|
Replies: 28
| visibility 2783
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 48606
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
1
Oct 17, 2025, 12:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102835]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 30077
Joined: 2005
|
Ryan Kantor is obviously a coot...
4
Oct 17, 2025, 1:03 PM
|
|
smh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4438]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
What a laughable projection***
3
Oct 17, 2025, 1:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [74644]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 25600
Joined: 2005
|
Yet, he's leading the predictions
1
Oct 17, 2025, 1:14 PM
|
|
He might not be wrong.
7 of those 10 points might be from the defense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2538]
TigerPulse: 85%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9920]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: What a laughable projection***
Oct 17, 2025, 2:41 PM
[ in reply to What a laughable projection*** ] |
|
There's easy money to be made on the money line if he's that confident that SMU will win...and a 31-10 prediction is pretty darn confident.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7152]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2054]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [74644]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 25600
Joined: 2005
|
Kudos for taking off the orange colored glasses
3
5
5
Oct 17, 2025, 1:08 PM
|
|
I got a feeling we get blasted without Cade
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4824]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Kudos for taking off the orange colored glasses
Oct 17, 2025, 6:30 PM
|
|
Agreed. No cade means beat down unless vizzina magically morphs into competent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [128]
TigerPulse: 99%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5588]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
Oct 17, 2025, 2:08 PM
|
|
I am not as confident as you are. I don't think we score over 17 with CV at QB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16206]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 14440
Joined: 2001
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
Oct 17, 2025, 2:09 PM
|
|
What was Klubnik even doing in the game at that point last week?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2867]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
Oct 17, 2025, 8:04 PM
|
|
That is the question that all these media people such as David Hood or William Qualkenbush should have asked Dabo at the 11 am media time on Monday.
surroundedtiger
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [391]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
Oct 17, 2025, 2:34 PM
|
|
If CV doesn’t play well in the first quarter, Pearman comes in with a chance to make his mark as a top contender to start in 2026. He won’t pass up on that chance and will have a huge game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9920]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
Oct 17, 2025, 2:40 PM
|
|
So Pearman won't pass up on that chance, but CV will? Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2054]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: I think his point is that Pearman might be the better of the 2.....
Oct 17, 2025, 4:17 PM
|
|
.... which is my thought too. May be wrong though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8793]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?***
Oct 17, 2025, 2:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8793]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
Oct 17, 2025, 2:47 PM
|
|
If Vizzina looks like he has for the past couple of seasons, combined with what a hot mess our offense already is, we will be lucky to get 10 points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4552]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
2
Oct 17, 2025, 2:58 PM
|
|
I have zero confidence in any of our backups to throw the football effectively
Haven’t seen enough from any of them to provide.
What Dabo has to say about CV is irrelevant as it’s just coachspeak.
That being said I would play Denson. Unpopular perhaps but
SMU is going to crowd the box and dare our unproven QB to beat them
A fleet-footed Denson can make them back out and play honest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [978]
TigerPulse: 96%
24
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
1
1
Oct 17, 2025, 3:11 PM
|
|
Clemson will win regardless who plays Quarterback. The Defense will shine and all you fair weather fans can pull for another team for the rest of the season. GO TIGERS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [846]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
4
Oct 17, 2025, 4:04 PM
|
|
If they were "fair weather fans" they wouldn't be spending all this time on the message boards during a mediocre season, they would go and do other activities and only return to the message boards again when Clemson was having a great season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5567]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Amen***
Oct 17, 2025, 4:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2054]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2867]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: TNET: Boom !
Oct 17, 2025, 8:07 PM
|
|
That’s right!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [424]
TigerPulse: 80%
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2054]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5567]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Wow reading this was so depressing. Have we really fallen that far?
Oct 17, 2025, 4:19 PM
|
|
Sad and pathetic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [936]
TigerPulse: 98%
24
|
Re: TNET: Clemson vs. SMU Prediction: Can the Tigers prevail with an unsettled QB situation?
Oct 17, 2025, 4:23 PM
|
|
They can though not going so far as predicting they will. Whether it's Vizzina or Pearman, both will have to play better than they have yet. The defense needs to prove that the last 2 games weren't because they were playing inferior competition. A greater commitment to the running game better be part of the game plan as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 28
| visibility 2783
|
|
|
50
