|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1302
|
Legend [6705]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
UGA is not that good.
1
Sep 30, 2023, 6:01 PM
|
|
Definitely not as good as the past two seasons.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5643]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
1
Sep 30, 2023, 6:03 PM
|
|
No they’re not, but auburn is playing the best they have all season on defense. If auburn offense could do anything they would win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8712]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
I remember when we had some close calls on the way
3
Sep 30, 2023, 6:05 PM
|
|
To a championship run.
That said, I hope they lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [56142]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
1
Sep 30, 2023, 6:05 PM
|
|
They weren't even good last season the only reason they were in the natty was because of the Ohio State's missed field goal. Plus they played TCU in the natty which is the only reason they won.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3907]
TigerPulse: 65%
35
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:05 PM
|
|
Agree. Someone is eventually going to get us. Even if we survive today, a loss to Kentucky next week wouldn't surprise me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [56142]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:05 PM
|
|
Weren't you the guy who was saying that Georgia was going to three peat all off season?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3907]
TigerPulse: 65%
35
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:10 PM
|
|
Yes. I thought this would be Kirby's best team. I thought we'd be better with Beck's arm. Looks like I may have been wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [56142]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:11 PM
|
|
Who do you think wins the natty this year then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3907]
TigerPulse: 65%
35
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:14 PM
|
|
Can't really say. Haven't watched Michigan or Ohio State. I just know we haven't looked impressive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [919]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:25 PM
[ in reply to Re: UGA is not that good. ] |
|
At this point, who is more disappointing to you, Beck or the WRs? I expected more out of both. The 2 transfers, Lovett and Thomas, haven't had the impact I expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3907]
TigerPulse: 65%
35
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:29 PM
|
|
I don't know why UGA can't seem to throw the ball down field. I thought with Beck's arm and the addition of Lovett and Thomas, they'd be more explosive. When they are open, Beck overthrown them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [29]
TigerPulse: 100%
3
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:10 PM
|
|
I sure wish we could use the TE the way they do, Briningstool had 3 catches for 5 yards and a fumble
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [56142]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:12 PM
|
|
Someone said earlier that we turned down there TE because Briningstool committed first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [29]
TigerPulse: 100%
3
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:37 PM
|
|
Sounds about right, I think coming out of HS Briningstool was the 1 ranked TE and Bowers was 3. Don't think it has anything to do with either player abilities but their guy is AllAmerica monster, ours is lambchops due to coaching and scheme. You would think given the lack of consistent WR production the last couple seasons that developing and using good TE would be a no-brainer, unfortunately the only no-brainers in Clemson are the coaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1999]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:30 PM
[ in reply to Re: UGA is not that good. ] |
|
If we had a TE like Bowers, i imagine we would ride him like a rented mule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6705]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:35 PM
|
|
Correct Bowers > Briningstool
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18162]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 26862
Joined: 2006
|
i havent seen one clear cut dominant team this year
2
Sep 30, 2023, 6:13 PM
|
|
national title seems wide open for those top teams still in the race
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24728]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 33019
Joined: 1998
|
Not to defend Georgia, but who should be ranked ahead of
Sep 30, 2023, 6:20 PM
|
|
them? As you said, who are the dominant teams this year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18162]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 26862
Joined: 2006
|
thats my point though
Sep 30, 2023, 6:40 PM
|
|
including them there is no one dominant..id keep them in first until they get knocked off but tthis team doesnt seem as good as it was the past couple of years. fortunately for them though they play a weak schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [773]
TigerPulse: 68%
22
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:21 PM
|
|
I don’t know who is tbh. There are wholes in every team. It’s a shame we couldn’t get the job done last week, because I think anyone could take the crown this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5056]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
There is no dominate team.
Sep 30, 2023, 6:24 PM
|
|
With portal, the talent has spread.
Ohio state has dropped.
Ga, Bama, and Clemson were the big 4.
We all have dropped in dominance.
While I am concerned about every game, I also think that there is not one team I am scared of.
The world has changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15674]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 16071
Joined: 2010
|
Re: There is no dominate team.
1
Sep 30, 2023, 6:28 PM
|
|
Yeah, The portal has spread everywhere but Clemson SC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4906]
TigerPulse: 98%
37
|
Re: UGA is not that good.
1
Sep 30, 2023, 6:41 PM
|
|
All teams are struggling in games.
Texas, apparently the best team in the country, struggled with Wyoming.
Auburn is a rivalry game as well.
They’re playoff good, but they won’t win a 3-peat
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1302
|
|
|
50
