Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 49
| visibility 1

Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?


Sep 2, 2012, 9:29 AM

If we were going by how well the team played, I could see us moving into the top ten and have USUC falling out to the top 15, but I don't think they put that much thought into it.

I figure we'll move up a spot or two, but the big 10 lovefest will leave Mich in front of us.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?


Sep 2, 2012, 9:38 AM

I think we will be 11 or 12. They will probably have michigan in front of us. But i dont really care until the end.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?


Sep 2, 2012, 9:49 AM

I HOPE that we don't move in the poles. Even IF we get to 8/0, I hope we don't move in the poles until we get to 10/0 if we can. No worse team to play against than one that feels they are being disrespected. Leave us right where we are so our Clemson don't get complacent and drop the ball. Clemson mostly does better when they feel they don't get any respect. I hope that the writers and other fans disrespect the h&ll out of us. Our guys will practice harder, and hit in the games with very bad intentions. GOOOOOO TIGERSSSS, the others are disrespecting us/y'all. They the others are saying that you players had a horse shoe up your A$$ES last night. And that AuBum has a much better team than ours. Yeah that's what they are saying about our/you Tigers. They are also saying that we should be spelling Tigers with a small t. :)

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?


Sep 2, 2012, 9:52 AM

Vandy is every bit as good as Auburn. How do you figure they should drop?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wait what


Sep 2, 2012, 9:55 AM

I guess you missed the game delivering pizzas thursday night.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wait what


Sep 2, 2012, 9:57 AM

Another original response..

Vandy is a better team than last year when they barely lost to UGA and Ark. As the season goes on you will see that Vandy is not the same Vandy from years past. I will wait for your next insightful response about football.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No problem Coot


Sep 2, 2012, 10:12 AM

Keep your "Doo Doo" colored glasses on.

If your team thinks Vandy was rough, Missouri is going to enjoying being placed in your week ### division. Get ready for a nice SEC loss at home there!

And watch out for those pesky Pirates, no Garcia to save Shaws ### this time.

You propably wont drop because of SEC homerism, but remember they really dont respect you and will toss you aside very quickly.

Cant wait to watch your drop down the polls!!!

You might try FGF, at least a few of them recognize how ###### you looked thur!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wait what


Sep 2, 2012, 10:12 AM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]

The thursday night game looked sloppy. If Vandy had any sort of offense it would have been over in the first half. Both teams couldn't move the ball because they kept shooting themselves in the foot and the defenses looked decent at best. Vandy will lose to every east team except possibly florida. Don't get your hopes up about playing in ATL. I see a bulldog repeat on taking the east.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wait what


Sep 2, 2012, 10:18 AM

Never said we looked good Thursday night. I know we didn't look good. Our D played decent other than two breakdowns where they gained over half their total yardage. But to say Vandy is much less than Auburn if at all is ignorant. We dont play well and squeak out a road win against a team who publicly called the game their super bowl and we suck. Clemson squeaks by an unranked SEC team that is 7th best at best and took a heisman performance by Ellington and it is a "signature win".

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wait what


Sep 2, 2012, 10:23 AM

one poll had auburn at 24, i didn't see vandy in any polls. usuc is not as good as they were last year,and that is easy to see.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Funny thing is


Sep 2, 2012, 10:23 AM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]

I heard heisman mentioned in regards to Latti thur.

What we are saying is Vandy did not look good, and Auburn did look better than them.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And i have no problem


Sep 2, 2012, 10:26 AM

saying that Auburn is not top tier! And it will take alot more to beat the likes of FSU, and VaTech.

But i have an easy time saying Auburn looked better than Vandy.

If you disagree fine, but you better hope your coaches dont think that, because I think they have alot more to fix than we do!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re:Vandy looked as good as SC, if not better.***


Sep 2, 2012, 10:42 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hahahahaha


Sep 2, 2012, 10:31 AM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]

It's funny how people see different things. You squeaked by the 11th place SEC team and you want to try to play down or game. Just admit that you guys looked horrible. We by far didn't play a perfect game, but our problems we self inflicted. We can address those. You guys couldn't get anything going and had to ride your injured qb. BTW, we had more than Ellington making plays last night. How many catches did your leading receiver have against Vandy? Of course you need a qb that can actually throw.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And squeak by


Sep 2, 2012, 10:31 AM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]

means the other team driving hard on your ### and you have to get away with a obvious pass interference to stop them in the final seconds.

