|
Replies: 13
| visibility 2100
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102501]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 26395
Joined: 2006
|
Did anyone else think that the broadcasters
Oct 19, 2019, 3:45 PM
|
|
of our game were overly anti-Clemson? I understand criticizing bad plays, no matter who it is. It just seemed like all they did was criticize the whole time.
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [916]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Yes but someone must have blown in
Oct 19, 2019, 3:49 PM
|
|
their ear to back off, because the color guy changed too much towards the end
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31635]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 36997
Joined: 2000
|
It was weird.
Oct 19, 2019, 3:49 PM
|
|
Most of it I understood, as they were talking about the errors we were making.
But at the end as we're steamrolling Louisiville, One guy says "I'm here to defend Clemson to anyone, they belong", and the other guy said (non-jokingly and dismissively) "They're pretty good."
I'll take the "5 touchdown road win to extend the nation's longest active winning streak" type of pretty good every day
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5074]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: It was weird.
Oct 19, 2019, 3:51 PM
|
|
The one guy who made the comment about defending Clemson also said pretty much the same before the game started. I can't remember his exact words, but he was basically saying he didn't understand people writing Clemson off based on playing one game close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18408]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10717
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Did anyone else think that the broadcasters
Oct 19, 2019, 3:52 PM
|
|
They sung the narrative that we’ll hear all week. Won’t be shocked if we drop. Meanwhile, Florida game gets called a “great “ win. Coots went for it on 4th at their 10 or the score would have been 31-27. That’s a great win. I hate cbs esecpn and all these pundits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5074]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Did anyone else think that the broadcasters
Oct 19, 2019, 4:25 PM
|
|
Or the score would've been 38-20 if South Carolina doesn't get a garbage time touchdown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [65783]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 49315
Joined: 2000
|
At the end, high-pitched dude came to our defense. Said
Oct 19, 2019, 3:58 PM
|
|
the Clemson critics were wrong and challeneged the others to fight about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102501]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 26395
Joined: 2006
|
I stepped out for a few minutes and didn’t see that
Oct 19, 2019, 4:16 PM
|
|
part. That’s great to hear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3300]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
same thing last week.***
Oct 19, 2019, 4:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19181]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11928
Joined: 2001
|
Seemed very interested in LVille making it a game. Not sure
Oct 19, 2019, 4:14 PM
|
|
if it was anti-Clemson or just wanting a good game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4605]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Did anyone else think that the broadcasters
Oct 19, 2019, 4:17 PM
|
|
Still less smug than that little putz Levy. But yeah, the older guy was vehemently anti-Clemson. Orlavsky, the younger guy, was not so bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1296]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: Did anyone else think that the broadcasters
Oct 19, 2019, 4:20 PM
|
|
The color guy went through 3 1/2 quarters not saying anything positive about anything on either side. That guy just is an "I know better than anyone" kind of person. The kicker was when he said we should have handed off instead of passin on a play we gained over 20 yards through the air. Everyone here would crack up in the 4th quarter when he was all complementary when the game was effectively over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3475]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
They sucked ### and perpetuated the media bias
Oct 19, 2019, 4:20 PM
|
|
over Clemson and the ACC. They sucked.
Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3807]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: Did anyone else think that the broadcasters
Oct 19, 2019, 4:39 PM
|
|
Yeah, I think they must have gotten in Booth's ear too and got him fighting mad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 2100
|
|
|
50
