Ultimate Clemson Legend [108993]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 70754
Joined: 2002
|
Here's a good one, from the UK.
Sep 10, 2024, 9:54 AM
|
|
Lockdowns aged children's brains.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/sep/09/covid-lockdowns-prematurely-aged-girls-brains-more-than-boys-study-finds
I mean obviously it was the lockdowns. Scientists from University of Texas, Harvard Medical School, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, University of Oxford, Imperial College London, Kings College in London, University of Campinas, George Washington University, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Fleni, Buenos Aires, National Institutes of Health, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Rush Medical College, Paris Brain Institute, Yale School of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, and a few dozen other places seem to think there may, possibly, be some other possible cause. They have done scans, taken samples, and done autopsies, ALL AGES, showing brain impacts. And we're supposed to think lockdowns are the cause of the problems? Did the article mention this same problem exists in adults? In many countries, with different lockdown levels? The UK Biobank study was perhaps the most telling. In the UK they save MRI's, for a reason. When covid hit, they could take people who had previous MRI's before covid, and compare post-covid MRI's to the prior ones of the same people, and document the changes. In fact, the same source was used in this study. In this study they took the MRI's from children and compared them.
Guess what? Previous studies used the SAME SOURCE to take studies of adults before and after covid...I mean lockdowns, and found the same thing.
**************************************************
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.05.24303816v1
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00321-w
https://clinicalepigeneticsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-024-01724-9
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-02001-z
This was way back in 2020, before Reuters got the memo.
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL8N2HI38G/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1934590923004423
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04569-5
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.22.24310790v2
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00263-8/fulltext#appsec1
https://rupress.org/jem/article/218/3/e20202135/211674/Neuroinvasion-of-SARS-CoV-2-in-human-and-mouse
https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001151
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05542-y
https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000202252
https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR486308
https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-023-03049-1
************************************************
And lest we forget, none of this is as surprising as we are told.
In 2009 they revisited SARS survivors who were infected in 2003, 30% of whom were healthcare workers.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834309000474
Key note (brackets are mine): "Throughout the SARS convalescence period, the rate of unemployment increased markedly from 3.3% to 14.4%, and the rate of retirement from 0 to 4.4% [Average age of study participants was 41yo]. Among HCWs, 22% were still on intermittent or continuous sick leave at the time of this study [2009- 6 years after infection], and 7.4% had applied for early retirement."
More studies of 2003 SARS survivors:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17500304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7135192/
Again, no surprises here. Long SARS came 16 years before "long covid". Back then there were limited subjects to test and unlimited possible reasons. Today there are limited subjects who have NOT had it, and the list of reasons is very small, and getting smaller by the day. Vaccines, lockdowns, as time goes by, the list of reasons will dwindle. Kudos to the Guardian for keeping up the good fight. 20 years from now, those lockdowns will still be blamed, and the vaccines I guess in the countries lucky enough to have that excuse.
|
|
50
