|
Replies: 35
| visibility 5882
|
TigerNet GOAT [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 10860
Joined: 2017
|
Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
1
Oct 16, 2025, 11:44 AM
|
|
In the last hour, the Clemson-SMU odds have changed from Clemson -9.5 to -6, over/under from 55.5 to 52.5.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6871]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Klubnik is doubtful*********
2
Oct 16, 2025, 11:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28422]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16782
Joined: 2018
|
Re: Klubnik is doubtful*********
2
Oct 16, 2025, 11:49 AM
|
|
Vegas seems to think so…
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7117]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Klubnik is doubtful*********
Oct 16, 2025, 7:51 PM
[ in reply to Klubnik is doubtful********* ] |
|
I think we see Wesco and Williams alternate at QB the first two quarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet GOAT [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 10860
Joined: 2017
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
1
Oct 16, 2025, 11:46 AM
|
|
We'll get the first official indication on the ACC availability report for ones to watch like Cade Klubnik and Tristan Leigh at 8 p.m. Thursday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [940]
TigerPulse: 98%
24
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
1
Oct 16, 2025, 11:46 AM
|
|
Because it's looking less and less likely that Cade will be available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1568]
TigerPulse: 84%
30
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
14
14
Oct 16, 2025, 11:48 AM
|
|
Well if he doesn’t go or is limited then we get exactly what we deserve with running the QB up 3+ scores. Can’t fix stupid!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1568]
TigerPulse: 84%
30
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
6
6
Oct 16, 2025, 11:49 AM
|
|
With zero backup QB development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7162]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
4
Oct 16, 2025, 12:01 PM
|
|
"with zero QB development" period.
There, I fixed it for you
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4741]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 11:55 AM
[ in reply to Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line ] |
|
TI reporting inside sources that the ankle is worse than Dabo’s min to min optimism. The line started changing accordingly. Either he plays with significant limitations or we see Vizzina and/or Pearman so the betting lines changes make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [996]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6834]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
if so then 3-4 is a real possibility
1
Oct 16, 2025, 11:58 AM
|
|
go tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1008]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: if so then 3-4 is a real possibility
3
Oct 16, 2025, 12:02 PM
|
|
3-4 is a real possibility even if a healthy Cade plays. What is new?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1615]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: if so then 3-4 is a real possibility
Oct 16, 2025, 12:08 PM
|
|
Well, didn't his availability go from day to day to hour to hour to minute to minute?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24728]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 19229
Joined: 1998
|
Brings the money line between into play***
Oct 16, 2025, 12:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9924]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Brings the money line between into play***
Oct 16, 2025, 12:52 PM
|
|
"Money line between"....?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet GOAT [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 10860
Joined: 2017
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 12:17 PM
|
|
Hard Rock at -4.5 now to Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [528]
TigerPulse: 99%
19
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 12:40 PM
|
|
Dang, and I thought this thread was going to be about Guards and Tackles from both teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [373]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
1
Oct 16, 2025, 12:54 PM
|
|
Allen better have the defense primed to go. I’d rather not see Cade out there hobbling around like Kelly Bryant did against Syracuse. That didn’t go well and I don’t want the kid to get hurt. We need to see what next year looks like at QB regardless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1617]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 1:25 PM
|
|
We’ve seen that before…and it ain’t good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [109433]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 27125
Joined: 2006
|
Luckily, weve gotten the backup qbs a lot of playing time so we know what to
4
Oct 16, 2025, 1:18 PM
|
|
expect.
😳😳😳
Message was edited by: colberttiger®
Message was edited by: colberttiger®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2029]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Luckily, weve gotten the backup and a lot of playing time so we know what to e.
1
Oct 16, 2025, 1:23 PM
|
|
If Cade is out there is absolutely no way we remain favored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1617]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Re: Luckily, weve gotten the backup and a lot of playing time so we know what to e.
1
Oct 16, 2025, 1:27 PM
|
|
I agree. I’d make us a ten plus point underdog without Cade playing. Our backup qb could barely only score once on a terrible UNC defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14959]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 24053
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4552]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
1
Oct 16, 2025, 1:22 PM
|
|
" Clemson is fighting for it's playoff life against SMU ". Dabo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1617]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 1:24 PM
|
|
How would we even be favored if Cade is doubtful?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9924]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 1:26 PM
|
|
That would mean one player is worth 10 points...and that player has been bashed repeatedly here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16211]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 14441
Joined: 2001
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 2:04 PM
|
|
Well we asked for it if he can't go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16211]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 14441
Joined: 2001
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
1
Oct 16, 2025, 2:04 PM
|
|
We being our coaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [373]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
1
Oct 16, 2025, 2:58 PM
|
|
I hope Vizzina surprises us and plays great or at least competently. At least we can see what a 4 star QB looks like after 2.5 years in the program. There will be no hiding the need to go to the portal if it doesn’t go well. No excuse for not having a backup that can execute the playbook 2.5 years in. The D and run game needs to step up to boot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2458]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 8:16 PM
|
|
I think Pearman will be in the game before it’s over. And I think he will do well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9816]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 3:50 PM
|
|
Gonna be a big win and big offensive display (although we may coast some once we get the lead). Our QB will throw for 250+ whether it’s CK or CV. Randall will get 100+ and we could see a second back near 100. You heard it here first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2679]
TigerPulse: 86%
33
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 5:59 PM
|
|
All I'm saying is Remember Vole Stoudt vs Baker Mayfield. Never bet Tiger that is highly doubted. Especially when its a 1 game thing. Yes, CV hasn't looked good, but his main target has been Turner and other non-starters. Even with less amity, if he can manage his nerves and the O-line can give him a little protection, we could win with him simply being a check-down Charlie. Clemson has enough offensive weapons to spread the ball around. His goal would be just beat us!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9924]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
1
Oct 16, 2025, 6:10 PM
|
|
Stoudt started several games prior to Oklahoma and had nearly 400 pass attempts. Vizzina has 48.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2679]
TigerPulse: 86%
33
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 16, 2025, 7:18 PM
|
|
He still stunk overall, but in that 1 game against OU he went off. For 1 game anything is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [373]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: Major movement in Clemson-SMU line
Oct 17, 2025, 6:12 AM
|
|
I went to UGA for Stoudt’s first start. Not pretty. At least Vizz will be at home against a team that we should beat. If he doesn’t turn it over we have a decent chance of winning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 35
| visibility 5882
|
|
|
50
