Replies: 11
| visibility 158
|
Hall of Famer [8927]
TigerPulse: 92%
43
Posts: 10084
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [773]
TigerPulse: 68%
22
|
Texas A&M
1
Jun 8, 2023, 3:21 PM
|
|
Ahead of Clemson is laughable. They haven’t “claimed” a national championship since the 30s. Florida State is also a little too high. I think Clemson and FSU are about on equal footing.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [10902]
TigerPulse: 60%
45
Posts: 13963
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Texas A&M
1
Jun 8, 2023, 3:26 PM
|
|
Clawing, you might want to read the list and article again. Of the schools ahead of us, only Nebraska has not been in the top tier lately. All time in this case means 70 years so to ranked #20 is a huge honor.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7746]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: All time rankings
Jun 8, 2023, 3:38 PM
|
|
We should move up one, or two, spots once the 2023 rankings come out.
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [78978]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 44081
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [78978]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 44081
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Not pre-season, but actual season:
Jun 8, 2023, 3:51 PM
|
|
Clemson #14 chickens #55 A&M #16
|
|
|
|
 |
Campus Hero [13635]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
Re: Not pre-season, but actual season:
Jun 8, 2023, 3:55 PM
[ in reply to Not pre-season, but actual season: ] |
|
I was just going to post that.
The OP’s list is simply a list of how wrong and biased the media is in their predictions.
Apparently they are quite proud of how wrong and biased they are, so they made a list to display their incompetence and bias for everyone to see.
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12407]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 14764
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Not pre-season, but actual season:
Jun 8, 2023, 4:55 PM
[ in reply to Not pre-season, but actual season: ] |
|
And Winsipedia only gives all-time wins. Therefore, FSU is only ranked 80th best. I do think they should be ranked much higher when we consider winning %, ACC Titles, national champinships, blue chippers, coach Bowden, etc.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [6043]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Not worth the paper it's written on....
Jun 8, 2023, 4:06 PM
|
|
"All Time Rankings" are nebulous.
Ranking based on AP polls....LOL. AP idiots were erased from relevancy by the CFP because they were so historically biased. Not exactly a ringing endorsement of AP rankings. A lot of subjective garbage not worth paying attention to IMOP.
|
|
|
|
 |
Trainer [30]
TigerPulse: 98%
4
|
Re: All time rankings
Jun 8, 2023, 4:20 PM
|
|
Thanks for the post. If you scroll down in the link to the bottom you can click on the same rankings for different decades. Decade beginning 2020 we are tied for second with oHo, decade beginning 2000 we are no 4. In more recent and relevant years, we are up there!
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12407]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 14764
Joined: 2014
|
Re: All time rankings
Jun 8, 2023, 4:52 PM
|
|
This is how the "experts" saw things BEFORE the seasons began, which only demonstrates how wrong they could be. How about the final polls?
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9977]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11216
Joined: 2003
|
All time pre season! I want to see all time final rankings. Think Clemson is more like 15.***
Jun 8, 2023, 5:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 158
|
|
|