Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
TNET: Clemson fires employee over social media posts, two faculty members removed from teaching duties
Tiger Boards - The Amphitheatre
add New Topic
Replies: 73
| visibility 12474

TNET: Clemson fires employee over social media posts, two faculty members removed from teaching duties

1
23

Sep 15, 2025, 1:13 PM
Reply

 
Clemson fires employee over social media posts, two faculty members removed from teaching duties

Read Update »


flag link
military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wrong Board ?***

3
13

Sep 15, 2025, 1:16 PM
Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Geez some people have no sense of humor.***

6

Sep 15, 2025, 1:49 PM
Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.***

9

Sep 15, 2025, 3:11 PM
Reply

There is nothing humorous about being pleased or celebrating someone being murdered...

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.***

1
7

Sep 15, 2025, 8:56 PM
Reply

Did they celebrate him being murdered, or did they talk about how he supported racism, violence against ppl of color, hate towards women, especially black women. Violence is terrible, no place for it period. This country is so hateful. Just curious to know if they actually celebrated it, or did they call out how bad of a person Charlie was.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.***

1
12

Sep 15, 2025, 9:08 PM
Reply

You are an idiot. Give one example of your baseless accusations and how he was a “bad person”.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.***

1

Sep 16, 2025, 12:43 PM
Reply

They don't give examples. It's frightening how many human beings have been programed and will regurgitate that programing without a shred of evidence.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.***

1

Sep 21, 2025, 10:10 AM [ in reply to Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.*** ]
Reply


You are an idiot. Give one example of your baseless accusations and how he was a “bad person”.




https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexalisitza/viral-charlie-kirk-quotes?origin=hfspl

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They were fired

2

Sep 15, 2025, 10:35 PM [ in reply to Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.*** ]
Reply

after the board litigated the evidence.

HTH.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: They were fired

1
1

Sep 16, 2025, 7:59 AM
Reply

No. They were fired because of the backlash. Initially, Clemson said they had a right to their opinion.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You are delusional and misinformed you clearly never watched Charlie

1

Sep 15, 2025, 10:37 PM [ in reply to Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.*** ]
Reply

Your loss… we will pray for you.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.***


Sep 16, 2025, 7:57 AM [ in reply to Re: Geez some people have no sense of humor.*** ]
Reply

Maybe you should leave this country. Sounds like it's too much for you to be here. You would probably fit in well, in China. Their people all go with the communist narratives and blindly believe Idiocracy, much as you do

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wrong Board ?***

23

Sep 15, 2025, 2:57 PM [ in reply to Wrong Board ?*** ]
Reply

If you believe that it's the wrong board, just maybe you should look for another board to visit. Personally, I'm glad that the mods chose to paste this on this board bc, I may not have known that Clemson was willing to take action towards any of their employees that expressed glory over the murder of Charle Kirk to a student or in a classroom in front of many students.

Also, I must say that I'm very proud of the people in charge at Clemson that has done the right thing as far as I'm concerned. It is in my personal opinion that anybody that's employed at Clemson should not ever be allowed to celebrate his/her actions of another human being murdered by a trashy coward that will hide behind building for the only purpose of slaying another human only bc of their political choices.

It's also my personal opinion that scum like the person who assassinated Charlie Kirk should be put to death in the most painful way ever known to mankind. And we also must never forget that the exact same type of action could just as easily happen to one of us that visits T-Net, or to someone that we love dearly.

Our lawmakers must find a solution that will deter the actions like the murder of Charlie Kirk from happening bc the very same thing could just as easily happen to anyone one of us anytime we leave the safety of our homes. Some criminals won't even allow the safety of our homes be enough to protect us because they will wait until we're sound asleep in our bed and sneak in and murder us while we're asleep, and it's getting worse by the day.

