|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
Heisman Winner [139932]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33856
Joined: 12/5/10
|
It surprises me that the NFL has such a bad overtime rule.
Feb 6, 2017, 6:46 AM
|
|
I'm not an NFL guy, so take this with a grade of slaw, but it feels anti-climactic. Why would both teams not get a shot at scoring a TD?
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [5012]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 6039
Joined: 10/9/08
|
Agree. I like the idea of an extra quarter of time...
Feb 6, 2017, 7:06 AM
|
|
Not sudden death. I think college should do an extra quarter too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [139932]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33856
Joined: 12/5/10
|
I think college got it right, but an extra quarter would be
Feb 6, 2017, 7:10 AM
|
|
much better than what the NFL has now, with some scores being sudden death, while others require the game to continue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1599]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3020
Joined: 1/30/05
|
The defense just has to keep the team from getting a TD
Feb 6, 2017, 8:04 AM
|
|
and they get a shot to win or tie. College is a little hokey getting the ball in field goal range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [139932]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33856
Joined: 12/5/10
|
Exactly my point. Some scores are sudden death, others are
Feb 6, 2017, 8:14 AM
|
|
not. I'm not sure why both teams don't get the same opportunity. Clear advantage to the winner of the coin flip. Should such an advantage be left to the flip of a coin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40100]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18284
Joined: 10/28/15
|
Are you Sirius? This seems Sirius. I don't know that it
Feb 6, 2017, 8:33 AM
|
|
Matters during the regular season but for the Super Bowl it does seem to be odd. I guess the rules are the rules. But who didn't think that NE wins if they win the coin toss. Had the momentum. I'm sure others have thought this but NE had run 70 something offensive plays I think and Atlanta was still in the 40s. I think atlantas defefense was more tired. Especially since ne's defense took the second quarter off
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [139932]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33856
Joined: 12/5/10
|
Yes, serious. Again, I'm not an NFL fan, but I would have
Feb 6, 2017, 8:35 AM
|
|
rather seen the two teams trade punches in OT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2383]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1882
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: I think college got it right, but an extra quarter would be
Feb 6, 2017, 8:16 AM
[ in reply to I think college got it right, but an extra quarter would be ] |
|
The overtime system and the pass interference spot-of-foul penalty (making a 60-yard penalty possible based on the judgment of a referee) are the two things that make the NFL virtually unwatchable for me. Every time I get mildly interested, one of those things happens and my outrage drives me away again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [409]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 545
Joined: 9/1/13
|
By far the most uncompetitive way to end a game
Feb 6, 2017, 8:17 AM
|
|
The NFL needs to look in the mirror on that dumba$$ rule and find something new.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33200
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: It surprises me that the NFL has such a bad overtime rule.
Feb 6, 2017, 8:23 AM
|
|
NFL overtime process is far inferior to the NCAA's idea .
Neither are perfect , but the NCAA version seems like a better option considering that both teams have equal chances to begin overtime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [61795]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39635
Joined: 12/16/01
|
I have found the best thing to do is to not care.***
Feb 6, 2017, 8:28 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [139932]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33856
Joined: 12/5/10
|
Agreed.***
Feb 6, 2017, 8:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96831]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29208
Joined: 9/14/05
|
I'm sure you'd be OK with the NFL overtime rule if you
Feb 6, 2017, 8:34 AM
|
|
weren't a butthurt Falcons fan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [147]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 483
Joined: 11/13/00
|
Re: It surprises me that the NFL has such a bad overtime rule.
Feb 6, 2017, 10:54 AM
|
|
At first glance, it seems horribly unfair. But, in the end, a team still has to get a defensive stop to win the game. And by continuing the "sudden death" in the case of a field goal, they are rewarded for their stop. I can see both sides of the argument, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13360]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9886
Joined: 1/23/06
|
So you are saying its unfair
Feb 6, 2017, 11:07 AM
|
|
Cuz the Pats didnt get a chance to get a defensive stop right??
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11188]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5532
Joined: 11/22/15
|
Re: It surprises me that the NFL has such a bad overtime rule.
Feb 6, 2017, 11:22 AM
[ in reply to Re: It surprises me that the NFL has such a bad overtime rule. ] |
|
At that point in the game, both defenses are gassed. Whoever wins the coin toss has a decisive advantage. I can't image how pised I would be if Clemson lost in that manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11188]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5532
Joined: 11/22/15
|
Re: It surprises me that the NFL has such a bad overtime rule.
Feb 6, 2017, 11:15 AM
|
|
What is the point in the ot game clock? No one seems to know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
