|
Replies: 55
| visibility 1567
|
Commissioner [1206]
TigerPulse: 93%
27
|
SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 3:35 PM
|
|
SCAR didn't play Auburn, LSU, or Auburn this year. They played in a weak SEC East where Florida, Georgia, and Tennessee had down years. All of this and they still couldn't make it to the title game, where they would have been steam rolled by Auburn. Yeah they beat us, yeah it sucks, but besides us they really don't have a great resume. Look at our last 3 years, we have beat Virginia Tech (3x), FSU, Auburn (2x), LSU, Georgia, and Ohio State.
|
|
|
|
 |
Commissioner [1206]
TigerPulse: 93%
27
|
Sorry, Alabama***
Jan 7, 2014, 3:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [57]
TigerPulse: 48%
6
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 3:44 PM
|
|
You must be joking.
We beat (3) of the final AP and Coaches Poll top ten ranked teams, (2) BCS winners, and (5) top twenty-five teams overall during the season, and our last (6) games in a row. We also finished 11-2 the last three years, something your program has never done.
Talk your "spin crap" all you want regarding 5th place rings and all that. You have had the most success in your program in thirty years, and we still finished ranked ahead of you every year, and beat you guys head to head the last five times.
Bottom line- …..4th, 8th, 9th “FINAL POLLS” the last three years. That's all that matters in the end. The “Final Rankings” determine the success of a team’s season from a national perspective. Ya’ll know that.
You guys have a good program and team that appears to be on the rise. No question about it.
But we have unequivocally, without a shadow of a doubt passed you by. At least for now.
Deal with it and get better.
Oh, and congrats on your bowl win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11115]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13631
Joined: 2003
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 4:01 PM
|
|
Here is the real deal #### breath. You finished ranked fourth without jack #### to show for it. It just happens to be the way the cards fell that you are ranked this high. You clowns will NEVER win the SEC or anything that is recognized as a championship by anyone other than your man boob laden head ball sack. That is the truth so deal with it! By the way we are still not impressed. You can now go back to FGF because we really don't give 2 ##### about your team or your inbred fanbase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
UCF plays in a crap conference. Missou was without their QB
Jan 7, 2014, 8:37 PM
[ in reply to Re: SCAR Reality..... ] |
|
Since we love the crap conference excuse, UCF falls under that neatly.
Missouri was without their starting QB, and you STILL almost lost to them.
You beat us, but we basically Gamecocked it up like you did at TN (go Vols).
Then you beat an overmatched Wisco THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE BEAT ANYWAY. Come on, now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [5]
TigerPulse: 50%
1
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 3:46 PM
|
|
You're kidding, right?
SC beat 6 (SIX!) teams that won their respective bowl games: Clemson (Orange), UCF (Fiesta), Missouri (Cotton), North Carolina (Belk), Mississippi State (Liberty) and Vanderbilt (BBVA Compass). Two of those are BCS bowl winners. There's not much room for Clemson to talk, who beat one team ranked in the final polls (a very overrated Ohio State).
Yes, South Carolina lost to Georgia, who Clemson beat, and Tennessee, but this is the SEC. Clemson was DOMINATED by Florida state, and lost to South Carolina for the 5th year in a row, by double digits. Not much to argue about that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11115]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13631
Joined: 2003
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 4:03 PM
|
|
YAWN,not impressed now you may go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
You lost to an unranked team. Your argument is moot.
Jan 7, 2014, 8:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: SCAR Reality..... ] |
|
You "pulled a SCU". Every year you lose to someone you shouldn't, then go talk about pulling a Clemson. If it isn't TN, it's Vandy or UK.
I like how you completely avoided playing Bama, LSU, or Auburn this year. You guys love that UNC loss, never mind that they are on probation and were in a mess early in the season.
UCF got in because there were no better options. I can't believe how much you guys hyped up that win. It was a game you were supposed to win against what amounts to a high level mid-major.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 3:52 PM
|
|
We beat 3 top 12 teams in the final poll, 6 bowl winners, and 2 BCS bowl winners. Pretty good resume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24894]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17252
Joined: 2002
|
Tell 'em coot
Jan 7, 2014, 3:56 PM
|
|
and all you get is that lousy tshirt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
Re: Tell 'em coot
Jan 7, 2014, 4:29 PM
|
|
And a top 5 ranking it appears a lot of people around here are quite upset about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
***YAWN******
Jan 7, 2014, 6:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4309]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Tell 'em coot
Jan 7, 2014, 8:12 PM
[ in reply to Tell 'em coot ] |
|
Not true. They also got 3 years probation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [765]
TigerPulse: 99%
22
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 4:01 PM
|
|
Over-rated at number 4. Several teams that finished 11-2 are better. Good season but not number 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [59]
TigerPulse: 100%
6
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 4:02 PM
[ in reply to Re: SCAR Reality..... ] |
|
Just like Auburn Fans say about Scar, "Alabama mouth and a Vanderbilt trophy case."
