|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1,417
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2729
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Quick question about officiating
Oct 11, 2014, 11:12 PM
|
|
What in the world were the refs looking at on G-Hop's catch near the sideline that was overturned?!? Looked good to 80,000+.....
|
|
|
|
 |
Mascot [20]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 63
Joined: 12/11/12
|
Re: Quick question about officiating
Oct 11, 2014, 11:15 PM
|
|
They forgot they were reffing a college game not and nfl game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3706]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2272
Joined: 9/28/08
|
It looked good
Oct 11, 2014, 11:15 PM
|
|
for more than 80,000. It was a catch in several ways. I have no thoughts on what the officials saw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [63023]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39972
Joined: 12/16/01
|
They saw money signs from Petrino.***
Oct 11, 2014, 11:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6566]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10193
Joined: 11/2/03
|
Re: Quick question about officiating
Oct 11, 2014, 11:18 PM
|
|
looking at his hands and whether or not he controlled the ball to the ground. The replay on the jumbo was of his foot. His foot was not in question. I think having to control the ball to the ground when out of bounds is a stupid rule, but that is the way the zebras are consistently calling it.
Message was edited by: reynolds357®
Message was edited by: reynolds357®
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9385]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 18375
Joined: 2/20/09
|
because Peetrino was in refs ear earlier..plain and simple***
Oct 11, 2014, 11:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2694]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2756
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Honestly
Oct 11, 2014, 11:27 PM
|
|
Thought that wasn't a bad call. GHop had a foot in bounds but the ball was still loose and not totally under control due to it being tipped. He gathered it in while in the air, and MAY have tapped a toe down before going OOB. But it was not obvious and not enough to overrule the call. Heck of an effort though, great concentration by Germone!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54237]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43666
Joined: 11/17/03
|
And absolutely none of which could be seen by the ref that
Oct 11, 2014, 11:31 PM
|
|
made the call, as he was behind the receiver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54237]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43666
Joined: 11/17/03
|
And absolutely none of which could be seen by the ref that
Oct 11, 2014, 11:31 PM
[ in reply to Honestly ] |
|
made the call, as he was behind the receiver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6321]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5728
Joined: 11/2/08
|
Funny how that play was reviewed....
Oct 11, 2014, 11:31 PM
|
|
but that catch by the louisville in same situation was not reviewed
BTW, watching on tv for various angles, I think he got his toe down and clearly had control of the ball
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14921]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12314
Joined: 3/28/06
|
It was even worse: it was initially called a catch by the
Oct 11, 2014, 11:41 PM
|
|
Hopper was facing when he made it (line judge?) and then the ref Hopper HAD HIS BACK TO came in and reversed the call.
The officiating was pretty terrible today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1,417
|
|
|
50
