|
Replies: 37
| visibility 2056
|
Solid Orange [1305]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
Letitia James indicted
1
Oct 9, 2025, 4:57 PM
|
|
the DJT revenge tour is still going.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24744]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 19246
Joined: 1998
|
A grand jury would indict a ham sandwich if asked to do so
Oct 9, 2025, 5:09 PM
|
|
Only thing needed is “probable cause”, majority of jury and there’s no defense.
Conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, unanimous jury and defense can present argument, question witnesses etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1305]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
Re: A grand jury would indict a ham sandwich if asked to do so
1
Oct 9, 2025, 5:17 PM
|
|
Yup, I know all that but it just reenforces this is nothing but a revenge tour for DJT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4700]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: A grand jury would indict a ham sandwich if asked to do so
1
Oct 10, 2025, 8:37 AM
|
|
And I'm here for it. Pure entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26074]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 34128
Joined: 1998
|
Remember when we used to believe that no man is above the law?***
Oct 9, 2025, 5:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1305]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
Re: Remember when we used to believe that no man is above the law?***
Oct 9, 2025, 5:18 PM
|
|
Yeah that sounds good and totally how it is supposed to work but the rich and powerful have always gotten a different brand of justice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26074]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 34128
Joined: 1998
|
Actually, the Supreme Court has designated one man as above the law.
Oct 9, 2025, 5:20 PM
|
|
Partisan hacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1305]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
Re: Actually, the Supreme Court has designated one man as above the law.
Oct 9, 2025, 5:25 PM
|
|
Much the same as EO's can be wiped away buy the next guy, that SCOTUS ruling can and will be used by the next President. Folks forget the sun does not shine on the same dogs behind all the time. That is why we are supposed to have separation of power, an unbiased judiciary and a functional Congress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1305]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
Re: Actually, the Supreme Court has designated one man as above the law.
1
Oct 9, 2025, 5:28 PM
|
|
I would add that the Executive branch should not be occupied by an ego maniac with narcissistic tendencies. But that is what was elected, cannot make this stuff up. Idiocracy is here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26074]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 34128
Joined: 1998
|
I would expect the Robert's court opinions to be THE most overturned by
Oct 9, 2025, 5:31 PM
[ in reply to Re: Actually, the Supreme Court has designated one man as above the law. ] |
|
future courts in our nation's history. It won't happen as quickly as we hope, but it will happen.
I just don't see Democratic Presidents, and hopefully future Republican Presidents, being this aggressively corrupt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9989]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
1
Oct 9, 2025, 5:28 PM
|
|
Take her evil --- down. What she did to Trump was pure evil and everyone knows it. She's disgusting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26074]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 34128
Joined: 1998
|
Trump received due process. Evidence was presented. Defenses were made.
1
Oct 9, 2025, 5:36 PM
|
|
A jury of his peers unanimously agreed that he was guilty as charged on all 34 counts.
Let's see how this progresses.
What is your understanding of what she did in this case?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19051]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 20424
Joined: 2015
|
lol, you tried.***
1
Oct 9, 2025, 6:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2875]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13408]
TigerPulse: 94%
48
Posts: 16476
Joined: 2021
|
Re: Trump received due process. Evidence was presented. Defenses were made.
1
Oct 9, 2025, 9:52 PM
[ in reply to Trump received due process. Evidence was presented. Defenses were made. ] |
|
The venue was wrong, along with State Court instead of federal court.
Trump’s ‘crime’ was, according to NY State, election interference. The ‘proof’ of that ‘election interference’ was the accounting records in which the payments to Trump attorney Michael Cohen were called ‘legal expense’ whereas the NY jury was told that these accounting records should have said ‘hush money payoff to Stormy Daniels.’
State of NY had no standing to convict based on ‘election interference’ because Trump did not win the State of NY’s electors.
Furthermore, election interference on the national scale (for which theoretical standing would apply on the national level, since Trump did win the 2016 presidential election) requires that a federal court try the case.
Yet, crooked NY State’s judicial system said ‘no no no we want this federal matter to be tried in state court’ and the Democrat-judge stacked Southern District of NY federal court refused to hear the Trump / Stormy Daniels case after State of NY came out with their legally incorrect verdict.
That case has dissolved into irrelevancy since there are no major punishments for Trump and Trump win 2024 election anyway despite that BS verdict.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5941]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
Oct 9, 2025, 9:59 PM
[ in reply to Re: Letitia James indicted ] |
|
You’re in da cult and brainwashed. Everyone does NOT know it. He’s a greaseball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19051]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 20424
Joined: 2015
|
She literally ran on the get trump platform. Fk her.***
3
Oct 9, 2025, 6:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26074]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 34128
Joined: 1998
|
You don't see that as a plus?***
Oct 9, 2025, 6:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19051]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 20424
Joined: 2015
|
Not when NY created new laws and trump was the only person charged.