Enjoy the best years of your pathetic programs history. It will be over soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [202]
TigerPulse: 31%
13
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 6:37 PM
|
|
When was the best years of your program because no time in your teams history have you had a 4 year run or a 3 year run that we have had.
Again, in your so called storied program, you have never finished top 10 3 seasons in a row or had a 4 year period as we are having right now.
If I'm wrong tell me when you have. The funny thing is, this is your best ever run and we've whipped you 5 years in a row.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
Storied programs have more than just 3 years of success
Jan 7, 2014, 6:38 PM
|
|
over the course of their program's history.
The more you know...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [202]
TigerPulse: 31%
13
|
Re: Storied programs have more than just 3 years of success
Jan 7, 2014, 6:50 PM
|
|
I am fascinated by what you call a storied program. You think Clemson is a storied program, really?? You want to check some numbers and tell me how you're a storied program?
You may be storied in your mind but I guarantee you it is only your mind.
Let's look at it like this:
How many times over a period of time, say 50 years would a program need to be ranked to be considered a storied program?
Half the time, 75%, how many would you think would be needed to be considered storied??
Again, in your wonderful vision of great history of Clemson football you have never had a better period of football than we have had the past 4 seasons, and you are a storied program.
So, let me know how many times you would need to be ranked to be a storied program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
Never said that
Jan 7, 2014, 6:52 PM
|
|
But thanks for making me smile knowing something so easily gets under your skin.
Go play in traffic now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [202]
TigerPulse: 31%
13
|
Re: Never said that
Jan 7, 2014, 6:57 PM
|
|
Not under my skin, you guys had a very good season and our rivalry is growing in national recognition. We already have best baseball rivalry and there are not many football rivals that are as good as Clemson and South Carolina right now.
Hope you have a good evening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
You, too, good sir. :)***
Jan 7, 2014, 7:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [15]
TigerPulse: 71%
2
|
Re: Storied programs have more than just 3 years of success
Jan 7, 2014, 7:00 PM
[ in reply to Re: Storied programs have more than just 3 years of success ] |
|
Clemson had the same run in the late 80's from 86-89 very similarly to what South Carolina is doing now. Clemson would have had 11 win season instead of 10 win seasons had at that time schools would have added a cupcake school to make up a 12-game schedule. The only difference that Clemson has on South Carolina during that time is conference championships. I know the SEC is a tougher conference, but you can not lie that you have had schedules fall your way to play for a conference championship and Scar has not taken care of its business so that's no ones fault but their own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 4%
1
|
Re: Storied programs have more than just 3 years of success
Jan 7, 2014, 8:33 PM
|
|
|
|
WOULD HAVE 2 words CHAMPIONS NEVER USE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
Re: Storied programs have more than just 3 years of success
Jan 8, 2014, 10:27 AM
[ in reply to Re: Storied programs have more than just 3 years of success ] |
|
Wait a minute, you certainly can't point to a run with Citrus Bowls and Gator Bowls as great success. Haven't you been reading the board, it is not a successful season unless you go to the big 4. But I will give you thumbs up for the "if we had played another game that year we lost to Duke we would have won 11."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17543]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 15432
Joined: 1999
|
You may want to look at the 87-89 period
Jan 7, 2014, 9:57 PM
[ in reply to Re: SCAR Reality..... ] |
|
Not final top 10 each of those four years, but top 10 on average. Three back to back 10 win seasons (in 11 game regular seasons), FOUR bowl wins, and TWO ACC CHAMPIONSHIPS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17543]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 15432
Joined: 1999
|
87-90***
Jan 7, 2014, 10:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4867]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
In 15 years...
Jan 7, 2014, 5:07 PM
[ in reply to Re: SCAR Reality..... ] |
|
who's going to remember that SCU finished in the top five and won 11 games three straight years? Only SCU fans.
