|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1355
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55940]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 35039
Joined: 2015
|
I mean, I'm hoping what I'm seeing is the 4d chess
Mar 13, 2025, 9:03 AM
|
|
I'm hoping that the volitility with tarriffs is a way for other countries to pick up the slack where we were "supposedly" being taken advantage of in foreign trade.
I'm hoping the talking about a recession will lead to the market correction we are overdue for.
I'm hoping the back and forth with Ukraine is to force the EU and NATO to up their support so it doesn't mostly fall on us.
I'm hoping that the stress test of DOGE is used to see what can and can not be cut through just cutting it and seeing what happens.
I'm hoping that in 3-4 years we will be looking back going, Ok I get it now.
Most likely not though
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [74793]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 26133
Joined: 2017
|
Lets slow it down a little
2
Mar 13, 2025, 9:13 AM
|
|
US was not paying tariffs on cars coming from Canada, zero. Canada had a 45% tariff on importing cars from US. Been that way for years.
Stellantis, GM, they send production to Canada, WHY? well that is because they do not have to pay insurance, so they can pay the worker in Canada $2 more an hour. Car stays cheaper to produce. Who pays for the workers insurance? The government, where does the government get that money, the taxpayers. Canada doesn't spend jack on defense (been called a NATO "deadweight" for years) so they can spend on social programs. See how that works?
So why should we be exporting jobs, paying 300% cheese/milk, 50% copper, 25% steel tariffs when Canada is paying zero.
Its time for Countries to start paying their fair share back to the US.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24725]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 19228
Joined: 1998
|
Trump negotiated the USMCA trade agreement in 2019
1
Mar 13, 2025, 9:25 AM
|
|
If it needs to be reopened, then do so in a non-confrontational and professional manner as opposed to threats and bullying. Any leader of a country has to respond forcefully to threats and intimidation targeting their country’s best interests and national pride. Foreign policy is best performed behind closed doors so that emotional nationalism doesn’t override economic and security pragmatism.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27854]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48316
Joined: 2010
|
How about a Powerpoint Chart showing all the various tariff discrepancies...***
Mar 13, 2025, 9:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17392]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18655
Joined: 1999
|
That would be great. Do you have that?
Mar 13, 2025, 9:56 AM
|
|
I'd love to see a pre-trade war detailed side-by-side on US vs Canadian customs by product.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17392]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18655
Joined: 1999
|
Let's slow down even more...
2
Mar 13, 2025, 9:48 AM
[ in reply to Lets slow it down a little ] |
|
Can you provide a link documenting Canada's 45% tariff on US cars that has been in place for years? The internet is so bogged down with current news that I have been unable to find anything that supports that.
I am assuming that yes, Canadian workers' insurance is paid directly by the state, but then what is their tax burden relative to the US? I really don't know. I know Canadian labor is more expensive on average than the US, but I am not sure how this all plays out with regard to taxes, insurance, etc. I would guess that there are some other significant cost drivers also at play in these determinations. Do you have any documentation that you can provide that shows that the US builds cars in Canada to reduce the cost of labor?
I think we have been over the "300% cheese/milk" nonsense. These tariffs are not paid. They are implemented once a threshold is met. The threshold is never met. NOW...is the threshold never met because of the tariff? I dunno. What are the sales opportunity costs associated with that tariff. Put simply...are we selling 99,999 gallons of milk to Canada an no more because because of the huge tariff at 100,000 gallons...and without that huge tariff...would we sell 103,000 or 1,000,000 gallons?
Link to 50% tariff on copper (pre-trade war, of course)? Link to 25% tariff on steel?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5879]
TigerPulse: 47%
39
Posts: 18946
Joined: 2005
|
Do you have a source of these 45% tariffs on US automobiles?