And so Auburns 7th best, where do you put Vandy 6th. I mean we already know you are 5th, everytime we see those bling rings!

Watch out, i think Missouri might be pumping you down some! And Tenn might be ready to put you back in your place also!

I hope you dont drop down to 10th place, that extra number is going to cost alot for the "Josten" rings!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: And squeak by


Sep 2, 2012, 10:41 AM

Is the 5th place rings getting old yet? You do realize that makes yall look even worse right? To get spanked by the "5th place rings" team? But that is getting off topic. Vandys big plays were self inflicted as well, so it could go both ways. In no way am I saying we played well and we will have to play much better if we want to have a successful season. I think Vandy and Auburn would be a toss up if they played on a neutral site. As I said we will see as the season goes on. We have to play much better against the better teams in the East. As yall will have to play better against FSU, VT, and maybe GT. I will be back to discuss as the season goes with those who actually enjoy discussing football.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You guys have stomped us the last 3 years. No one's denying


Sep 2, 2012, 11:46 AM

that. But getting 5th place rings is a ####### joke.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Yeah, SCU looked horrible. Even worse, you were playing


Sep 2, 2012, 11:40 AM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]

a weak opponent.

edit - can't spell.


Message was edited by: tigerdrummer®


2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: Yeah, SCU looked horrible. Even worse, you were playing


Sep 2, 2012, 11:45 AM

No "weeker" than Auburn.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I didn't know that perfect grammar was a requirement for


Sep 2, 2012, 11:49 AM

delivering pizzas.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: I didn't know that perfect grammar was a requirement for


Sep 2, 2012, 11:53 AM

Apparently is isn't a requirement where you live huh? Second time I have gotten the delivering pizzas line in this thread. Time for some new material guys. I am just here to talk about football. I know some of you make yourself feel better when discussing football throwing out these original put downs. I actually enjoy discussing both sides, weaknesses and strengths. I know some enjoy just talking about how great their team is and how they have no faults and they can do nothing wrong.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Oh, heaven forbid I made a gramatical error on the internet!


Sep 2, 2012, 11:56 AM

You must be perfect in every way! Except when it comes to getting into college AMIRITE?!

10 bucks says you didn't even go to SCU.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


And you calling Auburn weak is ironic.


Sep 2, 2012, 11:54 AM [ in reply to Re: Yeah, SCU looked horrible. Even worse, you were playing ]

SCU can't beat them, and haven't since '33.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: And you calling Auburn weak is ironic.


Sep 2, 2012, 11:57 AM

Never used the word "weak" to describe them. And we haven't played their 2012 team so no one knows how that game would play out.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How about that 2011 team? Or 2010?


Sep 2, 2012, 12:01 PM

Lets hear it.

Tell me all about Spurrier and his fantastic game management skills - the reason you lost in 2011.

And, with your best team ever, you gave up 56 to AU in your biggest game ever.

Your team sucks.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: How about that 2011 team? Or 2010?


Sep 2, 2012, 12:07 PM

Changing the subject to previous seasons? I make no excuses for 2011, we played poorly, especially Garcia. We gave up 56 to the National Champs in 2010. Yall gave up 70 to West Virginia, so does that mean your team sucks even worse? and if we suck, you lost to this sucky team 3 years in a row. This could go all day bro. Let me guess, Clemson is going undefeated, going to win it all, Ellington will win the heisman, Dabo COY?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah, we did lose to your sucky team 3 years in a row.


Sep 2, 2012, 12:09 PM

You beat us flat out. It's just ironic that your best team ever, didn't win ####.

You're right, this can go all day - which I'm sure you have. Later "bro."

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: Yeah, SCU looked horrible. Even worse, you were playing


Sep 2, 2012, 11:48 AM [ in reply to Yeah, SCU looked horrible. Even worse, you were playing ]

"week" LOL

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

A coot disguised at a tiger LOL***


Sep 2, 2012, 11:49 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


They play at Vandy on Oct 20th.


