|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1600
|
All-In [10292]
TigerPulse: 79%
45
Posts: 17814
Joined: 1998
|
With our offense I see another Clemson 63 Coots 17....
Nov 5, 2012, 9:30 PM
|
|
discuss
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [35209]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 37108
Joined: 2003
|
only 17 with our defense? I know Latt was a big part
Nov 5, 2012, 9:41 PM
|
|
of their offense.. but if we couldn't hold Duke to 17.. How will we hold USuC?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1777]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Agreed...I'm a little concerned with the predictions that
Nov 5, 2012, 9:51 PM
|
|
we'll somehow destroy USC this year. Hasn't tigernet said that each of the last three years? And this year - yes we have a better offense - but they have a much better defense and probably *should* win the game.
Hopefully we pull out the win...but I dread the "blowout" predictions that seem to have already started.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1041]
TigerPulse: 91%
25
|
Re: Agreed...I'm a little concerned with the predictions that
Nov 5, 2012, 10:00 PM
|
|
their defense was better last year. this year, their D Line is slightly improved, but their secondary is terrible. a huge drop off from last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1777]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Glad to hear that about their secondary...so if the O-line
Nov 5, 2012, 10:02 PM
|
|
can give Boyd time, we might keep the offense rolling. Would be awesome to see that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 14%
4
|
Re: Glad to hear that about their secondary...so if the O-line
Nov 5, 2012, 10:11 PM
|
|
Give Boyd 10 seconds to pick out a receiver like at Duke, he's a Heisman candidate. Games are won and lost in the trenches. If Boyd gets popped and has happy feet, it's 4 in a row. The offense hasn't lost the last 3 years. Being dominated in the trenches and being soft has!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5006]
TigerPulse: 93%
37
|
With our secondary it might be 63-57.***
Nov 5, 2012, 10:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1041]
TigerPulse: 91%
25
|
Re: With our secondary it might be 63-57.***
Nov 5, 2012, 10:19 PM
|
|
come on. our secondary isn't THAT bad.
we aren't playing Geno Smith again.
Connor Shaw's not much of a passing QB either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4928]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
I would bet more like 55-23
Nov 5, 2012, 10:25 PM
|
|
I think our O is better but our D is weaker (but getting better).
Florida proved that if you can get the coots on their heels they will fold like a wet napkin.
We get a couple of deep TDs on them and our D forces an early turnover by them and it could end up 63-17. Can't wait for some visor throwing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14968]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 24058
Joined: 2004
|
Honestly, i hope we score 30+, and if we do i think
Nov 5, 2012, 10:16 PM
|
|
we have a great chance to win. It's gonna be tough to get Tajh enough time to throw. Orange tinted glasses are underestimated how much pressure their D-line is going to get on us.
If we protect Taj though, the rest of their defense is vulnerable. Tennessee proved that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [865]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: With our offense I see another Clemson 63 Coots 17....
Nov 5, 2012, 11:12 PM
|
|
i'm sure Chad watched that Florida usuck game closely . the way UF negated that pass rush was with the screen pass. the one in particular i remember usuck came on a full blitz and the uf qb just tossed it over the dl to the halfback i think he went 40-45 yds untouched. I don't know about a blowout but i'm sure Chad has some tricks in mind. not to mention i hear clowney isn't 100% with that foot injury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [205]
TigerPulse: 89%
13
|
Re: With our offense I see another Clemson 63 Coots 17....
Nov 5, 2012, 11:17 PM
|
|
If it turns into one of those kinds of games, I hope we leave the first team out there for the whole 60 minutes and just see how high the scoreboard goes. That should keep the Coots quiet for a while.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1600
|
|
|
50
