehhh? It’s ok baby tiger. You stick to the gumbo. We got the TDs. See ya 1-13!


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 8:00 PM
 

But here is the deal. The scoop was an incomplete pass The targeting did happen and Dobb’s dropped the #### ball. Is football and that’s why you play the game. Winners don’t have to make excuses. Sorry losers are always full of excuses. The right team won. Live with it an shut up.


Shoulda Coulda Woulda


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 8:03 PM
 

Na

military_donation.jpg

Well dude...that pass was dropped, the punter was roughed,


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 8:09 PM
 

and that was definitely a proper call on the targeting. So, the bucknuts definitely made those mistakes, just a we had mistakes we made! So what is your complaint? Both teams could have played better, but in the end, our Tigers had what it takes to come out on top...your bucknuts did not!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Shoulda, could, woulda...Hey Bucknut, Happy 4-0 Day


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 8:10 PM
 

Welcome to the reality of the present. Hope you all choke on your excuses and wishful dreams of "getting even" with Clemson...at least you'll be mimicking the choking your team did on the real field.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 8:10 PM
 

This reads just like a couple of posts from Buckeye fans who came to this board and proclaimed that Clemaon was about to be taken to the woodshed and humiliated.

I swear this isn't new material, it's regurgitated nonsense from idiots who haven't even watched Clemson play this season, or any other season for that matter.


Wrong on all counts.


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 8:17 PM
 

There was no scoop and score because possession was never obtained. Close, but good call by replay booth. Strike 1.

Leading with the crown of the helmet is called targeting. Obviously a good call. Strike 2.

Your player dropped the ball. Not even sure he would have scored, but you cant blame the refs on that. Strike 3.

Its against the rules to hit a defenseless kicker. Thought everyone knew that. Obviously another legitimate call by the refs. Strike 4.

Maybe if you would have scored more points than us you could call yourself the better team? Maybe if you could have stopped us with the game on the line you could call yourself the better team? But alas, you did neither. The better team won.

Looks like you struck the heck out chief, even with an extra strike. Is your IQ typical of most Suckeye fans? Them grapes are super sour, huh?


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:10 PM
 

https://youtu.be/bj63nhV3VuU


This is what we think about that Jabroni

2020 purple level member


You’ll post another one like this after we beat LSU


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:13 PM
 

Do get better at it.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:15 PM
 

Just like you LSU fans will be on the back of a milk carton in three weeks. Ha ha ha ha ha haaah.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

pretty sure people like you said Ohio State was going to destroy Clemson

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:16 PM
 

I love laughing at you clowns


You sound skeered.


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:25 PM
 

You skeered? Would suck to field maybe your best team of all time, play at home essentially for the natty, and blow it to an 'obviously' inferior team that 'should have' lost to OH4O State. Hah.

Venables and the Tiger D will have Burreaux's brain splitting open. Clemson faced its toughest test last night, won it, and will wipe the floor with an overhyped LSU on the 13th. The sooner you come to understand that reality the better your life will be later on.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:28 PM
 



2020 white level member

Brad Brownell: all-time winningest coach in Clemson men's basketball history, and only coach to beat North Carolina in Chapel Hill.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:33 PM
 

You must be one of those O-H-I-O loser fans & may be kin to Urban Myer! Go get a life! And get off TigerNet!


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:40 PM
 

Get your excuses ready. Just so you can come up with some new material, we have already heard: The ACC is bad. The SEC is too hard. You used targeting is a bad rule, though I bet you weren't complaining when the Oklahoma guy got tossed. We complain too much about not getting respect.

Nothing is too outrageous and we need something for discussion to bridge the gap between the Championship game and the next ring presentation during the Orange and White game. I would say to not procrastinate but your delusional but is going to. Maybe watch you some Finebaum. I'm sure that he will be able to give you some ideas.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:41 PM
 

Stop entertaining this Yahoo. Here's just stirring the pot and isn't worth our time. LSU just played an 8th grade defense and is happy about the win. Let her talk now while she has the chance.


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 10:43 PM
 

We know you are disappointed to have to play the real Tigers but hey your 40 year old qb won't sit in the pocket eating sandwiches against us.We will make your qb look like Todd Ellis.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 29, 2019 11:37 PM
 

lmao

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Considering how bad Clemson played in the first half . . .

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 11:39 PM
 

and yet they still won . . . I'd say OSU was lucky we weren't hitting on all cylinders in the first half. Maybe Ohio State should have lost by 19.

How 'bout them apples beeyotch!?


Lol

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 11:40 PM
 



2020 white level member

Clemson


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 29, 2019 11:48 PM
 

Your mother SHOULD have better understood how birth control works.


south carolina fans are weird***


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:05 AM
 




Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:09 AM
 

I predict 5 sacks by the Clemson defense on Joe Burrow, Mr.Heisman trophy winner. He won’t be able to concentrate because he’ll be looking for #11 every play. Go home all you LSU crayfish eating fans. By the way eating the heads off a crayfish is unsanitary.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

0 for 3 in the redzone leads to 0-4 record!


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:09 AM
 

80% Red Zone Efficiency in the BIG10 to 0fer against lowly Clemson!

LMAOHIO!


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:14 AM
 

I think if I use your logic we may never get beat again. The scoop and score could have just as easily been called a catch and forward progress so it was blown dead. If Tee does not get hurt in the 1st quarter he may have scored 3 td's so take your hurt butt and go into the corner and suck on your thumb you are just not man enough to watch football.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:16 AM
 

Should have, could have, would have. Bye, bye


Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:20 AM
 

Jabontik said:

Clemson won by 6. Add the scoop n score +7, take away the target call, -7, the roughing the punter penalty -7, and add another 4 for the TD pass dropped by Dobbins that turned out to be a FG, and the final score should have been OSU 34, Clemson 15

Ohio State was clearly the better team.

LSU will destroy you.

Oh, and Welcome to New Orleans! Hope y'all have fun!



If we’re counting hypotheticals make sure we count them all. Fields should’ve been picked off four times in that game. GTFO


Mmmm...Extra Salty


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:20 AM
 
lays.jpg(106.9 K)




Re: Clemson should have lost by 19

[1]
Posted: Dec 30, 2019 11:44 AM
 

So , logically...
If she weighs the same as a duck...
She’s made of wood
And, therefore...
A witch!


does your analysis make you feel better?***


Posted: Dec 30, 2019 12:40 PM
 



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Clemson should have lost by 19


Posted: Jan 1, 2020 9:28 AM
 

You might be right...if's and butts...SEC refs call pass interference then we win by 21 instead of 6...If you poison nutters had Woody Hayes there doing the punching you might have lost by another touchdown or two! After the 310 to Yuma you idiots should have learned!


Replies: 105  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 6 LOWER LEVEL North Season Tickets. Sec S, row K. Near the start of Sec R. $985ea. Located in Greenv...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
8884 people have read this post