|
Replies: 16
| visibility 9
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
S/O to the poster last week catching hell about Zac Brooks
Oct 12, 2015, 12:05 PM
|
|
Being obviously the best #2 RB on the field. You nailed it dude.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105933]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
He didn't catch anything about Brooks being the best
Oct 12, 2015, 12:06 PM
|
|
backup, he caught he!l because he was wrong about the depth chart and backtracked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
As I recall it, he was saying the depth chart
Oct 12, 2015, 12:08 PM
|
|
didn't reflect playing time on the field and that Brooks SHOULD be the #2 on that previous week's depth chart.
But you'd know better than me 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105933]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
Well, I would agree with you but then we'd both be wrong***
Oct 12, 2015, 12:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
He was right about the depth chart the first RB to spell..
Oct 12, 2015, 12:13 PM
[ in reply to He didn't catch anything about Brooks being the best ] |
|
Gallman was Brooks. CJ Davidson didn't play until near the end of the 3rd qtr. You and your buddies were wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [37033]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 16331
Joined: 2008
|
^^^^RA'd
Oct 12, 2015, 12:29 PM
|
|
for whining about other people's signatures then launching a personal attack in his own!
Please don't shove me down without even punching me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Yeah he was completely correct, where us that troll clique that attacked him for the claim...
Oct 12, 2015, 12:09 PM
|
|
Oh, they got slayed again. This time by babganoush
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
55
Posts: 28685
Joined: 2005
|
no looting going on today?***
Oct 12, 2015, 12:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [87648]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 45522
Joined: 2004
|
plunder the lox.***
Oct 12, 2015, 1:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19353]
TigerPulse: 92%
52
Posts: 22266
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
22
|
Re: S/O to the poster last week catching hell about Zac Brooks
Oct 12, 2015, 12:12 PM
|
|
Thank you. It was obvious
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
I'm glad he's back to full speed
Oct 12, 2015, 12:13 PM
|
|
he really showed off his speed on that run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
22
|
Re: I'm glad he's back to full speed
Oct 12, 2015, 12:16 PM
|
|
Brooks has exceeded my exceptions. I gotta say I was down on him during the summer but happy to say I was wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
55
Posts: 28685
Joined: 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
22
|
Re: that's not what you said***
Oct 12, 2015, 12:26 PM
|
|
I said the depth chart that was released at RB is not how I think the coaches really see it and the game will not play out that way. Brooks was the real number 2. Think the depth chart was done that way to surprise GT with brooks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 58393
Joined: 2003
|
Seemed pretty obvious
Oct 12, 2015, 12:17 PM
|
|
Dude was supposed to start last year. He looks a lot bigger this year, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19353]
TigerPulse: 92%
52
Posts: 22266
Joined: 2004
|
Re: S/O to the poster last week catching hell about Zac Brooks
Oct 12, 2015, 1:00 PM
|
|
That wasnt the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 9
|
|
|
50
