|
Replies: 27
| visibility 258
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 38%
3
|
Coots v. Ky predictions
Oct 3, 2014, 10:55 PM
|
|
I have a good feeling about this one. The coots are suckin right now.
27-17 Kentucky
|
|
|
|
 |
Enthusiast [129]
TigerPulse: 27%
11
|
Re: Coots v. Ky predictions
Oct 3, 2014, 11:08 PM
|
|
S. Carolina
Record. 3-2, 2-2
Wins over top 25: 2
Best win: Georgia
Worst loss: 24 points to no. 6 Texas AM
Current votes in AP top 25: 61
Clemson
Record: 2-2, 1-1
Wins over top 25: 0
Best win: UNC
Worst loss: 24 points to no. 13 Georgia
Current votes in AP top 25: 52
We may be suckin but the resume still looks better
We win tomorrow night by a TD. Kentucky is significantly improved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 38%
3
|
Re: Coots v. Ky predictions
Oct 3, 2014, 11:10 PM
|
|
Priceless!! Coot logic 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [129]
TigerPulse: 27%
11
|
Re: Coots v. Ky predictions
Oct 3, 2014, 11:19 PM
|
|
Yeah, it's pretty crazy logic isn't it? Apparantly the voters in the polls apply the same crazy coot logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 38%
3
|
Re: Coots v. Ky predictions
Oct 3, 2014, 11:21 PM
|
|
Awesome bro! Hold on to that....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
You seem to have forgotten this...
Oct 3, 2014, 11:22 PM
[ in reply to Re: Coots v. Ky predictions ] |
|
Losses against unranked teams:
uSC: 1
Clemson: 0
Coot logic.
You think you'll win 8 this year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 38%
3
|
Re: You seem to have forgotten this...
Oct 3, 2014, 11:22 PM
|
|
I predict 6-6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [129]
TigerPulse: 27%
11
|
Re: You seem to have forgotten this...
Oct 3, 2014, 11:35 PM
[ in reply to You seem to have forgotten this... ] |
|
Sc has not lost to an unranked team. A&M is 6 and Mizzou is 24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 38%
3
|
Re: You seem to have forgotten this...
Oct 3, 2014, 11:38 PM
|
|
Dude, you're hilarious.
Keep the faith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1174]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: You seem to have forgotten this...
Oct 3, 2014, 11:48 PM
|
|
Are we really arguing rankings with an sec homer? If you can lose at home to Indiana then get ranked after only scoring 21 on scar's d then what more evidence do you need that sec teams get generous rankings.
We'll see what the playoff committee thinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [708]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: You seem to have forgotten this...
Oct 4, 2014, 6:36 AM
[ in reply to Re: You seem to have forgotten this... ] |
|
Missouri was unranked when South Carolina was beaten by them.
Still, I'd be pleasantly surprised if South Carolina lost this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1174]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: Mizzou lost to Indiana at home
Oct 3, 2014, 11:25 PM
|
|
Omg! Coots go on road for second time this season after sputtering past vandy. Good luck!
See you in the valley, I know you think you'll win...but we'll be the best d you see all year, and Watson and crew ain't turning it over 6 times.
Good luck vs Kentucky! Tough road game!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [129]
TigerPulse: 27%
11
|
Re: Mizzou lost to Indiana at home
Oct 3, 2014, 11:25 PM
[ in reply to Mizzou lost to Indiana at home ] |
|
Well if we start playing the transitive property of college football, ECU beat NC by 30, we beat ECUADOR by double digits, so that makes us 24 points better than Clemson. Or you can just use Georgia and get the same result.
I don't really believe in trying to evaluate that way though. I mean NC St needed a near miracle to beat Georgia Southern...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [129]
TigerPulse: 27%
11
|
Re: Mizzou lost to Indiana at home
Oct 3, 2014, 11:27 PM
|
|
Ecuador, lol. Spellcheck kept changing it from ECU
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Don't worry about spelling...
Oct 3, 2014, 11:28 PM
|
|
You're not smart, and it's okay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Indiana...
Oct 3, 2014, 11:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: Mizzou lost to Indiana at home ] |
|
Yeah, no big deal. Just a stupid transitive property deal.
Wait, you lost though, right? Not sure what a transitive property has to do with you losing to an unranked team, at home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Kentucky
Oct 3, 2014, 11:29 PM
|
|
unranked too. Yet I see them winning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1174]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: Kentucky
Oct 3, 2014, 11:35 PM
|
|
If mizzou and ATM play in seccg and mizzou wins does that mean Indiana gets in the playoff? Or bowling green? Since they best Indiana?
Give me more sec logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 38%
3
|
Re: Kentucky
Oct 3, 2014, 11:35 PM
|
|
Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [72]
TigerPulse: 55%
8
|
I am going with Bowling Green
Oct 4, 2014, 4:18 AM
[ in reply to Re: Kentucky ] |
|
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1472]
TigerPulse: 99%
29
|
misleading statistics
Oct 3, 2014, 11:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: Coots v. Ky predictions ] |
|
Take off you #### colored glasses.
Coots lose at home twice, CU undefeated at home.
Coots lose to unranked team, CU undefeated against unranked teams.
You also are counting the rankings for today, not for when the games were played. I'll bet the way you see it, we lost to #13 UGA while they were #4 when you beat them.
Coot logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 38%
3
|
Re: misleading statistics
Oct 3, 2014, 11:25 PM
|
|
Yeah.... Dumb a$s chicken lover.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8015]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6743]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 94%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 38%
3
|
Re: Coots v. Ky predictions
Oct 3, 2014, 11:12 PM
|
|
Cock-a-doodle-doooooooo!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8577]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Coot defense has epic 4th qtr meltdown! UK 28 scu 17*
Oct 4, 2014, 8:55 AM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 27
| visibility 258
|
|
|
50