Charlie Kirk is a complete stranger to me bc I had never heard of him before he was murdered last Wednesday, but I have grieved for his children mostly and I guess that is bc I lost my dad at age 10 and I remember what my life was like without my dad. I also grieve for his wife and very close family members also bc I know and remember what it was like to have lived almost my entire life without my dad, and if that wasn't enough, I was awakened in the middle of the night a few years ago to learn that my youngest daughter had died unexpectedly from pancreatic hemorrhaging. So, if you T-Netter have a minute to spare, send your prayers up for Charkie Kirk's kids bc they will need all the prayers they can get during their life without their father...

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Wrong Board ?***


Sep 15, 2025, 10:17 PM
Reply

Agreed. Same goes for anyone else who commits murder of political figures. Party lines aside

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wrong Board ?***

2

Sep 15, 2025, 3:18 PM [ in reply to Wrong Board ?*** ]
Reply

It was because you spelled Bored wrong!

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Wrong Board ?***

2

Sep 15, 2025, 4:44 PM
Reply

Great post. I feel the same way. Thank you

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wrong Board ?***


Sep 15, 2025, 3:47 PM [ in reply to Wrong Board ?*** ]
Reply

Yes. Still the wrong board.
We have to figure out how to fire all of our football coaches, coach’s friends, family, hire new coaches, change culture, get more NIL money, hit the portal, and win the National Championship every year. 😎

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wrong Board ?***

1

Sep 15, 2025, 5:07 PM
Reply

But, a good warning for all of us not to post any hateful stuff here on Tigernet.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wrong Board ?***


Sep 15, 2025, 5:07 PM [ in reply to Wrong Board ?*** ]
Reply

Maybe not. Did anyone else get a phone call that stated we are grateful for loyal football supporters followed by we wanted to check in to see if you have any questions,comments, or concerns. Must be worried about IPTAY support as well as general university support.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wrong Board ?***


Sep 15, 2025, 10:01 PM
Reply

I got one on Friday. Made me instantly think of this situation. Possibly damage control?

That's all I'll say on the matter.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wrong Board ?***


Sep 15, 2025, 6:00 PM [ in reply to Wrong Board ?*** ]
Reply

Nope

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee***

8
1

Sep 15, 2025, 1:18 PM
Reply



2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I know some state employees who have been fired for

4

Sep 15, 2025, 1:27 PM
Reply

lesser offenses.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


They can, but they can also be sued for it so you

1
4

Sep 15, 2025, 1:51 PM [ in reply to So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee*** ]
Reply

have to follow termination law and policies to mitigate that aspect as much as possible. Some of these may have had employment contracts which provide additional latitude beyond a regular employee. The AG admits the potential for civil liability in his letter indicating the state wouldn’t hold Clemson/employees criminally responsible for violating state law by giving written opinion that it doesn’t apply in this case. He makes it quite clear that action is not civil protected. I.e, the terminated can certainly sue. It’s going to cost Clemson a bunch of $ in the end. Legal fees if nothing else. Hope the state provides CU with additional allocations to cover that expense. As a parent, I don’t worry about my kid being indoctrinated by some professor he may see 30 times over the course of a semester in a class with other students. In fact, I know my kid is going to not register for a class with a nut job. All the info about professors is ready available. I worry more about my kid not missing classes or being influenced by AI, YouTube videos, social media posts that are aimed at their age group that are biased in both directions and usaully not factual. That’s the much bigger risk in the era. That and gaming(which he doesn’t do a lot of) is where a bunch of radical #### is spread also from both sides.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee***

6

Sep 15, 2025, 1:52 PM [ in reply to So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee*** ]
Reply

Well, the threat from donors, elected State politicians and consideration for removing all funding - got them “”steppin’ and fetchin’ “ to do something fast ..

2025 orange level membertnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

But they better not let this matter die on the vine . . .

3

Sep 15, 2025, 2:39 PM
Reply

we need to not forget about it simply b/c they did something to satisfy everyone right now. The jokers need to be fired. I get that Clemson has to go through the motions via the investigation. Fine. But when the investigation is over, then unless there is the extremely unlikely event of a case of mistaken identity, then they should use whatever contractual morals clause available to summarily, swiftly, and unapologetically fire these two.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee***

3
1

Sep 15, 2025, 1:54 PM [ in reply to So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee*** ]
Reply

Unless you’re stupid, no one said you couldn’t fire someone. What people did say is that you have to do it correctly, and looks like Clemson did that. I know it’s hard for you to grasp some of the most basic concepts.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee***

1

Sep 15, 2025, 2:00 PM
Reply

I can't speak for their intellect. All I know is there were posts making that claim and none were couching it with "unless you do it correctly" and yes, I did see some of those as well.

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee***

2

Sep 15, 2025, 3:09 PM
Reply

I also saw a post or two where it was said that Clemson couldn't fire them. I remember the post bc I was asking myself why the h&ll not!!! I thought that if an employee was making serious negative remarks about someone being murdered, the employer should have the right to fire them, and if for nothing else, for inciting harsh feeling among other employees and causing more harsh words to be spoken...

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee***


Sep 15, 2025, 4:22 PM [ in reply to Re: So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee*** ]
Reply

You are wrong about almost everything on this topic. It has no 1st amendment issues, like zero. It also occurred in a Right to Work State where one can be fired for anything, if you need any more explanation just ask.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee***


Sep 15, 2025, 10:21 PM
Reply

In a right to work state, that doesn’t mean there are zero expectations or guidelines on how it’s done. Employers take steps to protect themselves from getting sued. Which is what we see now. And Clemson even calls it out. People here arbitrarily reference a term like a headline and think there’s nothing more to it.

If this is hard for you to understand, let me know. I know it’s a new concept for most people here.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When are libtards ever right about anything?***


Sep 15, 2025, 11:27 PM [ in reply to So much for those folks who said we couldnt legally fire a state employee*** ]
Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

About Time

12

Sep 15, 2025, 1:38 PM
Reply

Thank you Clemson

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Guess I'm not getting those free football tickets Now***

3

Sep 15, 2025, 1:40 PM
Reply



2025 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Geville Tiger on Clemson football , "Dabo's only problem is he has to deal with turd fans questioning every move he makes.”


Re: Guess I'm not getting those free football tickets Now***

2

Sep 15, 2025, 1:54 PM
Reply

Nope, parking spot gone too ;)

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Appropriate actions taken.

1

Sep 15, 2025, 1:48 PM
Reply

What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


Re: Appropriate actions taken.


Sep 15, 2025, 3:14 PM
Reply

I think that saying goes like this, what's good for the Goose is also good for the Gander, or that's the way I've always heard it said!!!

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Both are acceptable for the idiom.


Sep 15, 2025, 4:11 PM
Reply

I posted the way I have always heard it. Merriam-Webster backs me up ... 😉

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/what%27s%20sauce%20for%20the%20goose%20is%20sauce%20for%20the%20gander

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


Good riddance.***

3

Sep 15, 2025, 1:55 PM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hm

2
2

Sep 15, 2025, 2:02 PM
Reply

“Cancel culture is bad unless it’s for something I disagree with” - Average user

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Hm

3

Sep 15, 2025, 2:22 PM
Reply

You are an idiot.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes, he is . . .

2

Sep 15, 2025, 2:34 PM
Reply

these morons that view opposition to cancel culture as having set up some sort of uniform, rigid standard of absolutely **never** - under ANY circumstances - cancelling, firing, censuring, shaming, tabooing, chastising, or otherwise ostracizing anything for anything have missed the point -- some out of stupidity, and some on purpose.

