Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Rodgers = Scott?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 5
| visibility 1

Rodgers = Scott?


Feb 14, 2016, 2:53 PM

Is that a fair comparison?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Rodgers = Scott?


Feb 14, 2016, 2:55 PM

Yes. 1 noticeable difference is Amari Rodgers route running ability. Seems smoother than Artavis out of high school

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Rodgers = Scott?


Feb 14, 2016, 3:06 PM

Similar in size...they're both around 5'11 and stocky build. Rodgers is a tad better athlete. At this point in his career he is a slightly better route runner, faster and has an impressive vertical leap. He has a real knack for high-pointing the ball in traffic with soft hands. He has some impressive upside, and is almost college ready now.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'd be curious as to both of them's 40 time.***


Feb 14, 2016, 3:13 PM



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Rodgers = Scott?


Feb 14, 2016, 3:19 PM

seems rogers has a little bit more explosion and high points the ball a lot better.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Rodgers = Scott?


Feb 14, 2016, 5:26 PM

Would like to compare 40 times.

Rodgers is thicker, heavier and shorter when comparing them as high school juniors.

Scott was rated marginally higher.

badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Replies: 5
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic