|
Replies: 20
| visibility 1151
|
Legend [6705]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
How is that not targeting? That is exactly
7
7
Oct 28, 2023, 3:06 PM
|
|
what they are trying to get out of the game. Leading with the helmet.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4843]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:06 PM
|
|
Yeah, for real. Even announcers said that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5825]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
Can’t believe they didn’t review that. Text book targeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5825]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3272]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:06 PM
|
|
Should have been reviewed at least
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31543]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 36945
Joined: 2000
|
If you want to know the answer
1
Oct 28, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
It's because his head was still "eyes up" and he hit with the forehead part and not the crown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3677]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Its forcible contact to the head or neck area.
Oct 28, 2023, 3:08 PM
|
|
Doesn’t have to be the defenders crown of the helmet. It was targeting,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14588]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23654
Joined: 2004
|
I'm not able to watch
Oct 28, 2023, 3:11 PM
|
|
but the rules are different if it's a ball carrier. They are never considered defenseless. Criteria for targeting on a ball carrier is stricter than on a defenseless player. I believe there has to be forcible contact to the head or neck area with the crown of the helmet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31543]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 36945
Joined: 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1659]
TigerPulse: 91%
31
|
Ill have to see it again, but the two replays they showed
Oct 28, 2023, 3:09 PM
[ in reply to If you want to know the answer ] |
|
Looked like his head was down with crown leading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [222]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [222]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6705]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: If you want to know the answer
1
Oct 28, 2023, 3:10 PM
[ in reply to If you want to know the answer ] |
|
I’ve seen a lot less hits than that called targeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1085]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
I see it 10 or 20 times a game. It's such an arbitrary call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [366]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Textbook targeting***
1
Oct 28, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15604]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 16016
Joined: 2010
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:08 PM
|
|
Wake up Dabo. You should have jumped the refs. Had plenty of time to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4121]
TigerPulse: 80%
36
|
One of the many reasons I hate the targeting rule
Oct 28, 2023, 11:54 AM
|
|
It's called on some but not on others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1973]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Yes. Supposedly the rule was put in to prevent injuries, except that they
Oct 28, 2023, 3:10 PM
|
|
don't call it when it actually does cause an injury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [299]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:11 PM
|
|
Definitely a target. Hit him in the back of helmet with his helmet. But then again, a linemen can pull the shirt of a dline while tackling the ball carrier and not a sniff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [317]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:16 PM
|
|
Yep, defenseless player falling backwards, crown of helmet to back of Ships helmet after a launch. No question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [595]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 20
| visibility 1151
|
|
|
50