OF COURSE a society should have standards and ostracize people in some cases. The question is not THAT, but where the lines are drawn. It's not drawn and **mere** disagreement, but rank, wicked, publicly flaunted immoral statements are fair game and should be. No apologies.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Hm

1

Sep 15, 2025, 2:38 PM [ in reply to Hm ]
Reply


“Cancel culture is bad unless it’s for something I disagree with” - Former Psychologically Projecting Cancel Culture supporter




FIFY

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


Re: Hm


Sep 15, 2025, 4:24 PM [ in reply to Hm ]
Reply

You mad bro? Awww, I feel badly for you, NOT!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Hm

1

Sep 15, 2025, 4:36 PM [ in reply to Hm ]
Reply

The problem with cancel culture is that people were being canceled for telling the truth.
With the consequence culture, people are fired for despicable behavior. Completely different things.
I guess people thought that being able to burn cities without facing the consequences was the norm, but I think that we've finally reaching a turning point. How many cities have been burned down in Kirk's name?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Hm


Sep 15, 2025, 10:27 PM
Reply

Thank you for challenging my statement in a respectful way, and not just trying to swing with insults like the others. And being able to articulate clearly.

I appreciate your point of view and agree with it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Why enter a subject when you are commenting?

1
4

Sep 15, 2025, 2:33 PM
Reply




Back 13 years ago before I retired, all employees were trained to understand the email system belonged to the company and that social media was not protected. I know many things have changed today, but the bottom line is emails and posts that wrongly reflect on company or school standards should not be written. I had never heard of Charlie Kirk but that in no way means his life was not valued and he should be respected for that.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The moral outrage is laughable

1
3

Sep 15, 2025, 3:20 PM
Reply

and hypocritical as the far right ignores the vile death threats against mentally ill persons from one of their own standard bearers;

Fox & Friends host Brian Kilmeade apologized on Sunday, September 14, 2025, for a comment he made during a broadcast suggesting that homeless, mentally ill people should receive an "involuntary lethal injection". During a segment on Wednesday, September 10, Kilmeade also said, "Just kill 'em," in reference to the same population.

Kilmeade will continue to spout hate, lies and devise rhetoric to the MAGA faithful without full accountability.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable

4

Sep 15, 2025, 3:25 PM
Reply

What he said was totally wrong and certainly ill advised regardless of the circumstances, but I have not seen anyone here or elsewhere condoning it. Dumb statements are dumb statements regardless of your political leanings.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: The moral outrage is laughable

1
2

Sep 15, 2025, 3:42 PM
Reply

Nor have we heard anybody advocating for him to be fired. The hypocrisy here is rich. We should all reap what we sow and not get do-overs for excessively vile statements like that. I would never advocate for death in any circumstance, but we all know that spreading hate against any segment of our society can cause bad things to happen and should not be condoned. As an Independent I feel Charlie crosses that line many times.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable

2

Sep 15, 2025, 4:50 PM
Reply

He should be fired, just as Dowd was.

Completely moronic thing to say.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable


Sep 15, 2025, 5:12 PM
Reply

If we came up with all of the examples of leaders and celebrities saying hurtful and stupid things, and they were fired, no one would be left to lead or entertain us.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Its Fox, he will likely be promoted.***

1

Sep 15, 2025, 9:43 PM [ in reply to Re: The moral outrage is laughable ]
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable

3

Sep 15, 2025, 3:26 PM [ in reply to The moral outrage is laughable ]
Reply

Kilmeade does not work in public education so this is comparing apples to oranges. However, if enough sponsors pull their money or viewers quit watching, he will be fired as well.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable


Sep 15, 2025, 4:29 PM
Reply

Yup, these professors are just fools. The Fox guy answers to Fox, whatever they choose to do is up to them. Clemson answers to the State, alumni and donors. Guess the FAFO, my bet is they wrongly thought 1st amendment rights

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable

1
2

Sep 15, 2025, 5:16 PM [ in reply to Re: The moral outrage is laughable ]
Reply

Disagree, that is comparing naval oragnes to valencia oranges.

At the end of the day people in position of influence, including media and education, should not be advocating, celebrating, coercing, suggesting or otherwise supporting killing one another. Period. Full stop.

