Replies: 15
| visibility 3
|
Scout Team [180]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 226
Joined: 12/9/15
|
Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 2:54 PM
|
|
they find out they are #5 on Tuesday night. They are expecting to be #3 just like the AP poll. Nope. They will be #5 at best.
|
|
|
|
110%er [7598]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 8038
Joined: 6/8/05
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 3:16 PM
|
|
There is no friggin way Louisville will be ranked ahead of Clemson in the only poll that really counts.....they lost to us and nothing can change that fact.......Go Tigers!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4805]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2640
Joined: 11/28/08
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 3:39 PM
|
|
I agree they shouldn't but I believe they will be ahead of us.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 752
Joined: 6/30/15
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 3:53 PM
|
|
If this committee is consistent with their process and how they rank teams accordingly then Clemson will be ahead of Louisville come Tuesday night.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [152]
TigerPulse: 52%
Posts: 276
Joined: 10/31/03
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5262]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3631
Joined: 7/7/12
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 4:13 PM
|
|
The pollster logic is that Louisville had a quality loss (to us on our field) and if the game had been played in Louisville, they likely would have won..... we did not have a quality loss and were at home...... finally, we should have lost to NC State.
I can't find much fault with where we are in any poll. We've earned the disappointment by the way we've played.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 752
Joined: 6/30/15
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 4:18 PM
|
|
Alabama lost to an OK Ole miss team last year and the year before that Ohio state lost to va tech. Also both of those lost on their own field. They both went on to win the national championship. Every once in a while you need to fail in order to become more successful in the long run. I expect this team to come out hungry the next three games.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 752
Joined: 6/30/15
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 4:21 PM
|
|
We will be in front of cards. Sitting in the easiest drivers seat to the playoff out of all of the one loss teams. We will be just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2218]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 941
Joined: 9/3/09
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 4:31 PM
|
|
None of our games will be easy. We will have to compete.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 752
Joined: 6/30/15
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 4:35 PM
|
|
Meant easiest as far as remaining opponents compared to some of the other teams vying for one of those 4 spots. Definitely not going to argue about the fact that we do have to compete or we could have another let down. If we just play a complete game each of these last three games we will win and be in.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 752
Joined: 6/30/15
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 4:13 PM
[ in reply to Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when ] |
|
We have the head to head against Louisville. Last week A&M was in front of Auburn even though they lost to a pitiful miss state team the previous Saturday. A&M had the head to head against Auburn.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9113
Joined: 1/15/08
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 4:14 PM
[ in reply to Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when ] |
|
We will be ranked ahead of U of L just like aTm was ranked above Auburn last week, for the same exact reason.
Not sure where y'all coots will be ranked because the committee doesn't rank the bottom half.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12943]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
if the committee is truly body of work on a weekly basis
Nov 13, 2016, 3:55 PM
|
|
then Clemson should remain at 2
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5262]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3631
Joined: 7/7/12
|
Re: if the committee is truly body of work on a weekly basis
Nov 13, 2016, 4:17 PM
|
|
I wish I could agree, but when I look at it objectively, I can't justify it. Hopefully the players and coaches will learn a lesson and play their way back to what can be a very good team. To do it will require a lot of introspect by all concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
If they win out, shouldn't they be in anyway?*****
Nov 13, 2016, 4:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4794]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7505
Joined: 10/24/00
|
Re: Louisville is gonna be very disappointed when
Nov 13, 2016, 4:44 PM
|
|
One thing in our favor is the chances of making the playoffs. Classify them as this;
Clemson - Controls own fate. Win out and the ACCCG and they're in.
Louisville - Needs help. Win out and they still need Clemson to lose one.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 3
|
|
|