|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1176
|
Orange Beast [6464]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Oddsmakers wrong again..?
2
Sep 29, 2025, 1:55 AM
|
|
Betters really thought Clemson would beat Syracuse by 17
My first impression is they are wrong on 14 for UNC, even if it lowers. I hope Clemson wins, but even if they do I don’t know about a 14 point cover.
One thing this shows though is that most betters still think Clemson is bound for a really good performance because of the team Clemson has I guess.
You think so?
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [70800]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 20162
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..?
Sep 29, 2025, 7:49 AM
|
|
We'll cover it easy and should get most of our travel roster some snaps. That's all I'm really looking for is how Dabo responds as to playing personnel.
Talk about a team that's checked out, it's unc. It's a clown show that might draw 20k fans. Probably more Clemson fans. It was a joke hire and they have no clue what their identity is. Can anything happen, of course. But ucf had me believing they were pretty good by beating unc by 30... but they (ucf) was a joke at a bad k state team.
Bottom line, if we don't beat unc by 35 points and score 40+ then we didn't play good at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9431]
TigerPulse: 98%
44
|
Cuse lost to Duke by 5 touchdowns. GT need OT to beat Wake.....
Sep 29, 2025, 7:55 AM
|
|
What the heck identity do we have? We've barely put 40 on the board across all the games we have played so far combined......Lets just be happy to win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [611]
TigerPulse: 80%
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13778]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 10965
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..?
Sep 29, 2025, 9:28 AM
[ in reply to Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..? ] |
|
Yes CGA ...... the Belichek-Hudson hire was a joke and I predict that he will not be there next year ...... not because he will be fired (also a possibility), but because he will realize college coaching (or more likely recruitment, portal, NIL, etc.) is over his head. I think he will quit before they fire him.
As for our game, I have no clue what we are likely to do, except I'll be disappointed if we do not play significantly better than our last outings. It appears that none of the teams that we have lost to are nearly as good as we tried to make them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1778]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..?
Sep 29, 2025, 11:21 AM
[ in reply to Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..? ] |
|
You severely underestimate how awful we are right now
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12452]
TigerPulse: 75%
47
Posts: 12438
Joined: 2017
|
Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..?
2
Sep 29, 2025, 7:59 AM
|
|
Okay, let me help you understand how this works.
If you’re so sure one way or the other…
You should bet a crap ton of money on it.
That’s kinda the whole point.
Hope that helps
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1072]
TigerPulse: 99%
25
|
Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..?
Sep 29, 2025, 9:22 AM
|
|
Could care less about all the spread, o/u, etc. Just win. No reason to be overconfident at this point as we have been playing to our competition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6617]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..?
Sep 29, 2025, 9:29 AM
|
|
Not all betters thought Clemson would cover over Cuse. I took Cuse and the points and it worked out well for my wallet, not so well for my mindset about this football team. I went ahead and jumped on the UNC +13.5. Not all that confident in CK and Co. scoring 14 total points in total and certainly not confident in the Tiger D stopping UNC or any other offense for that matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8218]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..?
Sep 29, 2025, 10:57 AM
|
|
Personal opinion, but I would be (and have been) betting against Clemson every game until they prove they have anything more than a poor football team. It's been easy money so far. I'll pull for them- but this is about money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6464]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Oddsmakers wrong again..?
Sep 29, 2025, 11:19 AM
|
|
Just steer clear of betting on Clemson until we know more
I’m serious I have no clue what 14-point spread vs UNC means, nor do I negate the possibility of it happening.
But it’s not as sure as you’d like
So no Clemson right now
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1176
|
|
|
50
