One of the many many reasons Donny is unfit to lead anyone

Our own military unit responsible for BDA is saying the bombing was not 100% successful yet he's STILL running off at the mouth about "total obliteration". No one is perfect and no operation goes EXACTLY as planned. A real leader with emotional maturity doesn't shy away from honest and true performance reporting. If all of your objectives were not met you have to acknowledge that before you can pivot and come up with a new plan to achieve your goal. All donny cares about is looking like a big tough guy at press conferences; he's too much of a baby to admit something needs to be done differently or followed up on. That is not leadership.

Before you MAGA idiots chime in no I'm NOT happy that all our objectives in this mission were not met. The world is a safer place if Iran never attains nuclear capabilities. We all have the same goal; I just wish we had more competent leadership in service of that goal.

deleted

Varsity [106]

TigerPulse: 92%

Posts: 35

Joined: 1998

You don't know what you are talking about

Jun 25, 2025, 12:54 PM

Go get yourself some learnin' if you want to post.

Everything is characterized in terms of probabilities. Prior to the mission, probabilities of many elements are calculated/estimated such as the probability of
-Aircraft arrival
-Weapon delivery on the aimpoint
-Weapon orientation and velocity at the aimpoint
-Weapon detonation

Then the target characterization has probabilities, since we were not able to sink a cone penetrometer into the soil/rock. So geological layer thickness and materials are estimated with ranges as are the structural details of the facility itself. The structure layout in addition to concrete thicknesses and strength will be modeled/simulated with ranges.

So there is no "answer" to the analysis. The answers are based in the context of probabilities. There's a X% probability of [insert adjective] structural damage. Or they might say, if the Facility looks exactly like this, there's a X% probability of [insert adjective] structural damage. In this case, the X will likely be a much better (higher) figure since some of the uncertainties were removed.

So there are literally an unlimited number of answers based on the assumptions put into the prediction.

The big brains will update the simulations based on 'ground truth' knowledge, such as the actual aimpoints and whether or not they all detonated, which we know because planes were there. All these delivery uncertainties can be removed and the analysis gets 'better.'

All of this is 'open source' info. You can dig and find it if you want. But I have worked around this chit for a long time.

Message was edited by: NC_Tiger_®

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

One of the many many reasons Donny is unfit to lead anyone

Sure, but NC_Tiger has studied these weapons and rock compositions

He is the master of internet research .***

read it and weep dumba$$es

He's too busy crying about getting thumbs down to focus on his research

Which "unit" was that?***

The defense intelligence agency

Do you have a link of their report?***

No it was reported by the AP yesterday

So, that's a "no".***

So, therefore, what?***

It's a big "no"...these commies are idiots***

The AP, BBC, CNN, Foxnews, and even Trump himself have confirmed the report

Quit being a parody***

Every good authoritarian needs one. Ours just happens to also be hawt.

Too chunky***

Short of a ground invasion, this is all a guess.

You are only able to guess

You don't know what you are talking about

Of course I don't no one does but you

No it is more like you read

Giving you TDs is fun now that I know that it makes your vaj hurt***

Oh question tres

I know people at DIA

I know people at NASCAR

LOL!

CNN says

The defense intelligence agency said all of those things

See above, and you can bet if the Air Force

Cool got it

Ooh he gave me a TD

Just because I got it and you don't

Always explaining how smart you are is definitely a habit of intelligent people***

yeah, ### am I supposed to say

No, Im an actual doctor***

Psh, you don't have a Tigernet declared PhD?! MDs are dumb, look at Covid.***

Whered he go?***

She ran away for good.***

well.

Fine just answer one last question honestly

Probably not

Seems like definitely not

I get it

I'll just be more clear on this

So WTH have you been arguing about??***

Yeah, I certainly don't know. But Trump has no credibility here, and it's not

Citing a bunch of probability models kinda reinforces that Trump is full of ####

Your post didn't say anything, nor refute the OP.

Re: One of the many many reasons Donny is unfit to lead anyone

TigerBoard POTD