|
Replies: 15
| visibility 2408
|
TigerNet Elite [74647]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 25478
Joined: 2011
|
Even Dukie Vitale said Rod Hall was fouled
Mar 15, 2014, 3:45 PM
|
|
The replay they just showed on ESPN really showed it clearly.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [66099]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 44954
Joined: 1998
|
where??..show me the contact?!?!
Mar 15, 2014, 3:53 PM
|
|
looks clean to me......
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2372]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: Looks like the cult ritual from The Temple of Doom.
Mar 15, 2014, 4:05 PM
|
|
That's about what it felt like, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [126]
TigerPulse: 97%
11
|
Re: where??..show me the contact?!?!
Mar 15, 2014, 7:09 PM
[ in reply to where??..show me the contact?!?! ] |
|
Looks like the ball was knocked loose on this reach in foul.
Then triped afterwards.
Opposite end— KJ received a forearm push and got called for the foul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4142]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Re: where??..show me the contact?!?!
Mar 15, 2014, 9:33 PM
|
|
Yep , you can clearly see the forearm push off in the picture .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22966]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 25003
Joined: 1999
|
per ESPN pbp:
Mar 15, 2014, 3:53 PM
|
|
The ACC officiating crew from last nights debacle said they agreed that Rod Hall was fouled but that it was "after" the ball was loose and was considered incidental contact.
My question is (despite the fact they're covering their collective a$$es) how the crew was able to discern this split second activity but were UNABLE to see the evidence to invalidate Pitts last tenth-of-a-second shot to cheat the Tigers last week????? IMO, the light on the backboard being on was much more definitive that what happened to Rod---although he most assuredly was fouled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2372]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: If only they'd reviewed it from the perspective of the
Mar 15, 2014, 4:06 PM
|
|
other basket. Then it would definitely have been called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [203]
TigerPulse: 96%
13
|
Re: If only they'd reviewed it from the perspective of the
Mar 15, 2014, 4:13 PM
|
|
baseball rules apply.....tie goes to the runner.......and clemson, no matter what the situation, is always on defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3370]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: If only they'd reviewed it from the perspective of the
Mar 15, 2014, 5:21 PM
|
|
no such thing in baseball as a tie goes to the runner.
You are either out or safe period.
Go Tigers............
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27854]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48316
Joined: 2010
|
Are you serious with this? Did they actually comment on that
Mar 15, 2014, 11:32 PM
[ in reply to per ESPN pbp: ] |
|
BS call? That's like insult to injury, describing a specific coloring of their chit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7252]
TigerPulse: 71%
42
Posts: 20428
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Even Dukie Vitale said Rod Hall was fouled
Mar 15, 2014, 4:06 PM
|
|
And the other announcer(whoever it is) said the ball was knocked loose,and then Hall was whacked;ie incidential contact.
But we all know the only way Clemson was going to win that game last night was to be in the same position as Pitt was,leading by 5 and not needing a last second shot to win,or tie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2372]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: I'd go further than that: the only way for us to beat
Mar 15, 2014, 4:11 PM
|
|
UNC or Duke - esp. in NC - is to beat the snot out of them. Winning close games isn't really going to be in the cards, evidently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [74647]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 25478
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Even Dukie Vitale said Rod Hall was fouled
Mar 15, 2014, 4:15 PM
[ in reply to Re: Even Dukie Vitale said Rod Hall was fouled ] |
|
The other announcer also said Vitale probably had a better view of it at home than he did at mid-court. I definitely agree with you--the refs can't be put in the position that judgment calls will control the final outcome when it comes to a game against Duke or UNC. It's just not going any other way. Need a cushion...
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [521]
TigerPulse: 95%
19
|
I officiated high school ball for quite some time and
Mar 15, 2014, 4:32 PM
|
|
trying not to officiate thru orange glasses, there is no way they could make that determination of ball out then contact as it happened live last night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1262]
TigerPulse: 91%
27
|
Re: I officiated high school ball for quite some time and
Mar 15, 2014, 5:06 PM
|
|
So what they are technically saying is you can knock the ballout or block a shot,then knock the #### out of a player and there is no foul. How appropriate an explanation to cover their screwing us over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62380]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 45932
Joined: 2003
|
So, if you block a three point attempt. and fall into the
Mar 15, 2014, 9:58 PM
|
|
shooter,knocking him over backwards, THAT IS INCIDENTAL CONTACT?
Bwahahhaahaaa! WHo has the pick of the guy thrusting his leg into KJ in Littlejohn. I beleive that was contact after the ball was out of his hands was it not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 2408
|
|
|
50