Without a trophy, acknowledging that you ACTUALLY WON SOMETHING MEANINGFUL, all this is just window-dressing. You're nothing, you'll always be nothing, and you'll never win a championship in the SEC.
Deal with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5411]
TigerPulse: 44%
38
Posts: 17559
Joined: 2005
|
We can just buy a trophy
Jan 7, 2014, 6:04 PM
|
|
problem solved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
Would look good with the 5th place rings***
Jan 7, 2014, 6:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4867]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
Re: We can just buy a trophy
Jan 7, 2014, 7:02 PM
[ in reply to We can just buy a trophy ] |
|
Nothing more pathetic than buying yourself a participation trophy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5411]
TigerPulse: 44%
38
Posts: 17559
Joined: 2005
|
Isn't that what all bowl rings are?***
Jan 7, 2014, 7:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
You guys love that stat, but it doesn't paint the full pictu
Jan 7, 2014, 8:43 PM
[ in reply to Re: SCAR Reality..... ] |
|
Missou without their QB, yet you almost still managed to lose it.
UCF didn't play a tough schedule, of course they are going to be ranked. You didn't do anything impressive by beating them.
Yet you lose to an UNRANKED TN and a UGA team that was already starting to get the injury bug. Also, you avoided playing Bama, LSU, Auburn, or any of the other teams that actually do work in the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
Re: You guys love that stat, but it doesn't paint the full pictu
Jan 8, 2014, 10:55 AM
|
|
You realize you played UGA without their best DB correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1206]
TigerPulse: 93%
27
|
See......
Jan 7, 2014, 4:07 PM
|
|
My point is, go to your SCAR website and speak your mind and beat your chest over your wins, no need to troll our site, in the middle of the week, in the middle of the day. I heard they were going to start showing SEC games on the History Channel because all SEC fans can talk about is their past champions. Which SCAR was nowhere to be seen! Florida, LSU, Auburn, Alabama, and Tennessee earned the SEC it's image, not SCAR. At the end of the day, SCAR is closer to Vanderbilt and Ole Miss than the other championship programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
7
|
If you don't care
Jan 7, 2014, 4:08 PM
|
|
Why take the time to respond whitehurst?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
Why are you even here?***
Jan 7, 2014, 6:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Because you are hilarious
Jan 7, 2014, 8:44 PM
[ in reply to If you don't care ] |
|
You guys really think that you've accomplished something. The rest of the SEC sees you as a joke. You have contributed very little to this SEC brand that you love so much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31532]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 36937
Joined: 2000
|
What's the point?
Jan 7, 2014, 4:09 PM
|
|
Of course the benefited from not playing the toughest teams in their conference, however they played some good teams, and beat us soundly.
Hats off to em. I'm not gonna sound silly and try to downplay their season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1206]
TigerPulse: 93%
27
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 4:12 PM
|
|
True, but then again we are not on a SCAR site talking it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
You would be blacklisted before hitting "Post"
Jan 7, 2014, 6:36 PM
|
|
Plus you would need to be thoroughly cleansed to get all the stank out after visiting their sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1472]
TigerPulse: 97%
29
|
Their schedule has been soft the past 4 years and when they
Jan 7, 2014, 4:20 PM
|
|
did finally play somebody, they usually got beat. Unless of course it was Clemson beating ourselves 3 out of the last 5!!!! 
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [17]
TigerPulse: 13%
2
|
Re: Their schedule has been soft the past 4 years and when they
Jan 7, 2014, 4:52 PM
|
|
This is good entertainment.....kids fighting and arguing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
whatcha watching, a usuc's coaches meeting ?
Jan 7, 2014, 5:03 PM
|
|
just wondering!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2537]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Their schedule has been soft the past 4 years and when they
Jan 7, 2014, 4:59 PM
[ in reply to Their schedule has been soft the past 4 years and when they ] |
|
the reality is more like this:
1) if Clemson "backed into the OB" with an "overrated OSU" team, then USuCk backed into the #4 spot as well, simply by beating 2 teams that won bigger bowl games than you coots.
2) some of the teams the coots beat weren't ranked as high when y'all played, but still managed to do some big things with their seasons, helping pad your rankings. there were some really close games barely won by the coots, but the simple win-loss column can't display that.