2
Oct 9, 2025, 6:41 PM
|
|
That’s called lawfare; thank your God Bammy for inventing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1316]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
Re: You don't see that as a plus?***
Oct 10, 2025, 9:38 AM
[ in reply to You don't see that as a plus?*** ] |
|
No, not to those that think men shouldn't be in the little girls restroom. Like you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26074]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 34128
Joined: 1998
|
Letitia James responds to Trump directing the DOJ to indict her.
Oct 9, 2025, 6:50 PM
|
|
Trump has picked fights with the two worst opponents he could have chosen. James and Comey are too smart and charismatic. This is not going to end well for Trump and Pam.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIGCV98XD3Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1132]
TigerPulse: 91%
26
|
Smart and charismatic?
1
Oct 9, 2025, 7:47 PM
|
|
When I read that, I literally spit my drink through my nose. Thanks for the laugh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13408]
TigerPulse: 94%
48
Posts: 16476
Joined: 2021
|
Frame of reference matters
Oct 9, 2025, 9:55 PM
|
|
To idiots, another idiot is also smart and charismatic.
Letitia has the brains of a cabbage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5941]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: Frame of reference matters
Oct 9, 2025, 10:03 PM
|
|
RTD talking about Leticia not being smart. That b i t c h could run circles around your a$$ 🙄
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1715]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Re: Frame of reference matters
1
Oct 10, 2025, 9:31 AM
|
|
RTD talking about Leticia not being smart. That b i t c h could run circles around your a$$ 🙄
She is not smart
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1316]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13408]
TigerPulse: 94%
48
Posts: 16476
Joined: 2021
|
Re: Frame of reference matters
Oct 10, 2025, 2:18 PM
|
|
L.James: “No one is above the law.”
Mortgage fraud, as pertains to home loans that are written in accordance to FHFA standards (and which makes those home loans eligible to be purchased by Fannie Mae), is a federal crime.
There might be an argument for a person who is ignorant of the law and of how mortgages are done gets convinced by the bank’s loan officer to sign a mortgage application without reading the document, or being instructed (with either deliberate deception or inattentiveness) to inadvertently sign off on an incorrect mortgage loan document.
However, for a person of ‘magnificent’ legal skills, as is clearly (sarcasm meter is on fire) such as the State of NY Attorney General to not be smart enough to understand a mortgage loan application and then sign such a document (certify that the information is understood and true) to be ‘misled’ by the mortgage loan officer and to not possess the wherewithal to neither read nor understand the mortgage loan application defies all excuses.
She committed mortgage fraud, and as one of the highest stature officers of the court, she should be held to a higher standard than the average schmuck. BTW, ‘average schmucks’ go to jail when convicted of mortgage fraud.
Yet, here we are. Leticia No One Is Above The Law James commits mortgage fraud … her signature is on the fraudulent documents, which she does not dispute … and then cries that she shouldn’t be held accountable EVEN AFTER she convicts a private citizen whose politics she didn’t like of a non-federal crime version of mortgage fraud.
If it weren’t for double standards, leftists would have no standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1316]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
Re: Smart and charismatic?
Oct 10, 2025, 9:37 AM
[ in reply to Smart and charismatic? ] |
|
me too. had to dry off my keyboard. Of course he voted for hilary too so ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4700]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13408]
TigerPulse: 94%
48
Posts: 16476
Joined: 2021
|
Re: Letitia James responds to Trump directing the DOJ to indict her.
Oct 10, 2025, 2:20 PM
|
|
He’s a low information man. One among many perfect useful idiots for the Democrat Party.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6238]
TigerPulse: 87%
40
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
1
1
Oct 9, 2025, 8:10 PM
|
|
As long as she didn’t break any laws then she’s got nothing to worry about. No big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9989]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
1
Oct 9, 2025, 10:02 PM
|
|
Trump didn't break any laws and he had plenty to worry about. Liberal judge, prosecutors and jury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1316]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
1
Oct 10, 2025, 9:40 AM
|
|
In FACT the banks that loaned him the money said it was a great deal for them and they would do it again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6837]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 11364
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
Oct 10, 2025, 12:02 AM
|
|
No big deal.
Disgraceful as that bish is, she ain't doing time.
The process is the punishment, as I'm sure she knows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2451]
TigerPulse: 96%
32
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
2
Oct 10, 2025, 9:01 AM
|
|
Just enforcing the law against Democrats who cheated and lied for 8 years to get rid of him
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1316]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
1
Oct 10, 2025, 9:34 AM
|
|
Not revenge its justice. You'll have to explain why Letitia went after Trump. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1316]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
1
Oct 10, 2025, 9:40 AM
|
|
More revenge is the companies leaving NYC due to Letitia for fear she'll treat them the say illegal way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7529]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 12041
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Letitia James indicted
Oct 10, 2025, 4:11 PM
|
|
It’s black and white that she committed mortgage fraud. She indicted Trump for BS. Guess she FAFO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 37
| visibility 2056
|
|
|
50
