|
Replies: 41
| visibility 510
|
All-In [10441]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 16980
Joined: 2001
|
Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 4:23 PM
|
|
More sacks than Doink the Clown(ey)
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [765]
TigerPulse: 99%
22
|
Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 4:38 PM
|
|
But The Clown had it so much tougher with those tough SEshe offensive lines. NOT...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [26353]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13702
Joined: 2013
|
But but but but
Jan 13, 2014, 4:39 PM
|
|
they ran away from the clown almost every play!!! it's just not fair!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11161]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 10900
Joined: 2007
|
Clowney recorded lots of QB hurries.***
Jan 13, 2014, 4:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [87656]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 45524
Joined: 2004
|
he could see it in their eyes.***
Jan 13, 2014, 4:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11161]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 10900
Joined: 2007
|
And he herd they were scared.
Jan 13, 2014, 4:52 PM
|
|
s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2403]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
The spell it skeered in Columbia***
Jan 13, 2014, 5:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [765]
TigerPulse: 99%
22
|
He also had that
Jan 13, 2014, 5:05 PM
|
|
big hit on the Michigan player that knocked his helment off. Wow. Did you guys see that? Oh yeah, he was totally unblocked on the play.....big deal....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [70]
TigerPulse: 20%
8
|
Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 7:05 PM
|
|
not true... both played 3 years and Clowney had 24 sacks vs. VB at 21. Clowney also had way more solo tackles, assists AND tackles for loss. More forced fumbles as well.
Clowney was also twice voted All-American (once unanimously), was all-SEC for all three years and finished 6th in the heisman voting his Sophomore year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2403]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Beasley only played 2 years on defense***
Jan 13, 2014, 11:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2676]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
did the clown play this year ?
Jan 14, 2014, 8:37 AM
|
|
thought he was 'saving' himself
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
which was bogus hype, besides Beasley only started one year***
Jan 14, 2014, 8:41 AM
[ in reply to Re: Beasley > Clowney ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
I'vegotthecooties has a point
Jan 13, 2014, 7:08 PM
|
|
Though Clowney started every game since he has been at South Carolina. I'm going to assume that they have played a similar amount of snaps. Advantage Clowney.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [804]
TigerPulse: 85%
23
|
Re: I'vegotthecooties has a point
Jan 13, 2014, 7:24 PM
|
|
That's not right at all. Beasley has played the DE position for 2 seasons, 2012 and 2013. He had 8 sacks in around 250 snaps in 2012. Not sure how many he had this year but I would guess 450 or so and he had 13 doing that. I would be willing to bet Clowney has played at least 350 or more snaps at the DE position in2011-2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2403]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
But Clowney missed several games, and he only actually
Jan 13, 2014, 11:16 PM
|
|
tried on about 1 of every 5 snaps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Was a joke
Jan 13, 2014, 7:29 PM
|
|
I was disparaging Clowney for taking so many plays off. I'm well aware the Beast was played significantly fewer snaps at the DE position. Maybe even in this one year. Can't wait to see what he looks like after this offseason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [804]
TigerPulse: 85%
23
|
Re: Was a joke
Jan 13, 2014, 7:32 PM
|
|
> I was disparaging Clowney for taking so many plays
> off. I'm well aware the Beast was played
> significantly fewer snaps at the DE position. Maybe
> even in this one year. Can't wait to see what he
> looks like after this offseason.
