|
Replies: 17
| visibility 51
|
Oculus Spirit [40325]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 22703
Joined: 2003
|
What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 25, 2019, 9:11 PM
|
|
Personally, I would like to beat LSU and UGA. It would then utterly decimate any SEC dominance soundbites.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7945]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 25, 2019, 9:17 PM
|
|
You clearly underestimate the SEC's talent with excuses.
I'll take Oklahoma round 1, Ohio State or Georgia round 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34758]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 24066
Joined: 2003
|
Cal in the first round and Iowa in the championship
Sep 25, 2019, 9:21 PM
|
|
It “could” happen
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [621]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
I agree with wanting to beat 2 SEC teams. However I would
Sep 25, 2019, 9:23 PM
|
|
like for the team we play in the Championship to have blown out their opponent in the playoff; thereby giving them a false sense of hope in the championship right before we steamroll them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32160]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
I kind of agree. We've already humiliated Bama, ND, OK, and
Sep 25, 2019, 10:12 PM
|
|
OSU. We've defeated Auburn and TAMU and LSU. We need to round out our SEC dominance by humbling UGA now. I still have Mich on my long range list because we've never even played them, but it looks like they won't make the show, again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32160]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
When Danny left I think he had beaten 5 of the top 6 coaches
Sep 25, 2019, 10:14 PM
|
|
Switzer, Hayes, Paterno, Bowden, Osborne...but he never got a shot at Shembechler, sadly
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
Definitely UGA, but we've already beat LSU in a bowl so
Sep 25, 2019, 10:19 PM
|
|
I'd rather play someone newer. Don't know who that would be, however, since there seem to be few teams worthy of the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6579]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 25, 2019, 10:20 PM
|
|
UGA in the semi. Bama in the final. Take out both of their division champs. It would "mean more" SEC beat downs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4324]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 25, 2019, 10:29 PM
|
|
Beat Georgia fans back to the 80s where their glory days lives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4324]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 25, 2019, 10:31 PM
|
|
Wish we could beat Georgia in the simi's then beat their stink A.sses again in the championship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2835]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 25, 2019, 10:35 PM
|
|
1. Clemson
2. Alabama
3. Ohio State
4. Oklahoma
Clemson dominates Oklahoma, then Alabama again. Same as it ever was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2835]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
thuga is not a playoff team
Sep 25, 2019, 10:37 PM
|
|
Neither is LSU.
Neither is Notre Dame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [669]
TigerPulse: 96%
21
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 25, 2019, 11:35 PM
|
|
Frankly I would like for zero (0) SEC teams to make the playoff. Not because I fear them, but because it would basically set the narrative spinning into oblivion for at least a few weeks after the season. Problem is for that to happen it would take a round robin SEC beating each other so the smoke blowers would use that to promote them next year, but it would bring a smile to my face for at least a short time to not listen to the drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [669]
TigerPulse: 96%
21
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 25, 2019, 11:35 PM
|
|
Frankly I would like for zero (0) SEC teams to make the playoff. Not because I fear them, but because it would basically set the narrative spinning into oblivion for at least a few weeks after the season. Problem is for that to happen it would take a round robin SEC beating each other so the smoke blowers would use that to promote them next year, but it would bring a smile to my face for at least a short time to not listen to the drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7219]
TigerPulse: 70%
42
Posts: 20390
Joined: 2006
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 26, 2019, 7:08 AM
|
|
Obviously we want any SEC team not named Coots, or Commodores, or Wildcats, or Tigers( no the other Tigers), perhaps a good Florida team like when Tebo was there.
UGA, definitely, but we should play them every year anyway, home and away.
But I would love a matchup with Southern Cal, or Oregon, but only if they were legitimate contenders(12-0 or 11-1 records).
With 5 Power conferences, the one thing I don't want to see is 2 teams from the SEC, especially if the other team was the runner up in the SECCG. I would like to see it mandated that only the Conference Championship game winner gets in, and that Notre Dame is "forced" to joining the ACC, or any conference 'full time" or they don't get in.
Make it an even, and equal playing field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11397]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13352
Joined: 2014
|
I wouldn't mandate it only be conference champs, but I would
Sep 26, 2019, 7:23 AM
|
|
make it very difficult for a non champ to get in. Non champ could only get in over a conference champ, if they have a better record than the conference champion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [66972]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 24719
Joined: 2011
|
LSU in the the first game, OK, OSU or Wisconsin in the final
Sep 26, 2019, 7:30 AM
|
|
I'd love to see how many points our offense can score on that LSU defense. And, a shutout of the SEC in the championship game would be the best!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6825]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: What is Your Ideal CFBP Line Up For The Tigers to Play
Sep 26, 2019, 7:33 AM
|
|
Semis: Ohio State Again
Finals: Washington. Chris Petersen - I would love to see the Dabo v Petersen game. Sadly, we will have to wait for next year or longer.
Could care less about any SEC team and would find it funny for them NOT to make it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 51
|
|
|
50