Sep 2, 2012, 12:37 PM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]

I'll give you Vandy +14 right now.

2024 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

USuC was given the game....


Sep 2, 2012, 10:44 AM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]

with the no call on the Swearinger interference.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: USuC was given the game....


Sep 2, 2012, 10:47 AM

There were no calls that went against us earlier in the game. And were they going to get 6 points automatically if it had been called? They had not been successful getting into the end zone all game other than a fluke mistake by our safety. To say they would have won even if it was called is a stretch at best.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah, you're right...they missed holding on your oline


Sep 2, 2012, 11:43 AM

all night.

And how about in the 2nd quarter when Clowney checked himself out of the game to get water. Classic.


#### you coot, get off tigernet.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: USuC was given the game....


Sep 2, 2012, 11:00 AM [ in reply to USuC was given the game.... ]

I agree they missed the pass interference call but we got the Boyd fumble overturned and honestly, it looked like a fumble all the way to me. Both teams had some calls that were questionable and a few non-calls as well.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wait what


Sep 2, 2012, 10:56 AM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]

I think Vandy and Auburn are close, but not the same team. Auburn is down, they have talent to be very good and Vandy is up with the talent and coaching to be even better. I think Clemson played fairly well and USC didn't play their best game but if we judge our seasons by 8 quarters of football why play the other 11 games? We will see how both teams play against the tougher teams on the schedule (Virginia Tech, Florida State, USC) (Georgia, Florida, LSU, Clemson.)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wait what


Sep 2, 2012, 10:58 AM

Fla is no better than Vandy

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wait what


Sep 2, 2012, 11:01 AM

Ok you got me there, I was just trying to throw another team out there haha.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cause Florida is terrible.***


Sep 2, 2012, 11:44 AM [ in reply to Re: Wait what ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: You are out of your gourd.***


Sep 2, 2012, 10:40 AM [ in reply to Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls? ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

LMFAO. Delusional.***


Sep 2, 2012, 11:37 AM [ in reply to Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls? ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


13th, maybe 12th. MIchigan got killed and will drop fo sho.


Sep 2, 2012, 9:53 AM

Wisconsin should drop for squeaking by one of the little guys, but they probably wont. Everyone else above us pretty much did what they should have done.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?


Sep 2, 2012, 10:07 AM

IMO, 2 teams played decent opponents Saturday. Us and Bama. Both won with Bama blowing the doors off Michigan. Georgia struggled against mighty Buffalo. Florida struggled against mighty BGU. Carolina struggled against Vandy. Wisconsin looked god awful as well. FSU, Oregon, and Okie State want to beat there chest about beating teams that freaking Grayson High School could thump. Personally, I think none of them really showed anything. Clemson should realistically should be around 8th, but probably won't due to the ignorance that seems prevelent these days. Sort of like the troll talking above about Vandy being every bit as good as Auburn.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

i predict 12th


Sep 2, 2012, 10:28 AM

USuCk will be ab # 10. they love them. they won't drop much

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hoping for a nice bump....


Sep 2, 2012, 10:29 AM

We should pick up 1, maybe 2 spots for sure. Remember that some clowns didn't have us ranked at all on their ballots, and it would be well-nigh impossible for them to do so now.

At the same time, others who actually did their homework and had us ranked low for O Line concerns should have been mollified after last night.

In the end, I'm expecting 12, hoping for higher. but I'm not especially sweating it at all.

badge-donor-20yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-revdodd.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?


Sep 2, 2012, 10:29 AM

Who cares... the polls shouldn't come out until week 5 anyway.

But i will say that 12th is about right

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think we will fall uphilll..........................***


Sep 2, 2012, 10:32 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?


Sep 2, 2012, 10:37 AM

It does not matter at this point. Keep winning and the rankings will take care of themselves. We beat an unranked opponent by a touchdown at a neutral site. No need to get ahead of ourselves.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I disagree. Michigan got completely exposed. They'll be


Sep 2, 2012, 10:47 AM

lucky to be 15th.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Where do you think we will fall in the new polls?


Sep 2, 2012, 11:35 AM

Don't forget the IRISH!! Had a big W yesterday.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Status quo. Stay at 14***


Sep 2, 2012, 12:43 PM



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 49
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic