Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
TNET: Notable PFF grades and playing time breakdown from Clemson's loss to LSU
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 7
| visibility 1150

TNET: Notable PFF grades and playing time breakdown from Clemson's loss to LSU


Sep 1, 2025, 10:23 AM
Reply

 
Notable PFF grades and playing time breakdown from Clemson's loss to LSU

Read Update »


flag link
military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Notable PFF grades and playing time breakdown from Clemson's loss to LSU

3

Sep 1, 2025, 10:38 AM
Reply

Oh boy, I thought Sammy Brown was tearing it up, very interesting to see how PFF tells a different story

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Notable PFF grades and playing time breakdown from Clemson's loss to LSU

3

Sep 1, 2025, 10:40 AM
Reply

I think in the run game he was excellent. He allowed several short completions which affects his computed grade but I think I’d live with continued performances like that from him.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Notable PFF grades and playing time breakdown from Clemson's loss to LSU


Sep 1, 2025, 9:27 PM
Reply


I think in the run game he was excellent. He allowed several short completions which affects his computed grade but I think I’d live with continued performances like that from him.


Wonder if some of those were the middle screens that we could not seem to stop? I'm quite certain Brown has all the tools to cover. If he was out of position I feel equally as good that it will be corrected.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Notable PFF grades and playing time breakdown from Clemson's loss to LSU

1

Sep 1, 2025, 12:59 PM
Reply

Which shows that we were average across the board. The Defense was considerably better than the offense but this was a team loss. The PI/holdings by Hampton were maddening. He’s got to have better technique than that. The roughing the passer on Parker was BS IMO. Wussmeir put on an Oscar worthy performance

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: TNET: Notable PFF grades and playing time breakdown from Clemson's loss to LSU


Sep 1, 2025, 4:22 PM
Reply

Agreed…better grade outs overall than I (the harshest critic) saw but yes D was a little better than O…why weren’t we compensating for the heavy venables like blitzing??? Payback huh? Screen passes…quick/hot reads are the qbs best friend to burn Ds that blitz so much.

They looked quicker than us all night when they had the ball…I can’t believe they only ran for 110 and had only 350 total yds…

Well O can certainly be improved with MORE RUSHING ATTs!!! And a back of the head slap for Cade to start seeing D after snap reads!!

Go Tigers!! With revised expectations until I see it…

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Run O grade of 66


Sep 4, 2025, 11:18 AM
Reply

Care to take a swing at that one? We averaged ~1.6 YPC. That is absolute garbage

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Run O grade of 66


Sep 4, 2025, 11:35 AM
Reply

I think it's pointing to the run blocking, which had a 57.3. So the 66ish grade is more pointing to what the runners could do with the blocking:

https://twitter.com/LandonTengwall/status/1963609645919903907

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 7
| visibility 1150
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic