Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 250
Joined: 2/19/17
|
All of Brads close losses should count for something right?
Mar 22, 2017, 12:03 PM
|
|
I've seen this argument on here showing how "close" we were to possibly .500 or better in the ACC and making the tourney. Funny how these count as almost wins to you Pumpers... But you fail to mention the games that could have very easily been a loss... 2 pt win over Nebraska, 2 pt win over USuCk, 5 pt win over Wake, 4 pt win over NCST.... So keep pumping the what ifs had we won some of those close losses.... Just don't forget how we could have easily been 13-20 overall, 4-14 ACC.
|
|
|
|
Legend [17918]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8942
Joined: 12/24/96
|
They are, under the LOSS column
Mar 22, 2017, 12:05 PM
|
|
But CU basketball is on the EIGHT year step up program so...
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17300]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14243
Joined: 12/14/98
|
After thoughtful analysis, they count as losses.***
Mar 22, 2017, 12:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2533]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 4161
Joined: 10/10/08
|
Absolutely
Mar 22, 2017, 12:16 PM
|
|
And add in a few shameful blowouts, and don't forget the dismal first round NIT game on our home floor.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96873]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29215
Joined: 9/14/05
|
What is your threshold for "could have very easily been a
Mar 22, 2017, 12:19 PM
|
|
loss"? Theoretically they all could have been losses.
But they weren't.
BTW can you work on posting in the correct bored? The mods thank you in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [140604]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33881
Joined: 12/5/10
|
Was this not football related?***
Mar 22, 2017, 12:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 250
Joined: 2/19/17
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1077]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 1529
Joined: 8/15/15
|
Re: Tnet mobile defaults to football board***
Mar 22, 2017, 1:05 PM
|
|
Pretty knowledgeable about Tnet to be a walk-on...
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16158]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26450
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: All of Brads close losses should count for something right?
Mar 22, 2017, 12:19 PM
|
|
The win over USUC was without their best player - Thornwell. They would have curb-stomped us with him on the floor.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [645]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 740
Joined: 12/20/02
|
Re: All of Brads close losses should count for something right?
Mar 22, 2017, 12:24 PM
|
|
As Bill Parcells says: "You are what your record says you are."
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8614
Joined: 10/27/00
|
Re: All of Brads close losses should count for something right?
Mar 22, 2017, 12:39 PM
|
|
Losing to Oakland in the N.A.T. should count as about 4 losses.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96873]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29215
Joined: 9/14/05
|
Was that a Freudian slip?***
Mar 22, 2017, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Are you suggesting that close losses are the equivalent of
Mar 22, 2017, 12:57 PM
|
|
drinking a glass of failnog?
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 250
Joined: 2/19/17
|
Depends, what the crap is fail nog?
Mar 22, 2017, 1:00 PM
|
|
Typo for EGG nog?
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96873]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29215
Joined: 9/14/05
|
Re: Depends, what the crap is fail nog?***
Mar 22, 2017, 1:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Is that brand all NAT
Mar 22, 2017, 1:02 PM
|
|
ural?
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8614
Joined: 10/27/00
|
BlueRidge spelled backwards is
Mar 22, 2017, 1:09 PM
|
|
North... wait.
Let me do the math again...
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 250
Joined: 2/19/17
|
|
|
|
Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
|
|