Mar 13, 2025, 10:01 AM
[ in reply to Lets slow it down a little ] |
|
Because automobiles were explicitly negotiated in the USMCA.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13641
Joined: 2007
|
Employers in Canada pay healthcare taxes
Mar 13, 2025, 10:06 AM
[ in reply to Lets slow it down a little ] |
|
and there's no 45% tariff on cars imported from the US. Not sure where you got that idea. Twitter?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [110]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Employers in Canada pay healthcare taxes
Mar 13, 2025, 6:03 PM
|
|
Just Dumb says there is no tariff or something different than 45%?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24725]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 19228
Joined: 1998
|
I'm hoping we invade Canada _ and Greenland. Maybe Mexico and Australia!***
1
Mar 13, 2025, 9:14 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30994]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 21440
Joined: 2024
|
Re: I'm hoping we invade Canada _ and Greenland. Maybe Mexico and Australia!***
Mar 13, 2025, 10:05 AM
|
|
I am hoping we take over Baja. There is some nice beachfront property that is just being wasted on nature. There should be more hotels and condos there.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12420]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 13377
Joined: 1999
|
Trump hunkered down in FL for 2 months after the election and came up with
Mar 13, 2025, 9:16 AM
|
|
this strategy (with many advisors). So - I keep hoping there is a method to this madness.
But - yeah - apparently, they were just having a 2-month-long rager.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30994]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 21440
Joined: 2024
|
Re: I mean, I'm hoping what I'm seeing is the 4d chess
Mar 13, 2025, 10:04 AM
|
|
Keowee said everything is great.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [113050]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 73083
Joined: 2002
|
Trump is clueless
Mar 13, 2025, 10:56 AM
|
|
I keep hearing Trump say his ultimate goal is to bring those manufacturing jobs back to the US. Does he not have a clue why those jobs left to begin with? Because they could be done 10x cheaper NOT in the US. So you're going to take a job currently in a Guatemalan sweat factory making t-shirts at $1.27 a pop, move that plant back to the US, with the added insurance and regulations (build/rebuild a textile mill), then pay someone $20/hr to make the shirts someone else did at $1/hr did in Guatemala, and SOMEHOW you're going to find enough cubicle minions from around the country, several thousand, to choose to work in a US t-shirt factory for $20/hr when their cubicle job paid $40/hr?
AND in the end, do you expect to sell as many T-shirts when the base shirt costs $20 instead of $1?
It's insane. Heck, they say 10 million illegals are working in the US. If you send them home, WHO THE #### is going to do the work they're doing, PLUS all the work lost to overseas being cheaper?
It is perhaps Trump's best, and ONLY tool he can wield, as President, to wreck the economy. And kick out all illegals, that would help too. Trump comes from a worldview where if you have money, labor mysteriously appears. Yes, when America had 6, 8, 10% unemployment, and less money, if you had it labor would come. But there is no math on Earth that says with 330 million people, heck 170 or even 180 million actual workers, can we ever hope to retain a $28T GDP, or $20T in consumption. We can't. Not enough people. Heck, kick out all illegals, and then replace their jobs with the 100% of the 4.1% who are unemployed, we still have a net shortage of labor, and that's not counting the added demands to make stuff in the US with tariffs. Then add some contrived necessity, through tariffs, to make everything inside the US, and we're double screwed.
What will eventually happen, and we're beginning to see it, is the collapse of the credit/debt markets. And this won't be mortgages, or credit cards, or auto loans, it will be ALL DEBT. I could explain why, but it would take too long.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [110]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Trump is clueless
Mar 13, 2025, 6:14 PM
|
|
You are so much smarter than Trump, you should be POTUS or at least in the cabinet. It'd be a great idea for him to get smart people around him.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2131]
TigerPulse: 99%
32
|
Re: Trump is clueless
1
Mar 13, 2025, 6:22 PM
|
|
I know you’re being sarcastic, but you’re speaking truth lol
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2863]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
A good portion of the country is considerably
Mar 13, 2025, 11:20 PM
[ in reply to Re: Trump is clueless ] |
|
smarter than Trump. That’s a low bar.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [78]
TigerPulse: 100%
8
|
The popular vote shows a majority are dumber than trump.***
Mar 14, 2025, 1:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1355
|
|
|