Replies: 17
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [4660]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6064
Joined: 10/20/15
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2550]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1918
Joined: 2/23/99
|
TD from me for linking STS******
Jan 25, 2017, 1:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4660]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6064
Joined: 10/20/15
|
Re: TD from me for linking STS******
Jan 25, 2017, 1:24 PM
|
|
Cool man, thanks for adding to the community. If I whined loud enough, could I serve you banstick for lunch or do I have to post on FGF first? Wahhhhhh
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2550]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1918
Joined: 2/23/99
|
Re: TD from me for linking STS******
Jan 25, 2017, 1:28 PM
|
|
Not sure I understand what the hell you're talking about, but I posted to fess up that it was me and tell you why. STS was very vocal on their fire Coach Swinney agenda for many years, and I'm not going to forget it any time soon.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1560]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 2455
Joined: 2/10/06
|
If so, I guess you should TD everyone who posts on TNET, too
Jan 25, 2017, 1:35 PM
|
|
Since there were quite a few people on TNET who thought the exact same way.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2550]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1918
Joined: 2/23/99
|
Not the writers or mods.
Jan 25, 2017, 1:37 PM
|
|
As far as posters go, there were really only a few, but they posted with such frequency that it may have seemed like many.
Message was edited by: Surf Cat®
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4660]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6064
Joined: 10/20/15
|
Re: TD from me for linking STS******
Jan 25, 2017, 3:54 PM
[ in reply to Re: TD from me for linking STS****** ] |
|
ESPN talks crap about Clemson on a daily basis... do you TD every poster that shares a link back to ESPN also? Your issue with STS seems personal (and old at this point)... has absolutely no bearing on what this article was about. And if you were looking for a "thank you" for admitted you were the dik that TD'd the post in the first place - you've got us wrong guy.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
it was written by a former poster on here, he even uses the same screen name...
Jan 25, 2017, 3:57 PM
|
|
he did on here, other than one minor change. He posted here under drewtigeralum03
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3405]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5216
Joined: 1/26/09
|
Re: TD from me for linking STS******
Jan 25, 2017, 6:02 PM
[ in reply to Re: TD from me for linking STS****** ] |
|
TU for me only to counteract the TD. At least Surfcat was man enough to say it was him though.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4660]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6064
Joined: 10/20/15
|
Re: TD from me for linking STS******
Jan 25, 2017, 6:50 PM
|
|
Haha, appreciate you bro. Unfortunately, our TUs don't count because we have donated (yet). I'm about to though, just so I can feel this amazing power of TD'ing everything you disagree with.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
F*** STS those hacks said we wouldn't win a national title..
Jan 25, 2017, 3:51 PM
|
|
Those hacks are freaking clueless and post links in there articles from websites that teach kids about football. Their analysis is pointless because they are always wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4660]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6064
Joined: 10/20/15
|
Re: F*** STS those hacks said we wouldn't win a national title..
Jan 25, 2017, 4:00 PM
|
|
I thought the article was actually quite honest. There weren't any cheap shots. Our running game WASN'T as robust as any of us thought it would be. You can blame the author, the playcalling, the offensive line, whatever you want, but the fact remains. I don't think Gallman was thrilled about his stats. And I'm positive that Feaster & Choice aren't either. I didn't read anything in the above article that was grossly misrepresentative of our rushing offense in 2016. Cheers to happier days for both of you guys and to a more productive rushing offense in 2017! With a new QB at the helm, we are going to need more than 45 yards per game from our feature back(s).
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
he is making the false assertion that Gallman wasn't that good...
Jan 25, 2017, 5:41 PM
|
|
And the RB position is up in the air, when CJ Fuller has proved himself in critical situations and we have Feaster. It's a false assertion that we are lacking talent at RB.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2721]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2059
Joined: 7/21/03
|
Re: he is making the false assertion that Gallman wasn't that good...
Jan 25, 2017, 6:33 PM
|
|
He said Gallman would be carving up NFL defenses and that his struggles this year were not his fault. He said CJ probably was in the best position to grab the starting spot and that Feaster surprised him that he didn't contribute more in the passing and return game but had a lot of talent and could push. I'm not sure we read the same article. Not a huge fan of STS, but nothing wrong with this article and certainly nothing wrong with the OP bringing this to the table when RB (largely because of Travis Etienne) is a hot topic today.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4660]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6064
Joined: 10/20/15
|
Re: he is making the false assertion that Gallman wasn't that good...
Jan 25, 2017, 6:45 PM
|
|
Bravo sir, bravo. Seriously. It's nice to see that someone gets it. I am amazed at the plethora of knowledge both available to, and shared with by the users of TigerNet. This article today resonated full-well with the discussions of the day, or so I'd thought, and I had no idea how passionately some of us felt toward STS. Regardless, I appreciate this post. Thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
drewtigeralum used to post on here, they hire anybody who hates Clemson..
Jan 25, 2017, 3:52 PM
|
|
on that site
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3194]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 3543
Joined: 11/21/11
|
I personally ejoy reading STS, well at least
Jan 25, 2017, 3:59 PM
|
|
quackingtiger's posts on recruiting. He's really accurate on his predictions
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1
|
|
|