And if anyone thinks the problem is "the other side", you are part of the problem by supporting the dangerous rhetoric that got us here.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable

1

Sep 15, 2025, 4:32 PM [ in reply to The moral outrage is laughable ]
Reply

sbdy said:

and hypocritical as the far right ignores the vile death threats against mentally ill persons from one of their own standard bearers;

Fox & Friends host Brian Kilmeade apologized on Sunday, September 14, 2025, for a comment he made during a broadcast suggesting that homeless, mentally ill people should receive an "involuntary lethal injection". During a segment on Wednesday, September 10, Kilmeade also said, "Just kill 'em," in reference to the same population.

Kilmeade will continue to spout hate, lies and devise rhetoric to the MAGA faithful without full accountability.


And Fox News has the right to terminate him

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable

1
2

Sep 15, 2025, 4:55 PM [ in reply to The moral outrage is laughable ]
Reply

Kilmeade should be fired for saying that.

As should all these terrible people on the left that have had such an evil reaction to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable

1

Sep 15, 2025, 7:52 PM [ in reply to The moral outrage is laughable ]
Reply

sbdy said:

and hypocritical as the far right ignores the vile death threats against mentally ill persons from one of their own standard bearers;

Fox & Friends host Brian Kilmeade apologized on Sunday, September 14, 2025, for a comment he made during a broadcast suggesting that homeless, mentally ill people should receive an "involuntary lethal injection". During a segment on Wednesday, September 10, Kilmeade also said, "Just kill 'em," in reference to the same population.

Kilmeade will continue to spout hate, lies and devise rhetoric to the MAGA faithful without full accountability.




In recent years, mainstream political discourse has increasingly abandoned policy-based debates for the use of extreme labels, particularly among radical groups such as those identifying as ANTIFA. Rather than engaging in dialogue about the role of government or social programs, some activists resort to branding supporters of capitalism as "fascists"—a term loaded with deeply negative historical connotations. This kind of rhetoric seeks not only to delegitimize opponents but also to fuel division within society, eroding the foundation for constructive discussion and pushing differences toward hostility and, at times, glorification of confrontational tactics. The result is a troubling shift away from thoughtful disagreement and toward polarized, adversarial exchanges and violence. Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a left-wing ANTIFA member.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The moral outrage is laughable

1

Sep 15, 2025, 10:34 PM
Reply

The irony in your comment is worth putting on a poster.

Anyone who can’t or refuses to acknowledge that both sides are contributors to the rhetoric and where we are today shouldn’t be taken seriously. If you only call out the opposing party while thinking your own political party is this innocent angel lacks intelligence. Both sides do it. Campaigns on both sides are rooted in only doing this.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ive yet to see or hear a mainstream news org or GOP party linked person


Sep 15, 2025, 10:51 PM
Reply

Use charges like Nazi, Racist, Fascist when describing their political opponents. Or encourage people to “get in their faces and let them know they are not welcome here!” Or encourage acts of violence against an administration and its supporters. Or suggest “taking out Trump” and “86ing Trump”.

This whole lie that it is both sides issue is just that… a BS lie! Stop spinning like a top!

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Ive yet to see or hear a mainstream news org or GOP party linked person

2

Sep 15, 2025, 10:58 PM
Reply

You’ve never heard any of those instances from anyone related to GOP? No name calling, ever? Lol, it happens all the time. And it starts at the top. You’re the first person I’ve seen who actually denies this happens at all. Which is sad.

You’re a perfect example of burying your head in the sand and of true ignorance.

My point stands. If you actually want productive conversation, you have to be willing to acknowledge that both parties are at fault. I can acknowledge that. Members of congress can. Why can’t you? Until then, don’t expect anything to change at all.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Ive yet to see or hear a mainstream news org or GOP party linked person

2

Sep 15, 2025, 11:09 PM [ in reply to Ive yet to see or hear a mainstream news org or GOP party linked person ]
Reply

Feel free to watch an easy to find montage of Trump using these terms frequently. Unless he isn’t GOP-linked: https://x.com/mehdirhasan/status/1967461459409121428

Let me know if you need more evidence from anyone else, whether it’s from his family or general GOP.