3) funny that the coots talk about everyone Clemson played being overrated, but don't want to address all the powerhouses they played this season in their division. Mizzou gave a miracle game to the coots & miraculously have taken a lead after being freshman in the SEC. UCF is...UCF & their conference doesn't really compare either to either the ACC or SEC & would've lost to almost any other decent team in either conference, but deserve some credit for their magic.
4) just like we can't say unbiased, in truth the coots suck (wins & losses over last 3 seasons), just like coots have no room to say OSU was overrated (record speak for itself & title chase).
5) coots won the game with us & last 5, but that doesn't always tell the whole story, just the final. we know how turnovers affected the game, which can't be denied.
6) we both will lose tons of talent, so we'll both have to see who steps up to take the reigns, but who will do better is tough to call, except we're Clemson fans & have our pride & favorite in the fight.
7) conference strength & strength of schedule has alot of weight on the polls but doesn't determine who wins head to head battles. the underdog has just as much of a chance as any team on any day.
8) Steve Spurrier is a childish jerk who uses his manipulative wit to fool his own fanbase as much as we fool ourselves into thinking anything but a conference or national title, or beating USuCk is acceptable when that is the true goal...but you can't win them all & sometimes shine the light on the good things like bowl trophies & rankings, & consistent improvement (every team has to do that)
9) you coots are on a rival's board to brag & make yourselves feel better instead of expressing among yourselves how happy & proud you are of your own team & what you think you will accomplish moving forward. instead you come here to gloat on rankings, having beaten us, pseudo titles, & all in all the best status your team has ever achieved in program history...which is still in the end beating us & having a nice ranking.
10) even with the last 3-5 seasons we've both been close to many of the same goals, wins-losses, rankings , etc... except that we've actually met some of our goals & multiple times. the coots have fallen short on all major goals but beating Clemson having a nice W-L stat & ranking the last three seasons...no hardware however. both teams have room to improve! but we celebrate with other Tigers what we've done & don't seek you coots approval or appreciation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [17]
TigerPulse: 13%
2
|
Re: Their schedule has been soft the past 4 years and when they
Jan 7, 2014, 5:02 PM
|
|
Now that was a good one....now call them names and run to your room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2537]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Their schedule has been soft the past 4 years and when they
Jan 7, 2014, 5:13 PM
|
|
we're talking apples & oranges...that the truth.
we hate you coots & you hate us.
now go tell your coot buddies how much you don't like us & we shouldn't be proud of anything because we don't deserve it.
we'll concede & give you credit for what you have done & nothing more...then discuss what kind of ignorant jerkoff ###### most of you coot fans are that you need to come here to validate yourselves.
not an opinion either, it's justified by you coots taking a stroll on Auburn or any other SEC brethren's board when you guys try to hug up or console them...they hate you as much or more than us for claiming to be the cream of the SEC without ever really contributing any titles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [658]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [17]
TigerPulse: 13%
2
|
Re: Their schedule has been soft the past 4 years and when they
Jan 7, 2014, 5:58 PM
|
|
Awwww......you two stomp your feet and throw something if that will make you feel better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Get drunk and cry like Spurrier after that TN game***
Jan 7, 2014, 8:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [186]
TigerPulse: 40%
12
|
Re: SCAR Reality.....
Jan 7, 2014, 8:32 PM
|
|
> SCAR didn't play Auburn, LSU, or Auburn this year.
> They played in a weak SEC East where Florida,
> Georgia, and Tennessee had down years. All of this
> and they still couldn't make it to the title game,
> where they would have been steam rolled by Auburn.
> Yeah they beat us, yeah it sucks, but besides us they
> really don't have a great resume. Look at our last 3
> years, we have beat Virginia Tech (3x), FSU, Auburn
> (2x), LSU, Georgia, and Ohio State.
Then maybe you can live vicariously through "what could have been" had SC played Bama, LSU or Auburn. Bottom line, and spin it any way you want, but you can beat Va. Tech a thousand times in a row and it doesn't mean you beat us. Win on the field straight up, then you won't have to rationalize with stupid crap like this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2462]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
We've beat you plenty of times
Jan 7, 2014, 8:47 PM
|
|
It's not a new thing for us. You talk like we'll never beat you again, which be both know is wrong.
Honestly, I care less about our rivalry game than winning the ACC and going to BCS bowl games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6272]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
but Missouri is a STRONG SEC team
Jan 8, 2014, 10:35 AM
|
|
from a different conference recently.
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 55
| visibility 1567
|
|
|
50