my reply was supposed to be to 'I've got the cooties' since he has no idead what he's talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [804]
TigerPulse: 85%
23
|
Re: Was a joke
Jan 13, 2014, 7:42 PM
|
|
just looked it up. Vic played 373 snaps this season. he's played roughly 615 snaps at the DE position in his career. I bet Clowney has played at the very least 250 to 300 more snaps than him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [19]
TigerPulse: 12%
2
|
Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 7:31 PM
|
|
If Vic goes pro, I guess we'll see who the NFL thinks is better. I'm taking bets on Clowney if anybody wants in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1677]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
Re: Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 7:42 PM
|
|
You tell em coot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [19]
TigerPulse: 12%
2
|
Re: Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 7:51 PM
|
|
I think I just did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5027]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 8:31 PM
|
|
Tim Tebow says hello coot. Getting picked early does not always mean better!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [19]
TigerPulse: 12%
2
|
Re: Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 8:35 PM
|
|
Name a GM that you think would take Beasley before Clowney.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5027]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 8:38 PM
|
|
Didn't say there was one that would take Beasley first. Just said hype does not always equal best results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11184]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13672
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 9:10 PM
[ in reply to Re: Beasley > Clowney ] |
|
We all know how the NFL scouts screw up top draft picks. Clownwey will be drafted high only to be a non factor in the NFL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Re: Beasley > Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 10:37 PM
[ in reply to Re: Beasley > Clowney ] |
|
Mark my words...the Clown will be a BUST!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
my gosh clown did nothing this year and everyone turned thei
Jan 14, 2014, 8:43 AM
[ in reply to Re: Beasley > Clowney ] |
|
r heads away still saying he was the best. That is ignorant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Interesting though
Jan 13, 2014, 7:39 PM
|
|
Do Vic and the Iron Lung both have the same amount of sacks through their first two seasons? Wonder if Vic can get more than three next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7543]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Clowney Wears Vic Beasley Underoos....***
Jan 13, 2014, 7:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64690]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 63904
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Clowney Wears Vic Beasley Underoos....***
Jan 13, 2014, 9:51 PM
|
|
Say it ain't so!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
7
|
It's likely
Jan 13, 2014, 8:41 PM
|
|
That clowney didn't play as many snaps actually. He was not a starter his freshman season and 2012 was when lawing used the second string line every two defensive series. Not to mention, and I'm not bashing Clemson by this, but south Carolina's defense was better and had a lot more three and outs too then. Therefore less plays for him to be on the field in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [804]
TigerPulse: 85%
23
|
Re: It's likely
Jan 13, 2014, 9:10 PM
|
|
> That clowney didn't play as many snaps actually.
the only snap totals I can find on Clowney... through5 games this season and 272 total defensive snaps at that point Clowney had played in 213 of them. I'd venture to bet that Clowney has at least 400+ more snaps than Beasley has had at the position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [804]
TigerPulse: 85%
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3207]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Clowney was the starter his Frosh year.
Jan 13, 2014, 8:45 PM
|
|
And if he wasn't he was still on the field 90% of the time. Clowney also bitched and cried enough that they let him line up wherever he wanted and he still couldn't do anything this season. Clowney has had a DECENT career, but it's definitely nothing to jizz over. Beasley was 10x the player Clowney was this season and he's 50lbs lighter..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4159]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Clowney will be a bust...
Jan 13, 2014, 8:49 PM
|
|
When he gets in the NFL and realizes that there aren't any easy teams and that you actually have to work to get better, he'll be out faster than JaMarcus Russell.
Vic on the other hand has great work ethic and will more than likely be a star if he gets on the right team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [40940]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 34216
Joined: 2011
|
Clowney
Jan 13, 2014, 9:00 PM
|
|
Taxkled that guy and stuff. He scared Tajh and Aaron and many other qbs and stuff. hair And arms are longer than Vic's too. Its a slam dunk , Doo Doo's destined for success on the next level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [110]
TigerPulse: 14%
11
|
insane thinking Beasly is better
Jan 13, 2014, 10:33 PM
|
|
Statwise this year sure. OL for Wake Forest is a killer for sure. Beasly is a stud no doubt, but Clowney eill be big time in the NFL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
if you watched football at all you know Beasley is much
Jan 14, 2014, 8:47 AM
|
|
better than Clowney this year #denial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [110]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: insane thinking Beasly is better
Jan 14, 2014, 11:21 AM
[ in reply to insane thinking Beasly is better ] |
|
Or instead of pointing out Wake Forest, you could - you know, point out how Vic dominated UGA's LT and Clowney pretty much got shut out of the game. I would think that's relevant.
But you wouldn't do that, because you're a moron.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Lol the best LTs the clown played against played for Tennessee and UNC
Jan 13, 2014, 10:47 PM
|
|
That's funny that you think a bad team means bad competition. Vic played two triple option teams and didn't see the second half of multiple games this season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2676]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Clowney = Albert Haynesworth
Jan 14, 2014, 8:40 AM
|
|
keep watching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Bottom line is Clowney will never have an impact in the NFL
Jan 14, 2014, 8:46 AM
|
|
He is simply not good enough. He is an eighth grade bully on an elementary playground getting ready to join a varsity squad. That will expose him. Just wait and see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 41
| visibility 510
|
|
|
50
