|
Replies: 24
| visibility 250
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46655
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: WATCH: Tee Higgins ranked No. 5 ACC WR
Dec 11, 2018, 6:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [137]
TigerPulse: 98%
11
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: Tee Higgins ranked No. 5 ACC WR
Dec 11, 2018, 6:29 PM
|
|
Total BS. If we only had 2-3 receivers, he would be 1-2. We have so many top WRs, have to spread it around. Would not trade any of ours for one of theirs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [45975]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 11425
Joined: 2017
|
^This^
Dec 11, 2018, 6:34 PM
|
|
That list is an absolute joke. Tee Higgins and Justyn Ross are the two best receivers in the conference. The draft will agree. Just wait for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [39381]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 33525
Joined: 2011
|
Re: ^This^
Dec 11, 2018, 8:11 PM
|
|
This-2^
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [610]
TigerPulse: 87%
21
|
Re: ^This^
Dec 12, 2018, 8:18 AM
[ in reply to ^This^ ] |
|
The list is very clearly a ranking by total receiving yards. It simply lists the top 6 receivers by yards. It’s not “ranking” them, especially since this channel is run by the ACC itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2034]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: ^This^
Dec 12, 2018, 12:21 PM
|
|
Their rankings were clearly heavily, heavily weighted by receiving yards, but Higgins was actually 6th in yards, while Curtis was 5th. Those two were flipped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3766]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: ^This^
Dec 12, 2018, 12:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: ^This^ ] |
|
That's what I thought at first too. Custis has more yards than Higgins though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Immortal [173294]
TigerPulse: 100%
69
Posts: 29141
Joined: 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17002]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21903
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: Tee Higgins ranked No. 5 ACC WR
Dec 12, 2018, 9:38 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: WATCH: Tee Higgins ranked No. 5 ACC WR ] |
|
Well said! Our "spreading it around" makes us very dangerous to any opponent we may face. There is no easy path for them. They can "pick their poison", but we still kill them. And, there is not a darn thing they can do about it. Kind of fun, ain't it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21625]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
Would love to see these other ER's 2nd half snap count
Dec 11, 2018, 6:38 PM
|
|
Vs. Higgins'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Would love to see these other ER's 2nd half snap count
Dec 11, 2018, 6:49 PM
|
|
Not exactly snap counts, but Tee only had 7 receptions in the 2nd half the entire year.
Here are the 2nd half receptions for everyone above him:
Meyers - 42
Harmon - 32
Dortch - 35
Zaccheaus - 41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4396]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Would love to see these other ER's 2nd half snap count
Dec 11, 2018, 7:28 PM
|
|
2018 Game Logs
* indicates bowl game Share & more
Modify & Share Table
##### this Table
Get as Excel Workbook (experimental)
Get table as CSV (for Excel)
Strip Mobile Formatting
Copy Link to Table to Clipboard
About Sharing Tools
Video: SR Sharing Tools & How-to
Video: Stats Table Tips & Tricks
Glossary
Receiving Tackles
Rk Date School Opponent Rec Yds Avg TD Solo Ast Tot Loss Sk
1 2018-09-01 Clemson Furman W 3 35 11.7 0 1 0 1 0.0 0.0
2 2018-09-08 Clemson @ Texas A&M W 3 123 41.0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
3 2018-09-15 Clemson Georgia Southern W 2 11 5.5 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
4 2018-09-22 Clemson @ Georgia Tech W 1 30 30.0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
5 2018-09-29 Clemson Syracuse W 4 53 13.3 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
6 2018-10-06 Clemson @ Wake Forest W 5 55 11.0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
7 2018-10-20 Clemson North Car St W 8 119 14.9 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
8 2018-10-27 Clemson @ Florida State W 6 62 10.3 2 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
9 2018-11-03 Clemson Louisville W 3 26 8.7 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
10 2018-11-10 Clemson @ Boston College W 4 63 15.8 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
11 2018-11-17 Clemson Duke W 4 47 11.8 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
12 2018-11-24 Clemson South Carolina W 6 142 23.7 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
13 2018-12-01 Clemson N Pittsburgh W 3 36 12.0 2 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
13 Games 52 802 15.4 10 1 0 1 0.0 0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4396]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Would love to see these other ER's 2nd half snap count
Dec 11, 2018, 7:33 PM
[ in reply to Re: Would love to see these other ER's 2nd half snap count ] |
|
When i count Tee Higgins reception the second half of the season i count 26 receptions. So i don't know where this statement that he had 7 comes from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [577]
TigerPulse: 59%
20
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: Tee Higgins ranked No. 5 ACC WR
Dec 11, 2018, 7:07 PM
|
|
if they are ranking it by stats, then sure, tee is the 5th best receiver in the league. If its by talent, then tee is the best, kind of like how Jonathan Taylor got the most carries in the fbs and had the most yards and won the doak walker award, but we all know ETN is the most talented
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [31]
TigerPulse: 93%
4
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: Tee Higgins ranked No. 5 ACC WR
Dec 11, 2018, 8:30 PM
|
|
You can see no.5 iate in December in the CFB
Judge for yourself after that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [65617]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 49154
Joined: 2000
|
I can only laugh at these things. I realize that the guys
Dec 11, 2018, 10:15 PM
|
|
ranked ahead of him are excellent receivers, but better than Tee, really? I mean, would Tee really be 5th string behind all of these guys if they all played on the same team? It's just like the All-Conference teams; in the ACC, Clemson players could easily, legitimately comprise 70-80% of the first team. Yet, that would seem biased and uninteresting to readers who are fans of other schools, so it's a no-go from the get-go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20918]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15344
Joined: 2010
|
Agree ST
Dec 11, 2018, 11:25 PM
|
|
And Coach Swinney is in it for the team and not the individual which inadvertently & coincidentally helps him as a head coach.
However, at all-conference selection time, it has an impact when the wealth is spread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [39224]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 51764
Joined: 2004
|
Numbers don't account for things like Higgins' downfield
Dec 12, 2018, 6:00 AM
|
|
blocking, which has been superb and directly contributed to several rushing TDs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1618]
TigerPulse: 99%
31
|
Agreed!
Dec 12, 2018, 6:09 AM
|
|
Not just Tee though. I feel like this years group of WR's blocking has been especially good. Both of the freshman (Ross and Kendrick) are tenacious blockers and I think that helped light a spark in the group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22854]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [17]
TigerPulse: 86%
2
|
Re: Agreed!
Dec 12, 2018, 8:43 AM
[ in reply to Agreed! ] |
|
Top 5 ACC WR: Tee H.
J. Ross
H. Renfrow
Amari R.
D. Kendrick
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [65]
TigerPulse: 87%
7
|
The question you have to ask yourself
Dec 12, 2018, 10:52 AM
|
|
Which if those guys would you take over Higgins?
Trying to be neutral - maybe Harmon, maybe Dortch, but honestly we all know Higgins is better. Not as many receptions to go around when you spread the ball to 5+ excellent receivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2770]
TigerPulse: 75%
33
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: Tee Higgins ranked No. 5 ACC WR
Dec 12, 2018, 12:16 PM
|
|
Even with the plethora of receivers we use, I expect him next year to easily lead the ACC in reception yardage.More established Trevor Lawrence throwing to him every game. This didn't happen this year. He'll be the obvious #1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 250
|
|
|
50
And blocking, as others noted...Tee is a beast! So are his 'mates.
