|
Replies: 18
| visibility 51
|
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:01 PM
|
|
I would stuck with Rosier.
|
|
|
|
 |
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:02 PM
|
|
He!! No.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6865]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:02 PM
|
|
Me too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [351]
TigerPulse: 44%
16
|
Stupid moved***
Nov 24, 2017, 3:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1593]
TigerPulse: 77%
30
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:04 PM
|
|
He will be back next possession
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [100]
TigerPulse: 95%
11
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:04 PM
|
|
NO!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26071]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 34127
Joined: 1998
|
No. They've been here before and know how to pull it out.
Nov 24, 2017, 3:04 PM
|
|
They've done it all year with him. Stick with him and let him be the hero.
Big mistake going into a big game next week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18408]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10717
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:04 PM
|
|
Yes, I like the call and would hope Dabo would do something like that too in the same situation. Maybe done it earlier in the game but he’s just trying to get his offense focused.
Watch it work. Rosier comes out on fire after this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [76]
TigerPulse: 98%
8
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:43 PM
|
|
Dabo would never do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18408]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10717
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 4:30 PM
|
|
Sometimes it makes sense. Especially first year starters. Lots of teams have done it for various reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8577]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:05 PM
|
|
No way. Seems it would disrupt the whole team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18408]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10717
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:19 PM
|
|
I think that was his whole point. But he wasn’t counting on that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [76]
TigerPulse: 98%
8
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:42 PM
|
|
You never bench your 10-0 starter in that situation. Shows Miami was too desperate. If a team goes 10-0 the exact team goes 10-1. You never make a change like that. Rosier is not going to want to compete going forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3702]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Why then????
Nov 24, 2017, 3:44 PM
|
|
Do TNetters call for Kelley to be benched & put in HJ ??? asking for a friend ???
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [76]
TigerPulse: 98%
8
|
Re: Why then????
Nov 24, 2017, 3:50 PM
|
|
Only if Kelly gets hurt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18408]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10717
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Why then????
Nov 24, 2017, 3:55 PM
[ in reply to Why then???? ] |
|
I’ve seen a few great coaches over the years do the exact same thing. And it’s not really benching a player. Maybe you just need him to get more focused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18408]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10717
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Would you have benched Rosier?
Nov 24, 2017, 3:50 PM
[ in reply to Re: Would you have benched Rosier? ] |
|
I think he waited too long but other people are saying he did for something he did or said... if so it’ll come out.
I think it was a good decision, just too late in the game. He should have done it in the 3rd quarter. You take other players out? Why not your qb if you think he’s not focused.
If Miami had come back and won people would have said it was a masterful call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12943]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
I suspect Rosier did something to upset Richt
Nov 24, 2017, 3:49 PM
|
|
the field reporter said that Richt went up to Rosier and said, "I expect more from you"...
IMO, that doesn't sound like a "performance" statement when you are 10-0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23113]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 16275
Joined: 2010
|
Would not have mattered either way - both QB's stunk***
Nov 24, 2017, 4:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 18
| visibility 51
|
|
|
50
