|
Replies: 24
| visibility 5,255
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11780
Joined: 11/30/95
|
Recruit Update: DB target picks Gamecocks
Jun 21, 2013, 8:56 AM
|
|
Message was edited by: TigerNet Recruiting®
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
/\ insider info /\
Jun 21, 2013, 9:06 AM
|
|
Hope he comes to his senses and picks Clemson....he looks pretty solid. The "have totry to fail" pitch his buddy Key nonchalantly threw out there last week has the makings of a classic though...and so many kids today undervalue hard work in the classroom.
Come on Mr. Green , a CU degree is worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6980
Joined: 10/12/06
|
Re: /\ insider info /\
Jun 21, 2013, 9:08 AM
|
|
Rumor has it we backed off of Green and that is his reason for a surprising decision to attend Jr. College.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2759]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1979
Joined: 8/23/12
|
If we got him on campus...
Jun 21, 2013, 9:24 AM
|
|
...and he still wants to play for the Lamecocks instead of us, let him go. Having a close friend somewhere is a strong pull to a school; I'm not expecting a surprise here. Especially not since Key let the cat out of the bag that coot academics are a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 23%
Posts: 249
Joined: 6/29/11
|
Re: If we got him on campus...
Jun 22, 2013, 4:59 PM
|
|
About time to let go on the "Key" comment don't you think? Already been established that is was well out of context with 2 media outlets retracted. Try and deal with reality....oops, I forgot I was on a Clemson board. My bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [195]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 495
Joined: 5/9/12
|
clemson seems
Jun 21, 2013, 9:39 AM
|
|
To have backed off a lot of recruits lately. I guess it traumatizes them so much they feel like they have to commit to SC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6653
Joined: 9/1/11
|
yeah...we are picky now, and dont mind SCar getting scraps
Jun 22, 2013, 1:27 PM
|
|
once in a while
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [441]
TigerPulse: 34%
Posts: 1346
Joined: 1/2/13
|
So because SCar got him, now we are saying we
Jun 22, 2013, 6:48 PM
[ in reply to clemson seems ] |
|
"backed off of him." Right...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Clemson now has
Jun 21, 2013, 10:05 AM
|
|
to find a few quality OL ...tjere are never enough of those big uglies..imo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2839]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4656
Joined: 1/7/12
|
Re: Clemson now has
Jun 22, 2013, 1:29 PM
|
|
I think they will only take Taylor Hearn and possibly one more. The 2015 cycle will be more focused on the offensive and defensive lines because we will be graduating a lot of guys on the two deep.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: clemson seems
Jun 21, 2013, 10:33 AM
|
|
If it doesnt traumatize them and they dont detect the difference then they are numb from the adams apple up...which is about what they recruit down there at Sackerlina.
Coots feel nothing above the chin strap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [400]
TigerPulse: 24%
Posts: 1255
Joined: 11/3/06
|
Re: Recruit Update: 4-Star DB to announce today
Jun 21, 2013, 1:41 PM
|
|
Green committed to the Gamecocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2430]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3245
Joined: 11/11/11
|
Re: Recruit Update: 4-Star DB to announce today
Jun 21, 2013, 1:59 PM
|
|
well. atleaste he wont have to study anymore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [980]
TigerPulse: 37%
Posts: 3073
Joined: 3/6/03
|
Too bad, the ##### won out for this one***
Jun 21, 2013, 3:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [142]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 288
Joined: 10/2/12
|
This was a good pick up for CarlsJr
Jun 21, 2013, 4:26 PM
|
|
However, if we pick up DJ Smith, I could really care less. Not to mention I'm still ecstatic about Mackensie Alexander (and Adrian Baker, Korrin Wiggins, Jayron Kearse, Cordrea Tankersley, etc. etc. etc.). Not a huge position of concern for us at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [195]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 495
Joined: 5/9/12
|
DJ
Jun 21, 2013, 10:16 PM
|
|
Will pick the Gamecocks as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [171]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 615
Joined: 9/24/01
|
Re: DJ
Jun 21, 2013, 10:20 PM
|
|
Hmmmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [142]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 288
Joined: 10/2/12
|
Even if he does
Jun 22, 2013, 1:30 AM
[ in reply to DJ ] |
|
which is a bold prediction (he hasn't named Carolina as his leader), we are still out-recruiting yall in every way. Number one QB in the country, all I gotta say....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Even if he does
Jun 22, 2013, 9:05 AM
|
|
Dont you guys always outrecruit them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [195]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 495
Joined: 5/9/12
|
correct brookyb
Jun 22, 2013, 9:28 AM
|
|
They out recruit us on skill positions but never on the LOS, which is the battle that has hurt them most over the last 4 years vs us. Clemson gets some amazing WR and RB and always has their share of 4 and 5 star guys, but thankfully they dont see the benefits of loading up on the line.
I was reading a thread the other day about high octane offense scoring so mich that you dont need a great D. I think this is true but Clemson would be terrifying with their offense and an SEC built defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [214]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 296
Joined: 3/2/12
|
Re: correct brookyb
Jun 22, 2013, 11:59 AM
|
|
First off Clemson cares just as much about defense as they do offence, why bring in BV to coach the D if you didn't care. They wouldn't have they would have just paid Joe Blow off the streets $100,000 to make it look like he was coaching. Clemson was the YOUNGEST team in college football for the 2011 season with something like 42 to 44 true and redshirt freshmen, thats dang near half the team (look it up if ya want). If you look to the years before the 2011 season you would see that Clemson was a perennial top 20 defense and if you knew anything about football you would also know that the defense is the hardest side of the ball to comprehend as far as responsibility and knowing the many different assignments depending on how the offense is lined up. So you add the youth plus what it takes mentally to play that side you can see where the Clemson D has had to grow up these past to season. Clemson will be much much improved on that side of the ball this year. As far as the trenches I will give you the O-line even though the ##### don't recruit that any better than Clemson but the D-line I would almost put the number of guys drafted off Clemson's D-line up against any program in the country all you have to do is a little fact checking before you go onto message boards typing things that sound good to a #### fan but is in reality just factually wrong. It isn't hard to make sure what your writing is true fact checking is something you should have done in middle school not trying to bust your chops but do some research before you come on a Clemson board saying they don't do defense or recruit guys for the trenches...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6653
Joined: 9/1/11
|
poor fellow***
Jun 22, 2013, 1:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [195]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 495
Joined: 5/9/12
|
dude relax
Jun 22, 2013, 1:35 PM
|
|
All i was saying was that your offense was so potent that you didnt have to be amazing on defense, just a good one. Geez guy, all ponies and rainbows in your world huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [90699]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 45477
Joined: 10/18/09
|
A little Rude...but I couldn't care less since WE TOO DEEP..
Jun 22, 2013, 4:44 PM
|
|
and so was Little Boo Peep! Ha.
gOtiGERS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Re: If we got him on campus...
Jun 22, 2013, 7:09 PM
|
|
@ 18wheeler :
You ARE on a Clemson board...which begs the question ; Why? I have never gone on any SCar site...and wouldnt think of it. Must be some sort of inferiority complex that keeps you defending your school on big brothers pages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 5,255
|
|
|
50