And for what it’s worth, I don’t like the account that posted the video, and generally disagree with his posts, but you can’t be that dumb.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The terrorist left is about to have a rude awakening

1

Sep 15, 2025, 11:29 PM [ in reply to The moral outrage is laughable ]
Reply

Your daddy Trump is about to unleash hell on you extremists. Expect dark days ahead, and we are going to do it without violence. The Democrat party may be no more very soon, and it is all the fault of people like you.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The terrorist left is about to have a rude awakening


Sep 16, 2025, 7:15 AM
Reply

Is everything okay at home? You seem really upset. You say “we” as though there’s some action you’re going to take against people who have a differing political view. Sounds like you’re incapable of having a mature conversation, and that’s sad.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Going to be tough to find positions elsewhere, too.

1

Sep 15, 2025, 3:28 PM
Reply

Some folks (usually young folks) haven't come to understand that one represents one's employer 24/7/365. If you threaten or damage their brand, they're going to lawyer up and adios you ASAP.

Because it's too competitive now for these universities -- families can be fickle about where to invest their tuition dollars. And it is an investment.

Therefore, optics matter more than ever.

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Good start, but the other 2 must be fired!***

2

Sep 15, 2025, 3:54 PM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I know we know who it is, but why is Clemson not calling them out by name?***

1

Sep 15, 2025, 3:58 PM
Reply



2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


same***


Sep 15, 2025, 4:26 PM
Reply



2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I know we know who it is, but why is Clemson not calling them out by name?***


Sep 16, 2025, 7:21 AM [ in reply to I know we know who it is, but why is Clemson not calling them out by name?*** ]
Reply

Why does it matter for Clemson to include their name? That doesn’t help Clemson, and only strengthens a counter lawsuit. Nothing like a good Christian on TNET to want someone who makes a career mistake to never be satisfied unless the person can’t feed themselves again. 😂

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TNET: Clemson fires employee over social media posts

1

Sep 15, 2025, 4:35 PM
Reply

Social media postings, even on such a board as this, if they reflect poorly on your employer, can be grounds for termination. If you sign that code of online conduct, you are responsible to post responsibly. Mean what you say but not in a mean way.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson fires employee over social media posts


Sep 15, 2025, 5:26 PM
Reply

I think the article stipulated that the issue was in HRs hands? Slot something to that effect which usually means that the offending individual still has privacy rights. So it prob won’t be publicly posted unless they choose to sue…then it becomes public record.

1. I’ve never met Kirk nor anyone I know has met him. I have seen many postings of/by him on soc media.

2. People celebrating the death of anyone for disagreeing with their beliefs are horrible people. I am aware that most public figures have said or represented themselves poorly on occasion…still does not justify this bad behavior. They have also been misquoted or taken out of context…still wrong.

3. I’ve seen Kilmeade…never cared much for him I think he should be fired for what he said…despicable comment.

I’ve never had any problems with people when discussing politics or religion…I have firm beliefs for both but I still believe in loving others…

And I believe in grace for those who say things that hurt my feelings…but walking away is better than trying to hurt someone in a public space…or making up vile accusations and lies when you’re losing the debate…

Our society has lost a lot because of the screamers/haters. Kirk is one more tragedy to add.

Go Tigers!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Well


Sep 15, 2025, 6:03 PM
Reply

Pretty tragic. Hopefully they dont have families. Either way, it's a good lesson for others that might be so.foolsih down the road.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thank you Clemson!***


Sep 15, 2025, 6:21 PM
Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 73
| visibility 12474
Tiger Boards - The Amphitheatre
add New Topic